Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Moderna Vaccine Trial Report
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
Feb 6, 2021 16:55:16   #
ricardo00
 
awesome14 wrote:
I haven't been able to discover whether the first and second shots are exactly the same composition. I know with certain immunizations the initial shot is different than subsequent ones. I'm nearly certain that the first shot programs the body to recognize the virus, and to produce antibodies. And the second one is purely to stimulate antibody production.


For Moderna and Pfizer, they are the same exact composition. It is a bit more complex than that, their are lymphocytes (T cells and B cells), macrophages and memory cells, etc that are being stimulated as well.

Reply
Feb 6, 2021 17:53:02   #
David Martin Loc: Cary, NC
 
awesome14 wrote:
I haven't been able to discover whether the first and second shots are exactly the same composition. I know with certain immunizations the initial shot is different than subsequent ones. I'm nearly certain that the first shot programs the body to recognize the virus, and to produce antibodies. And the second one is purely to stimulate antibody production.


For Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, dose 1 and dose 2 are identical. Each dose consists of a strand of viral messenger RNA surrounded by a protective lipid nanoparticle coat.

The vaccine works by programming the immune system to recognize the protein spike on the surface of the virus (rather than recognizing the whole virus), and ultimately via antigen-presenting cells and helper T cells, will cause B cells to make antibodies specifically against the spike protein, and hopefully program T killer cells to kill any cells infected with the virus.

Reply
Feb 6, 2021 20:04:38   #
Scruples Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
Runninglate wrote:
I am not a scientist or specialist in contagious diseases but they recommend the second shot and I am following their advice and getting my second shot today.


As a pharmacist, I have been following this Pandemic since its inception. While the statistics are difficult to understand, the human immune system is complex and has many features some of which are redundant. To insure the best possible opportunity for the human body to establish a sufficient antibody titer, the secondary dose is necessary. There are other vaccines that require "booster" doses. In a simplified explanation, the second dose is a reminder for the immune system as to what it needs to do. Many people have chosen not to take the second dose after they have had a reaction to the first dose. Upon receipt of the first dose, I did not experience any adverse effects. I am not sure if the second dose may cause me to feel any untoward reaction. I will know in a few days. As further post marketing surveillance is performed, more knowledge will be gained.

Reply
 
 
Feb 6, 2021 20:07:27   #
Scruples Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
David Martin wrote:
For Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, dose 1 and dose 2 are identical. Each dose consists of a strand of viral messenger RNA surrounded by a protective lipid nanoparticle coat.

The vaccine works by programming the immune system to recognize the protein spike on the surface of the virus (rather than recognizing the whole virus), and ultimately via antigen-presenting cells and helper T cells, will cause B cells to make antibodies specifically against the spike protein, and hopefully program T killer cells to kill any cells infected with the virus.
For Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, dose 1 and dose 2... (show quote)


This is correct but it is very difficult to explain to many people even medical personnel. I must commend you for explaining the vaccine in a manner I did my best to avoid everyone from skipping past.

Reply
Feb 6, 2021 21:38:49   #
Dossile
 
IDguy wrote:
Found this today from the phase 3 study on Moderna:

“Investigators observed 236 cases of symptomatic COVID-19 among participants at least 14 days after they received their first shot, with 225 cases in the placebo group and 11 cases in the group receiving mRNA-1273. The vaccine efficacy was 95.2% for this secondary analysis.”

So it looks like we’re 95% good after first shot. One has to wonder why the second? They could be vaccinating twice as many people.

But that sentence confounds me as they go on to report 196 cases after both shots...also mostly in placebo participants. So more people got it in the two weeks between the first and second shot than during the rest of the six month study?

Or does it mean 196 of the total 236 cases occurred after the second shot? If so that seems odd as 40 cases in two weeks vs. 196 in next 5+ months among placebo group would be a heck of a placebo effect.

We will get our second shot and keep up distancing and masking until the disease is banished from the earth...but just wondering.
Found this today from the phase 3 study on Moderna... (show quote)


I have read many of the reports, and also critiques of the reports, provided by both Pfizer and Moderna. The second dose is important in establishing near universal absolute immunity. The first dose provides immunity to a significant part of the population but still allows for many to become infected. No person infected after receiving the first dose of vaccine has ended up in the hospital though. So even just getting one dose is important in preventing severe infections. I’m always grateful when people say they are getting vaccinated. A COVID infection is very dangerous, a COVID vaccine is not without risks, but is not terribly dangerous.

The immune system is extremely complex and very incompletely understood. We will learn a lot from COVID. But in regards to basics there are two main forms of infectious immunity, cellular and humoral. One is created by cells attacking infectious organisms (cellular). The other type of immunity is created by cells creating compound proteins (immunoglobulins like IgG and IgM) that latch onto the organisms and allow the body to destroy the organisms (humoral). When people talk about serum levels, they are talking about levels of immunoglobulins. The cellular immunity is every bit as important as humoral immunity and is more difficult to measure with tests. Both forms of immunity are created with the COVID vaccines and the second dose seems important for establishing both forms of immunologic memory, but possibly more so for cellular immunity. I expect that we will may get a third dose, a booster, in 8-10 months, but that is personal conjecture at this stage.

Reply
Feb 7, 2021 07:13:17   #
nervous2 Loc: Provo, Utah
 
Had first Moderna injection 3 weeks ago and scheduled for second next Friday. Very grateful to be able to get both. I understand that reaction to second can be significantly greater than reaction to first, which in my case was not bad.

Reply
Feb 7, 2021 07:54:09   #
sodapop Loc: Bel Air, MD
 
awesome14 wrote:
I haven't been able to discover whether the first and second shots are exactly the same composition. I know with certain immunizations the initial shot is different than subsequent ones. I'm nearly certain that the first shot programs the body to recognize the virus, and to produce antibodies. And the second one is purely to stimulate antibody production.


