Full frame lens on crop sensor camera ??
Mar 4, 2021 07:42:24 #
boberic wrote:
Heres proof that they work toether
Mar 4, 2021 07:51:04 #
mwsilvers wrote:
You aren't using the edges of a full frame lens wh... (show quote)
Yup.
(re: the edges - synonymous with using a <crop factor> telephoto.)
I'd use the lens(es) if they mount.
Mar 4, 2021 08:09:35 #
Mr.Ft wrote:
Is there any truth to this??
Thanks
Tom
Thanks
Tom
NO .......more fake news
Mar 4, 2021 08:23:10 #
Mr.Ft wrote:
My D7500 works quite well with my Sigma 150-600 Contemporary DG and my 50 1.8 AFS, both FX lensesHi, I was out shooting with my 80D and EF 100-400 ... (show quote)
Mar 4, 2021 08:40:44 #
When I purchased my first Canon 7D I started on UHH and realized that I would eventually upgrade my camera so I heeded the advice, buy good glass! I have only purchased EF lenses for the 7D. Several years later I upgraded to Canon 5D3 and all my glass worked perfectly; and still does on the 5D4.
On a crop sensor you are only using the cernter of any apeture on an EF lens, the best part of the optics. Keep doing what you are doing, it makes perfect sense.
On a crop sensor you are only using the cernter of any apeture on an EF lens, the best part of the optics. Keep doing what you are doing, it makes perfect sense.
Mar 4, 2021 08:43:45 #
bleirer wrote:
This is the video in question. Without personal attacks on the producer, can anyone tell why he is right or wrong?
https://youtu.be/S8-vfiq33R4
https://youtu.be/S8-vfiq33R4
In the past, most crop frame sensors had a greater pixel density (smaller pixel pitch) which results in a greater ability to show lens faults. This is because it is easier/cheaper to make high densities on a smaller sensor ! So, on full frame with less pixel density, these resolution faults become "hidden" - if you will - or less well perceived ( depending on the exact resolution of the lens) . This is why FF is perceived to be sharper - generally speaking. A lot of generalities here. Today, FF pixel densities CAN equal or surpass some/most crop sensors ! Manufacturing costs have come down and the willingness of people to pay higher prices has gone up !
.
Mar 4, 2021 08:57:06 #
imagemeister wrote:
NO .......more fake news
Mar 4, 2021 09:03:10 #
nervous2 wrote:
When they ask "getting anything good?" answer yes and that you just sold two for publication last week at $1000 per. 
Yeah, I'm not that interested in prolonging the conversation...LOL
Mar 4, 2021 09:10:11 #
imagemeister wrote:
In the past, most crop frame sensors had a greater... (show quote)
And, I think you will agree, that nothing coming out of an enlarging process - digital or analog, can compare with the detail, clarity and depth of an un-magnified contact print from an 8x10 or 11x14 negative. The the two crop cameras with high pixel densities - 32mp Canon 90D (9.81 MP/cm²) and the 28mp Samsung NX1 - (7.66 MP/cm²) have really high pixel densities - but the full frame resolution champ, the 61 mp Sony a7R IV (7.18 MP/cm²) comes pretty close to the Samsung.
Mar 4, 2021 10:06:37 #
Mr.Ft wrote:
Hi, I was out shooting with my 80D and EF 100-400 ... (show quote)
Not true. I’ve used an EF lens with my 60D for years and sold some pictures using a 100-400 with that camera that were tack sharp.
Mar 4, 2021 10:20:03 #
xt2
Loc: British Columbia, Canada
Mr.Ft wrote:
Hi, I was out shooting with my 80D and EF 100-400 ... (show quote)
Inaccurate and all very silly.
Cheers!
Mar 4, 2021 10:26:47 #
quixdraw wrote:
I habitually shoot FX lenses on my DX cameras - results are better than with most DX lenses I've used.
This is what I do too. If you have both full frame and crop bodies, just buy the lens for the full frame and use it on the crop and full frame body. Or just buy a full frame lens and skip the crop sensor lenses if you have the $$$. One exception is when weight and size (for travel) reqquires the smallest lightest system.
Mar 4, 2021 10:32:43 #
There was an interesting topic here recently on dynamic range in which Bill Claff of photonstophotos.net participated. One of my takeaways from his comments was that you have to normalize for image size and viewing distance before you can really compare two systems. This holds true for dynamic range, depth of field, sharpness, noise, you name it. This makes it very hard to make blanket judgements across systems. But it does seem as a general rule that after normalizing if the sensor area is a little smaller then the lens must resolve a little better in the exposed part of the image circle to get equivalent results. Little being the keyword here. Still I'm sure the EF100-400ii is plenty up to the task, and there aren't any ef-s alternatives anyway.
Mar 4, 2021 10:36:34 #
Mr.Ft wrote:
Hi, I was out shooting with my 80D and EF 100-400 ... (show quote)
He was miss informed. The difference is, the ff glass has a bigger circle, and your crop sensor will only see a part of (crops) what the glass sends to it. Looking through your view finder, you will still see what the sensor sees.
Mar 4, 2021 10:37:48 #
Picture Taker
Loc: Michigan Thumb
A full frame lens works on both. I recommend to people that if you do not have a full frame camera that they DO buy a full frame lens and NOT buy a (S) non full frame lens as when you grow and buy a full frame camera you will not have to replace your lenses.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.