dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia

?? Add "another"? I do not see the first photo?

CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City

If you don't <Unwatch>, your head will explode from the 2-day contributions ...

SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA

I was thinking the same thing but in my experience this is what Nikons do.

ELNikkor

Shooting in bright sunlight at ISO 2200?? Bring that down to ISO 100. Exposure comp. + 1/3 stop? Bring it to 0.0.
Aperture forced f2? Try f2.8 or f4. (Are you trying to blur the background with such a large aperture?)

dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia

Or shooting RAW. Or better both. Or reading Peterson then using auto ISO and shooting RAW because you now know why.

BebuLamar

I bet you would still have over exposure if you set the camera in A, ISO to 2200 and aperture f/2 and shoot in bright daylight. There is nothing wrong with the camera. The meter indication would be all the way to the Plus side and if you don't care then overexposure is what you get.

BebuLamar

Paul! I think in this case the OP needs a mirrorless camera. DSLR wouldn't do it.

TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC

Actually, I was referring to an either auto or program mode. Not owning this camera, I didn’t realize that it doesn’t have an auto mode (until checking the manual just now), so I amend my comment to choosing “P”. Until the OP does some reading and understands the various exposure controls, shooting in Program mode would at least give him usable exposures and perhaps give him a feel for the trade-offs between aperture, SS and ISO. And as mentioned later in the thread, auto ISO would have gone a long way toward saving the shot (although mixing multiple auto functions can give unpredictable results)

Wallen Loc: Middle Earth

The the exposure triangle is only about ISO, Shutter Speed & Aperture.
In A priority, The other "settings"; Shutter speed is adjusted by the camera and if on auto ISO, then that too will come into consideration.
How those will be set by the camera will depend on chosen exposure compensation & the metering sampling point/s in the image.

So generally if relying fully on A priority, it will only go whack if the compensation & metering is wrong, or the scenery is beyond the cameras capability.

I've posted that previously here.
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-686542-2.html

Needless to say, I only saw her post of the camera settings after I have replied and there were many good suggestions on it so I did not bother to follow up.
Still on closer examination, her setting falls on problem #1 there was a +0.3 compensation & #3- in her chosen setting, the scene is beyond the cameras Aperture Priority capability.
The metering was evaluative and the whole scene is bright so we can presume the camera is judging the light correctly so that part was not an issue.
She was on A (f2)but her ISO is not on auto and set too high. Too much that the shutter speed auto adjustment was not enough to compensate and the camera can not cope to bring the exposure correctly. Giving her an over exposed image. Should she want to intentionally retain that setting, an accessory like an ND filter will help the camera.

TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC

Maybe there is a scenario that would require a high ISO plus an ND filter, but I can’t think of one unless you specifically want to increase the noise in your image.

frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.

You're iso is way too high for a bright sunlight day. Set it to 100. I would keep it there all the time unless you can not get a good photo (dark) then raise it.

You're camera is maxed out at 1/8000 sec trying to get it right but can not. The photo is way overexposed. Note the histogram, far right. Normally you want it in the middle, untill you learn exposure and decide to vary from there.

You have some exposure comp also. Not much but it is also part of the problem.

To correct this, set iso to 100, compensation to 0. At f2, you will need a fast shutter speed, probably somewhere around 1/2000 or higher at f2. Why f2?

You need to study the exposure triangle untill you understand it. You want to learn how to control the light hitting the sensor. There is lots of info on this all over the internet. I would start here.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/the-exposure-triangle

This is another good site for learning.

https://backcountrygallery.com/

Edit: I was multitasking and my comments are duplicated... Took to look to to click send....

Wallen Loc: Middle Earth

The fact is it happened unintentionally hence she was confused and looking for a solution.
It really should not be done. As you say correctly, it is detrimental to the image quality.
But it is nice to know that even on such extreme, there are tools that can be used to expand the capability of the system. So why intentionally go there? Artistic experiment perhaps? Or boredom... LOL

PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA

Linda - I suspect there are 2 issues here:
1) how did it happen - you hit the nail on the head, but also
2) what to do with the shot taken. - Here is where the correction comes in.

tdozier3 Loc: Northern Illinois

Shoot full manual

BebuLamar

Metered manual. It's not better than A most of the time but it makes you watch the exposure indicator so you would know if it's overexposed. In the OP case I believe the exposure indicator did show overexposure but the OP didn't pay attention.