Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
I feel the need for another camera
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Sep 3, 2021 14:01:36   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
FotoHog wrote:
I smell a lot of GAS in this thread. . . . .


A lot of folks on this site, not all, feel if they buy the latest and greatest their images will improve. When that does not happen they they think the newer latest and greatest will improve their images. And on and on it goes, much to the benefit of the camera company's bottom line.

Reply
Sep 3, 2021 14:06:45   #
gwilliams6
 
billnikon wrote:
A lot of folks on this site, not all, feel if they buy the latest and greatest their images will improve. When that does not happen they they think the newer latest and greatest will improve their images. And on and on it goes, much to the benefit of the camera company's bottom line.


And then there are others who have the skills ,knowledge and experience, and buy the best gear they can afford to expand their creative choices and help them get a performance edge on the competition.

Not everyone is just suffering from GAS. Though there is plenty of GAS to go around. lol

Cheers

Reply
Sep 3, 2021 14:09:41   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
gwilliams6 wrote:
And then there are others who have the skills ,knowledge and experience, and buy the best gear they can afford to expand their creative choices and help them get a performance edge on the competition.

Not everyone is just suffering from GAS. Though there is plenty of GAS to go around. lol

Cheers


As I stated, NOT ALL.

Reply
 
 
Sep 3, 2021 14:54:04   #
cbtsam Loc: Monkton, MD
 
Bellmf wrote:
I have been taking photos for 50 years, most of the past many years with Nikon D7000. I briefly used a Nikon 1 in addition. I recently got a Sony RX10 if and love it. I have sold almost all of my other gear ( had a Tamron 150-600 also). I mainly photograph family, grandkids sports, rowing, birds and some landscape. I should be happy with the Sony and stay with it, but I have rented a Nikon D500 and a Canon Eos R6 (loved the mechanics) while looking for a better and more crisp viewfinder experience. I have considered renting a higher end Sony mirrorless. I think I may be looking for too much. Any therapy would be appreciated!
I have been taking photos for 50 years, most of th... (show quote)


In what part of your body do you feel this need? Do you feel it always, or only in certain situations?

Reply
Sep 3, 2021 15:30:13   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
rmalarz wrote:
Stan, a Hasselblad H6D-400c is in the wings waiting for me to win a lottery.
--Bob


I am going to get two of them - once I win the lottery.

Reply
Sep 3, 2021 16:09:58   #
gessman Loc: Colorado
 
billnikon wrote:
(a regular here) Joined: Apr 19, 2014 Posts: 14111 Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont

A lot of folks on this site, not all, feel if they buy the latest and greatest their images will improve. When that does not happen they they think the newer latest and greatest will improve their images. And on and on it goes, much to the benefit of the camera company's bottom line.
billnikon


"Improve their images" is a subjective term that is often used to prove a point that it does not prove. Does it mean to elevate the aesthetic quality of your images to the gold standard of "Nat Geo" quality or could it be that it simply means a better "hit rate." My images have never been and aren't in danger of ever becoming "Nat Geo" quality but for as good as they are going to be I definitely get more good ones using a mirrorless camera that allows me to see the exposure of each image BEFORE I shoot as opposed to having to "chimp" the back of a dslr after a shot and perhaps have a "do over." Compare that to the days shooting slides, sending the film for development and getting it back a week later finally able to be assessed for everything that goes to make up "quality" - I call each step in that continuum to be "IMPROVING MY IMAGES" and I'm happy to spring for a new camera that engenders that process in a positive way. YMMV

Reply
Sep 3, 2021 16:30:56   #
Josephakraig
 
I have a friend that got Nikon Z7. He has big hands. He liked it but his wife got him a D850. He still has both cameras and a D810 but is getting rid of the 810 and will likely get rid of the Z. One thing the Z's are good for is video, much better than the D850.

Mirrorless has good and bad. They aren't built for big hands but they are very nice cameras and can compete with the best (D850) Nikon has to offer.

Good luck!

Reply
 
 
Sep 3, 2021 17:30:19   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
gessman wrote:
"Improve their images" is a subjective term that is often used to prove a point that it does not prove. Does it mean to elevate the aesthetic quality of your images to the gold standard of "Nat Geo" quality or could it be that it simply means a better "hit rate." My images have never been and aren't in danger of ever becoming "Nat Geo" quality but for as good as they are going to be I definitely get more good ones using a mirrorless camera that allows me to see the exposure of each image BEFORE I shoot as opposed to having to "chimp" the back of a dslr after a shot and perhaps have a "do over." Compare that to the days shooting slides, sending the film for development and getting it back a week later finally able to be assessed for everything that goes to make up "quality" - I call each step in that continuum to be "IMPROVING MY IMAGES" and I'm happy to spring for a new camera that engenders that process in a positive way. YMMV
"Improve their images" is a subjective t... (show quote)


Exactly the point I make when all the naysayers start on about upgrading not improving IQ. It’s hard to find a modern camera that doesn’t have great IQ. That’s the least of reasons to upgrade. I upgrade for features that I enjoy using and that make it easier for my to consistently get the most out of that IQ.

