Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Disturbing behavior by selfish photographers - CT Audubon
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Aug 20, 2021 07:43:39   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Humans and animals have never been able to get along.

Reply
Aug 20, 2021 07:57:54   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
imagemeister wrote:
Another sad commentary on human disturbance.....8-(
.



Reply
Aug 20, 2021 08:24:11   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
Bullfrog Bill wrote:
A baby Oystercatcher died of starvation and concern has risen about the well-being of shorebirds there.

August 16, 2021 — For the good of the shorebirds feeding and resting now at Milford Point, Connecticut Audubon has decided to schedule no group walks to the point's sandbar for the rest of August.

We are also asking for your help in giving the shorebirds room to feed and rest when you visit on your own.

On a morning two weeks ago, four photographers carried their equipment out to the sandbar.

To make sure they were close enough to get the photos they wanted, they settled onto the sand within 50 feet of two American Oystercatchers and their baby.

The baby oystercatcher was too young to fly and the parents were too attached to leave it on its own. Connecticut Audubon’s coastal ranger asked the photographers to please move farther away.

But they stayed. The birds were on high alert and distracted from resting, feeding and keeping cool in the midday heat.

By 1:30, shortly after the photographers’ four-hour stakeout, the baby American Oystercatcher was dead.

A necropsy showed that it starved to death.

Oystercatchers at Milford Point attempted 20 nests during the 2021 season.

Only one baby has survived.

This was just the latest example this summer of seemingly well-meaning visitors ignoring the warning signs, string fencing, and requests of Connecticut Audubon staff to birds on the sandbar the room they need to survive.

Walking, birding, and taking photos on the sandbar can unnecessarily disturb the shorebirds there.
A baby Oystercatcher died of starvation and concer... (show quote)


As a wildlife photographer I too have witnessed atrocities beyond the scope of human understanding. My group in Florida do not publish the locations of rare birds we photograph, we as a group know their whereabouts but keep the locations private.
If we come across a situation where a photographer or photographers are threatening wildlife we have the number of game officials on speed dial, the officers know us and our group and appreciate our information.
We also, when we post, remind the public on proper wildlife behavior and a general respect for it.
We also post the dangers wildlife face due to population infringement.
I have gotten in front of bad photographers and told them the dangers the wildlife face due to their actions, and I would say 99% of them back off because they lacked the knowledge to know the dangers of what they were doing.
We are polite and firm, if they insist we inform them that we have the numbers of wildlife officers who will support our desires and would it not be better for everyone involved to back off.
Like I said, most photographers do not realize how their actions impact the life of the wildlife they are photographing. And like I said, most of the time it ends up very well and most photographers thank us for informing them of the impact of what they are doing.
And our group continues to educate the public, and that's a big part of it. But their will always be those who feel they are above the need for caution.
In your case I would have reported them to the wildlife officers, and I would also have taken down their license numbers.
And further, I would have found out what their address was and sent them the dead bird in a box thanking them for killing it.
But that's just lovable me talking.

Reply
 
 
Aug 20, 2021 08:48:18   #
badapple Loc: Twin Lake, Michigan
 
Not all badapples are badapples 😄.

Reply
Aug 20, 2021 08:49:18   #
Saycheeze Loc: Ct
 
We need to know their names….

Reply
Aug 20, 2021 09:02:25   #
taffspride Loc: Originally Wales, now the Sunshine State
 
Parents need also to be reminded not to let their youngsters run into flocks of shorebirds to put them up. Despite warning signs all over the beach saying. "Do Not Disturb the birds." This happened on several occasions at Lido Beach Florida, while photographing Skimmers and their youngsters. We explained to the children and their parents what this could do to the fledglings who could not yet fly. Most were understanding. Then we spotted a women running through the birds screeching. "the birds, the birds, her friends were filming her and screeching with laughter. That time we were not quite so polite. Why can't people respect our wildlife?

Reply
Aug 20, 2021 09:09:35   #
Bullfrog Bill Loc: CT
 
Selfish and ignorant, a bad combination!

Reply
 
 
Aug 20, 2021 09:23:35   #
Mark Sturtevant Loc: Grand Blanc, MI
 
That really burns me up. There will be no shortage of people who want their own special up close and personal experience with wildlife, like they might see in Nat Geo or elsewhere.
I don't think they really understood the dire issue, and I hope they can be identified and fined.

Reply
Aug 20, 2021 10:09:41   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
Bullfrog Bill wrote:
A baby Oystercatcher died of starvation and concern has risen about the well-being of shorebirds there.

August 16, 2021 — For the good of the shorebirds feeding and resting now at Milford Point, Connecticut Audubon has decided to schedule no group walks to the point's sandbar for the rest of August.

We are also asking for your help in giving the shorebirds room to feed and rest when you visit on your own.

On a morning two weeks ago, four photographers carried their equipment out to the sandbar.

To make sure they were close enough to get the photos they wanted, they settled onto the sand within 50 feet of two American Oystercatchers and their baby.

