Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Auto-Pilot in cars
Page <<first <prev 6 of 9 next> last>>
Aug 23, 2021 12:56:07   #
Retired CPO Loc: Travel full time in an RV
 
williejoha wrote:
What does this have to do with photography?
WJH


General info, non photography section.

Reply
Aug 23, 2021 13:30:32   #
G. Crook Loc: Linden, TX
 
williejoha wrote:
What does this have to do with photography?
WJH


Nothing. Read the heading of this section.

Reply
Aug 23, 2021 13:50:49   #
kenArchi Loc: Seal Beach, CA
 
Even the software in my thermostat goes bad.
Doesn't everything have some sort of software glitch, problem?

Reply
 
 
Aug 23, 2021 14:21:12   #
Mark Sturtevant Loc: Grand Blanc, MI
 
I don't know what the future holds on this. But we were promised flying cars. I'm still waiting on those.

Reply
Aug 23, 2021 14:44:01   #
Chiroman8
 
Good article business section NY Times Monday 23,2021 Telsa" Add-On Kit gets New Scrutiny", very interesting!

Reply
Aug 23, 2021 14:45:18   #
srg
 
williejoha wrote:
What does this have to do with photography?
WJH


Willie, why don't you just set up some lighting, a tripod etc. and take a photo of this post with your camera? I promise that will make you feel better. But before doing that you might purchase the best lens for this project from a fellow hogger BUT ONLY IF you can find it in the "right' section.

Reply
Aug 23, 2021 15:42:09   #
dougwalter Loc: The Colony, TX
 
I'm not nearly as worried about Tesla's as I am about Freightliners, Navistars, Peterbilts, and Mack's.

Reply
 
 
Aug 23, 2021 16:23:08   #
napabob Loc: Napa CA
 
David Martin wrote:


nice payday for Cama and Zhu, well done lads.......

Reply
Aug 23, 2021 16:29:48   #
no12mo
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Unfortunately, when pilots aren't paying attention to what's going on, the plane crashes. I saw a crash investigation yesterday that involved a faulty altimeter. The plane thought it was about to land, so it cut power and flared the nose. The pilots were busy with their checklists and didn't notice the flashing warnings in front of them.


It's called "situational awareness." Bad things happen whether you are on the ground or in the air. Again, I don't see a problem with advances in one's driving experience. But you always have to be aware of your situation - on the road or in the air

Reply
Aug 23, 2021 16:31:56   #
no12mo
 
Tomfl101 wrote:
Human drivers make thousands of times more mistakes than the Tesla computers do. The software is still being developed and maybe it’s out a bit too soon but once it becomes ubiquitous we will all be much safer. Keep going Elon!



Reply
Aug 23, 2021 16:33:08   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
Here is the 60 Minutes story about autonomous big rig trucks. If you are a truck driver, you'd better start getting some other kind of job training.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/driverless-trucks-could-disrupt-the-trucking-industry-as-soon-as-2021-60-minutes-2021-08-15/

Reply
 
 
Aug 23, 2021 17:33:44   #
Tom Hungerford Loc: Thomaston CT
 
All excellent points. Well thought out. Some very serious questions.

Tom

Reply
Aug 23, 2021 17:39:08   #
aammatj Loc: Zebulon, NC / Roscoe, Ill
 
No answer is going to be perfect, but it seems the current state of software would dramatically reduce accidents and fatalities. Will it be perfect? Absolutely NOT. But it already is A LOT better than purely human drivers. Delaying its implementation simply costs more lives.

Reply
Aug 23, 2021 19:50:35   #
polyman
 
Bison Bud wrote:
Crashes of Telsa vehicles using their "Auto-Pilot' software have been in the news again lately and I am wondering how others feel about sharing our roads and highways with software driven vehicles. While I realize that the manufacturer says that the software is meant to reduce accidents and the percentage of crashes is still rather low, they are obviously not without errors. All in all, I find this "Auto-Pilot" trend to be a rather disturbing and I'm not sure I'm comfortable with the use of auto-pilot on our roads and highways at all. Sure human drivers make mistakes as well, but these computer driven vehicles can only do what they are programmed to do and I think it is impossible to write software that covers every possible scenario they may encounter. Anyway, is this really the wave of the future or is it possibly a misguided trend? Is the development of this kind of "Artificial Intelligence" really important enough to test it's use on our public roads and highways?

In any case, what are the laws that govern the use of this type of software and shouldn't we take a hard look at how we intend to proceed or not to proceed with this type of development before it goes much further? At least in my State, the operator of any motor vehicle must have a valid Operator's license, which requires at least some testing, etc. Do these computers have a license to operate in this manner or is just having a licensed operator on board enough to qualify, even if the licensed operator is paying no attention whatsoever? Frankly, there are enough technology distractions for drivers already and having auto-pilot available and by it's very nature and intent only encourages drivers to pay even less attention to the operation of their vehicle. I for one don't see how this is a good thing for all involved and I look forward to your responses on the subject. Good luck and good shooting to all.
Crashes of Telsa vehicles using their "Auto-P... (show quote)


I'm waiting to see one on ice and snow.

Reply
Aug 23, 2021 19:55:46   #
ShelbyDave Loc: Lone Rock, WI
 
williejoha wrote:
What does this have to do with photography?
WJH


Nothing, which is what this area is for. If it bothers you just go back to the photography sections. Have a good day.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.