Reply
Sep 3, 2021 17:46:06   #
Laramie Loc: Tempe
 
Go for more than fullframe, the Fujifilm GFX 50S II.

Reply
Sep 3, 2021 20:58:36   #
Besperus Loc: Oregon
 
Canon R lenses are spendy. But if you have the bucks…Nikon, good choice too. You were the other guy who bought a Nikon 1? Hate say it but Panasonic G9 or a Olympus OMD mk II? They are compact, affordable lenses both can do video if that’s something of interest. Micro 4/3 isn’t dead, though everyone seems to be on the full frame band wagon. I rent medium format equipment and real video cameras when needed. Sony is very good too but the lenses very in cost too.
On a whim I bought a Pentax Q. Pocketable+interchangeable lens. Camera, three lenses in two jacket pockets. No pixel shift video very limited to tripod only, mediocre at best.

Reply
Sep 3, 2021 22:41:22   #
Ched49 Loc: Pittsburgh, Pa.
 
That's the problem...the more cameras you rent, the more difficult it's going to be!

Reply
 
 
Sep 3, 2021 22:58:42   #
KindaSpikey Loc: English living in San Diego
 
Hiya Bellmf, well there's absolutely no shortage of good folks on here willing to spend your money for you! Lol. Seriously though, there's tons of great advice and suggestions, I've been reading through and it's making my head spin. Good luck with the quest, I'm sure you'll wind up happy with a shiny new kit to play with, (I'm just a little bit jealous) lol. Keep shooting buddy.

Reply
Sep 4, 2021 02:41:13   #
gessman Loc: Colorado
 
Josephakraig wrote:
I have a friend that got Nikon Z7. He has big hands. He liked it but his wife got him a D850. He still has both cameras and a D810 but is getting rid of the 810 and will likely get rid of the Z. One thing the Z's are good for is video, much better than the D850.

Mirrorless has good and bad. They aren't built for big hands but they are very nice cameras and can compete with the best (D850) Nikon has to offer.

Good luck!


Gosh, I really hate to hear about the difficulty big people have to suffer through like that and walking around bumping their head on everything, feet hanging off the bed, out from under the covers in winter, etc. I'm pretty short and have troubles of my own. I think I have an allergy to beans too 'cause if I eat any kind of beans, being so short, I'll walk around for two days blowin' dirt all up in my shoes.

Reply
Sep 4, 2021 09:34:35   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
gessman wrote:
Gosh, I really hate to hear about the difficulty big people have to suffer through like that and walking around bumping their head on everything, feet hanging off the bed, out from under the covers in winter, etc. I'm pretty short and have troubles of my own. I think I have an allergy to beans too 'cause if I eat any kind of beans, being so short, I'll walk around for two days blowin' dirt all up in my shoes.
Gosh, I really hate to hear about the difficulty b... (show quote)


The quote you replied to was interesting concerning large hands and mirrorless camera's.
My favorite camera's were the D500 and D850 with the battery grip attached. I do not have large hands but I am 6'3" and my hands are not small. I found reaching for my custom buttons easy on these extended rigs.
Enter the mirrorless Sony a9, I found that I had to have the battery grip attached to make it much easier to handle than the a9 without the battery grip attached.
It also balances better with the Sony 200-600 and 600 f4. Without the battery grip making the camera body larger these lenses would, for me, be much harder to use hand held.
So yes, for many males, and probably some females too, find the mirrorless camera's too small without the battery grip attached to help us with larger hands operate our camera's.
Good luck and keep on shooting until the end.

Reply
Sep 4, 2021 09:38:07   #
KindaSpikey Loc: English living in San Diego
 
billnikon wrote:
The quote you replied to was interesting concerning large hands and mirrorless camera's.
My favorite camera's were the D500 and D850 with the battery grip attached. I do not have large hands but I am 6'3" and my hands are not small. I found reaching for my custom buttons easy on these extended rigs.
Enter the mirrorless Sony a9, I found that I had to have the battery grip attached to make it much easier to handle than the a9 without the battery grip attached.
It also balances better with the Sony 200-600 and 600 f4. Without the battery grip making the camera body larger these lenses would, for me, be much harder to use hand held.
So yes, for many males, and probably some females too, find the mirrorless camera's too small without the battery grip attached to help us with larger hands operate our camera's.
Good luck and keep on shooting until the end.
The quote you replied to was interesting concernin... (show quote)


👍Great point.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.