FrankR wrote:
Thank you for the information, informative to say the least. I couldn’t get the National Geographic link to work, but the other two were more than enough. No bubbles busted, you backed up your statement with evidence. We would all be better off if everybody did that. While it doesn’t specifically mention that none of the livestock were eaten, it’s logical to presume three wolves are not going to eat 100+ sheep. Thanks again.
Your welcome....and since these types of incidents never make the national news, people just don't believe it...and there are more if I had wanted to take the time to look for the links.