The baby oystercatcher was too young to fly and the parents were too attached to leave it on its own. Connecticut Audubon’s coastal ranger asked the photographers to please move farther away.

But they stayed. The birds were on high alert and distracted from resting, feeding and keeping cool in the midday heat.

By 1:30, shortly after the photographers’ four-hour stakeout, the baby American Oystercatcher was dead.

A necropsy showed that it starved to death.

Oystercatchers at Milford Point attempted 20 nests during the 2021 season.

Only one baby has survived.

This was just the latest example this summer of seemingly well-meaning visitors ignoring the warning signs, string fencing, and requests of Connecticut Audubon staff to birds on the sandbar the room they need to survive.

Walking, birding, and taking photos on the sandbar can unnecessarily disturb the shorebirds there.
A baby Oystercatcher died of starvation and concer... (show quote)


These people were a-holes. There are times to zoom with the feet, and times not to. This was a time to zoom with lens or post.

They should have been fined and/or had their equipment confiscated. This is also the rangers fault. This kind of behavior should not be accepted. The photographers did not only show show noon respect for wildlife, but the law.

Thanks for sharing, as a reminder to all, stay back. to you and to the photographers and ranger.

Reply
Aug 20, 2021 10:25:52   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
I witnessed a really bad one when a group of photographers that were from the far east and pretended to not speak English, brought a step stool and ladder so that they could get up close to a hummingbird nest and take photos. They were putting their lenses literally 3 inches from the chicks. I tried to tell them that the parents are very upset and can't feed the chicks which have to be fed every 20 minutes. They acted like they didn't understand. I couldn't do much else because there are no officials that I could call that could respond. They are stretched really thin and are never in the area. I was ashamed to be a photographer that day because they were giving me and other photographers that respect wildlife a bad name.

Reply
Aug 20, 2021 10:48:51   #
gwilliams6
 
Brokenland wrote:
All it takes is a coupled of bad apples to ruin it for ALL photographers. Thank for reporting this, but sadly there's not enough media to keep people updated on topics like this and this isn't the first time issue like this have occurred. WE All must do our part to look out for one another.



Reply
 
 
Aug 20, 2021 11:07:49   #
LestheK
 
They should dunk the photographers in the ocean 4 time, but only take them up 3. Selfish terds.

Reply
Aug 20, 2021 11:29:23   #
george19
 
cedymock wrote:
Does the Connecticut Audubon’s coastal ranger not have authority to remove people that are not following regulations ?


I live close enough to this spot to want to go, but just never have…sailed out of Milford for 30 years. This appears to be state land, so yes…I would think the ranger has some authority. I hope there is an investigation of sorts. I haven’t seen anything in the paper.

In 2006 I was on the start of a trip (Nikon D100, 24-85 and 70-300, btw) in Sandspit BC. On the first day, after we all arrived, our guide (renowned university professor) led us on a short walk around the north end of the airport. He shortly pointed out an oystercatcher and its erratic movement. Then, based on the movements, designed to lure us away from the nest, he was able to find the eggs. Took a photo, moved on.

Let’s hope the rules for visiting the Milford preserve will change.

Reply
Aug 20, 2021 11:48:48   #
JeffDavidson Loc: Originally Detroit Now Los Angeles
 
Unfortunately, there are some very inconsiderate, self centered and uneducated people.

Reply
Aug 20, 2021 12:05:17   #
cahale Loc: San Angelo, TX
 
Bullfrog Bill wrote:
A baby Oystercatcher died of starvation and concern has risen about the well-being of shorebirds there.

August 16, 2021 — For the good of the shorebirds feeding and resting now at Milford Point, Connecticut Audubon has decided to schedule no group walks to the point's sandbar for the rest of August.

We are also asking for your help in giving the shorebirds room to feed and rest when you visit on your own.

On a morning two weeks ago, four photographers carried their equipment out to the sandbar.

To make sure they were close enough to get the photos they wanted, they settled onto the sand within 50 feet of two American Oystercatchers and their baby.

The baby oystercatcher was too young to fly and the parents were too attached to leave it on its own. Connecticut Audubon’s coastal ranger asked the photographers to please move farther away.

But they stayed. The birds were on high alert and distracted from resting, feeding and keeping cool in the midday heat.

By 1:30, shortly after the photographers’ four-hour stakeout, the baby American Oystercatcher was dead.

A necropsy showed that it starved to death.

Oystercatchers at Milford Point attempted 20 nests during the 2021 season.

Only one baby has survived.

This was just the latest example this summer of seemingly well-meaning visitors ignoring the warning signs, string fencing, and requests of Connecticut Audubon staff to birds on the sandbar the room they need to survive.

Walking, birding, and taking photos on the sandbar can unnecessarily disturb the shorebirds there.
A baby Oystercatcher died of starvation and concer... (show quote)


The problem with this is in the Ranger's action. You don't ask; you tell; and enforce it. A 12 gauge filled with salt might have worked.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.