SuperflyTNT wrote:
When you have no clue what you’re talking about, (which is often and on many subjects), just keep spinning things and hope someone will buy it.
I have no spin...at any time.
You keep insisting I'm for this...not I.
I just posted it because a lawsuit of this scope is news...and yet...none of the major outlets are running it.
If in your informed opinion (which I have yet to see any credentials) it is ridiculous...
Then the best thing would be to allow it into court so it can be defeated once and for all.
Not hearing it...only gives it legs.
Or isn't that logical enough...
Canisdirus wrote:
I have no spin...at any time.
You keep insisting I'm for this...not I.
I just posted it because a lawsuit of this scope is news...and yet...none of the major outlets are running it.
If in your informed opinion (which I have yet to see any credentials) it is ridiculous...
Then the best thing would be to allow it into court so it can be defeated once and for all.
Not hearing it...only gives it legs.
Or isn't that logical enough...
You say you have no spin while you keep pushing this. You have not cited one reputable source that there are 1000 lawyers and 10,000 doctors involved. According to your logic the lizard men attacking from outer space must be real because the mainstream media isn’t reporting it.
SuperflyTNT wrote:
You say you have no spin while you keep pushing this. You have not cited one reputable source that there are 1000 lawyers and 10,000 doctors involved. According to your logic the lizard men attacking from outer space must be real because the mainstream media isn’t reporting it.
How am I pushing it?
What is a reputable source these days?
I'm not invested in the article...one way or the other...as much as you are.
I simply posted it because I found it interesting...and disturbing (my exact topic quote).
I will say if it or parts of it are true..the likelihood of trying to squash the proponents and the lawsuit would be astronomically high.
There is a lot of power and coin being redistributed through Covid. A LOT.
boberic wrote:
I have always asked the question----- How many died OF covid or With covid. As many of those who died had "underlying conditions" did those conditions kill them? Or was the virus the COD. There is no way to accurately answer my question, but that doesn't mean that covid is responsible for all the deaths attributed ti it.
That's why it is important to look at excess mortality rates. During the pandemic the number of deaths are increased well beyond the expected averages unless there are other (unrecognised) causes of those deaths then it is probable that Covid 19 is responsible. It seems unlikely, however, that there is a concurrent globally active reason for the increased death rates.
We are slowly overcoming a pandemic. There is nothing to say that another one should not start tomorrow. Has China got rid of it's wet markets? no - it hasn't! We are told that Covid-19 has not come from a laboratory - that only leaves the wet markets as the source.
“I googled” first mistake using big media controlled search. Eye opener I’d say!!
Bo0mer wrote:
I'm wondering what all this BS has to do with cameras.
What kind of a lens should the photographer use to get all of those thousands of people in one shot?
What tripe! Some people will parrot whatever they hear even if illogical or vapid rumor.
boberic wrote:
I have always asked the question----- How many died OF covid or With covid. As many of those who died had "underlying conditions" did those conditions kill them? Or was the virus the COD. There is no way to accurately answer my question, but that doesn't mean that covid is responsible for all the deaths attributed ti it.
You are "preaching to the choir". I've been stating this almost since day one. Somehow (by stupidity or abject ignorance) it has become a maxim that COVID kills. COVID doesn't kill anyone. It generates an immune response in the human body. Those responses in generally healthy folks provide defensive reactions which fight the virus. However, if a person has a compromised immune system, then all bets are off. A dear friend of mine had variously suffered lung cancer (lung removed), heart condition (a dozen stents implanted), and weakened kidneys from the aforementioned ailments. When he contracted COVID, he was immediately placed on a ventilator, and died shortly thereafter. Three major body systems were compromised, but COVID reactions accelerated his demise.
Influenza never killed anyone directly. The deaths were due to immune responses, and in many of those responses, the person's t-cells, white blood cell elevation and MRNA response, all combined to cause death by pneumonia, or massive congestive heart failure.
Death is a complicated process. But the "press" would have you believe that it's instantaneous event (only in the case of massive trauma, though).
For me, a red flag was raised by the fact that the pharmaceutical companies cannot be sued because of reactions to their vaccines.
47greyfox wrote:
Since Soren Dreier is a mystic, I guess science and modern medicine has stolen his thunder. P. T. Barnum was right....
This is an attack on the message giver and does nothing to address the message.
Canisdirus wrote:
How am I pushing it?
What is a reputable source these days?
I'm not invested in the article...one way or the other...as much as you are.
I simply posted it because I found it interesting...and disturbing (my exact topic quote).
I will say if it or parts of it are true..the likelihood of trying to squash the proponents and the lawsuit would be astronomically high.
There is a lot of power and coin being redistributed through Covid. A LOT.
You must think you’re some kind of illusionist, pushing. This with your left hand while your right hand keeps trying to distract and spin that you’re not pushing and spinning this. You say you’re not invested yet if you follow your posts in this case thread you won’t let up. It’s irresponsible to repost stuff like this without vetting it first. And even if the “10,000 doctors” part was true, (though it seems you’re initial post is the only source for that), you say 10,000 doctors can’t be wrong. Well there are somewhere between 10-15 million doctors in the world. I’m guessing that 0.1% of them can be wrong.
47greyfox
Loc: on the edge of the Colorado front range
SuperflyTNT wrote:
I googled this lawsuit and the link in this thread and a forum post are the only mentions of 1000 lawyers and 10,000 doctors. As far as I can tell it’s one lawyer.
Surprise, surprise! 🥴🤔🥸✔️
srron wrote:
For me, a red flag was raised by the fact that the pharmaceutical companies cannot be sued because of reactions to their vaccines.
From your post, I guess you haven't had the jabs - more fool you. The pharmaceutical companies have saved hundreds of thousands of lives from Covid-19. Understand this - there will always be someone somewhere who has a bad reaction to a drug - even to paracetamol. Don't get a job as a risk assessor.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.