The nurse who gave me the first shot told me that the vaccine is exactly the same. You get a total of 1 cc, half the first shot half the second She stated that that provides optimal performance.

Reply
 
 
Feb 7, 2021 08:06:46   #
jackm1943 Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
 
IDguy wrote:
Found this today from the phase 3 study on Moderna:

“Investigators observed 236 cases of symptomatic COVID-19 among participants at least 14 days after they received their first shot, with 225 cases in the placebo group and 11 cases in the group receiving mRNA-1273. The vaccine efficacy was 95.2% for this secondary analysis.”

So it looks like we’re 95% good after first shot. One has to wonder why the second? They could be vaccinating twice as many people.

But that sentence confounds me as they go on to report 196 cases after both shots...also mostly in placebo participants. So more people got it in the two weeks between the first and second shot than during the rest of the six month study?

Or does it mean 196 of the total 236 cases occurred after the second shot? If so that seems odd as 40 cases in two weeks vs. 196 in next 5+ months among placebo group would be a heck of a placebo effect.

We will get our second shot and keep up distancing and masking until the disease is banished from the earth...but just wondering.
Found this today from the phase 3 study on Moderna... (show quote)


I'm not certain I can follow the numbers but, virtually always, you will have better immunity to any vaccine following a booster, even if the first dose provides some protection.

Reply
Feb 7, 2021 08:18:36   #
OnDSnap Loc: NE New Jersey
 
IDguy wrote:
Found this today from the phase 3 study on Moderna:

“Investigators observed 236 cases of symptomatic COVID-19 among participants at least 14 days after they received their first shot, with 225 cases in the placebo group and 11 cases in the group receiving mRNA-1273. The vaccine efficacy was 95.2% for this secondary analysis.”

So it looks like we’re 95% good after first shot. One has to wonder why the second? They could be vaccinating twice as many people.

But that sentence confounds me as they go on to report 196 cases after both shots...also mostly in placebo participants. So more people got it in the two weeks between the first and second shot than during the rest of the six month study?

Or does it mean 196 of the total 236 cases occurred after the second shot? If so that seems odd as 40 cases in two weeks vs. 196 in next 5+ months among placebo group would be a heck of a placebo effect.

We will get our second shot and keep up distancing and masking until the disease is banished from the earth...but just wondering.
Found this today from the phase 3 study on Moderna... (show quote)


Perhaps do to the persistence of the virus, where one shot won't win the war on training the immune system to recognize the virus, build the antibodies and battle it the next time it rears it's nasty head. Just a guess. BTW, It will never be banished so long as there are those who don't wear masks, socially distance from others and refuse the vaccine.

Reply
Feb 7, 2021 09:35:25   #
David Martin Loc: Cary, NC
 
OnDSnap wrote:
BTW, It will never be banished so long as there are those who don't wear masks, socially distance from others and refuse the vaccine.

Even those measures may not be enough to "banish" the virus. Because viruses may not simply go away.

For example, the 1918 influenza virus ("Spanish flu") never went away. Gene sequencing has shown that the same strain of flu that caused the 1918 pandemic is the ancestor of every subsequent seasonal flu:

“You can still find the genetic traces of the 1918 virus in the seasonal flus that circulate today,” says Taubenberger. “Every single human infection with influenza A in the past 102 years is derived from that one introduction of the 1918 flu.”
https://www.history.com/news/1918-flu-pandemic-never-ended

And although most flu seasons are not pandemics, the 1957, 1968 and 2009 seasons were particularly lethal. We should be prepared for a similar scenario with SARS-Cov-2 (Covid-19).

Reply
Feb 7, 2021 10:23:59   #
patman1 Loc: Pataskala, Ohio
 
Just a quick question, does anyone wonder why on the box or bottle, it's not called a vaccine?
I recently saw a video of Bill Gates in conference showing the CIA the vaccine he has developed to alter ones DNA, very convincing I think everyone should view it and make their own decisions, me I decided not to take the vaccine, I'm in Gods hands! Stay safe, stay well, be careful

Reply
 
 
Feb 7, 2021 10:30:04   #
patman1 Loc: Pataskala, Ohio
 
If anyone is interested in seeing the video I can forward the link in messenger! Advise

Reply
Feb 7, 2021 10:49:40   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
patman1 wrote:
Just a quick question, does anyone wonder why on the box or bottle, it's not called a vaccine?
I recently saw a video of Bill Gates in conference showing the CIA the vaccine he has developed to alter ones DNA, very convincing I think everyone should view it and make their own decisions, me I decided not to take the vaccine, I'm in Gods hands! Stay safe, stay well, be careful


Good. Others more deserving will get it. And you are might help the gene pool.

When I see these views I remind myself half the population are below average intelligence. And some way below.

I just hope you do not kill too many others by spreading it.

Reply
Feb 7, 2021 10:55:20   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
sodapop wrote:
The nurse who gave me the first shot told me that the vaccine is exactly the same. You get a total of 1 cc, half the first shot half the second She stated that that provides optimal performance.


They obviously are not “exactly” the same. If they were the storage conditions and interval between shots would be the same.

It might be fair to say the way they work is similar. And even similar enough that the CDC experts advise you can mix and match and get a similar result. That is, the second shot can be the other vaccine from the first. There is no testing to support that idea but it must be a logical guess by those who know a lot more about this than I do.

Reply
Feb 7, 2021 10:59:19   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
sodapop wrote:
The nurse who gave me the first shot told me that the vaccine is exactly the same. You get a total of 1 cc, half the first shot half the second She stated that that provides optimal performance.


Oh, and as I understand it the doses are very different too.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.