Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Dumber Than AOC???
Page <<first <prev 3 of 17 next> last>>
Jan 31, 2021 10:15:20   #
BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere
 
Wyantry wrote:


It is pretty damn plain this is a direct promotion of legalized robbery or aggravated robbery without the right of self defense or utilization of deadly force.



OH, PLEASE!

FIRST! - Look at what state this bill is in. THAT by itself should have told you "end of story".
SECOND! - When it rains, it's pretty damn plain the end of the world is upon us.

Note to myself: Where did all these crazy people come from?

Reply
Jan 31, 2021 10:28:30   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
Texcaster wrote:
That's all you do. You realize you'll never get to boss around convicts again don't you?


Apparently Rong's comment was actually directed at you and not me. I will be sure he is made aware of his error.

Dennis

Reply
Jan 31, 2021 10:33:56   #
BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere
 
berchman wrote:
Twenty years ago I satisfied one of my fantasies by spending a lot of money taking courses in self defense. In two of the courses I was the only civilian. Courses taken were in shotgun, rifle, handgun, knife, pepper spray, and unarmed self defense. These skills are very perishable so with the passage of time I remember only:
1. All guns are loaded.
2. Don't point the gun at anything you don't intend to shoot.
3. Finger off the trigger until ready to shoot.
4. Run away whenever possible so you don't become bride of Mongo.
5. Shout "Police; drop your weapon" if you have to shoot so that witnesses can testify that you called the police.
Twenty years ago I satisfied one of my fantasies b... (show quote)



#4 is funny! You are correct but, it's still funny.

Glad you remember these points.

Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2021 10:45:54   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
BooIsMyCat wrote:
Nope! "I'm" not saying that at all. As usual, you don't pay attention nor do you think things through.

First, IF you had read further into this issue, you might have noticed that it's not very likely it will pass... probably won't even get a chance to be voted on.

Secondly, I have guns and I am fully trained/prepared to defend myself, my family & my property.

Thirdly, I wouldn't support this because it's not addressing the issues that I think are much more important such as training & SAFE USE of a weapon.


Example: Remember the man/wife nut-jobs that were "defending their rights" during a peaceful protest? Do you remember seeing (visual proof) the wife with her finger on the trigger of her pistol? Do you remember seeing (again, visual proof) the husband pointing is weapon in her direction? Neither of them should own a gun, let alone handle one because they don't know the FIRST thing about proper safety procedures. BOTH of them could have killed some innocent bystander and HE could have killed his own wife. That they did not is NOT the issue here.

Another example: I was in Cordova, TN when two guys got into an argument at a Panera restaurant over parking too close to each other. One went to his vehicle, got his gun, came back and shot/killed the other guy - in front of that guys two children. The shooter said he was "defending himself"... two families destroyed over one "tough guy with a gun" who now has plenty of time on his hands to think about what he did.


Just because the 2nd Amendment says one has the "right" doesn't mean everyone is of sound mind enough to where they should have a gun.

Besides, though they tend to get less attention than gun-related murders, suicides have long accounted for the majority of U.S. gun deaths. In 2017, six-in-ten gun-related deaths in the U.S. were suicides.


How many of you Rambo's have actually used your weapon to defend yourself, family or home?
How many of you actually know of someone who did?

Your rational doesn't hold water. How many people do you know that have been held up by someone using force, like you say? I'm not saying it couldn't happen. It's just not a valid argument. That's just an NRA arguing point. It's BS.
Nope! "I'm" not saying that at all. As u... (show quote)


Of course you are going way off track here to defend the indefensible. Even if I was somewhat wrong with my post, you admitted that it was even more stupid than I had pointed out. The thought of someone on the Left actually telling Americans they have to retreat from robbers on the street when they have the common sense right to defend themselves is ridiculous. Surely you really know that but are just being your normal self, fight anything said by someone on the Right even if what they say is common sense. You STILL take that idiot politicians word for things while then telling us you would fight for you and yours. Of course you would and so SHOULD every person on the planet. Every person has a right to their own self defense no matter if it is on the street or on their property. Yet you side with the Left.

As an ex cop I have spoken to a great many people who have been robbed in their home through burglary, a couple of home invaders and some on the street. I have suggested that every one of those people buy a gun, learn to use it and then if the opportunity presents itself the next time to actually use it against their attackers or thieves. I truly believe in the Castle Doctrine type of law. While you seem not to admit it you just did when you said you own guns and would use them to protect you and yours.

You do this BS all the time. Even when your ideas and mine are the same you put down my ideas while standing firm for yours. Are you afraid the Left Wing language police will come after you, will they take away your Left Wing card or your secret decoding ring. Is there a secret Winky Dink screen for Democrats you use to receive messages from your television? Might I suggest it is you who needs to take a look at what you are telling people because it isn't right, it is not common sense. Either that OR like a typical corrupt Left Winger you want laws enforced for me but not for thee. You want to have guns, want to protect yourself but are all uppity when those of us on the other side of the aisle do so.

As a firearms instructor for both police and civilians I don't disagree about safe handling of firearms. As for your comment about the parking lot incident where a man was killed, there are also a number of road rage incidents where one vehicle rammed the other vehicle. There is violence all across America. That is why I carry a firearm, not to shoot someone but to be sure someone does not shoot me. Violence will never be stopped. Surely you agree there are many people who should never be allowed behind the wheel of a vehicle; and yet...there they are.
But your safety comment has nothing much to do with what the Left Wing politician wanted to pass for a law.

Yes it may not pass nor even get voted on. Of course I get that. But the point is you still seem to support some of what she said. Perhaps it is you and not me who is not listening, not paying attention.

We seem to agree on much in this thread and yet here you are, as per your usual, coming across guns blazing over nothing while doing your best to put me down. Why do you do that? There ARE times when both sides of the aisle can agree on something yet your attitude makes that impossible. Must be a corrupt Left Wing thing.

Dennis

Reply
Jan 31, 2021 11:22:42   #
papakatz45 Loc: South Florida-West Palm Beach
 
Kraken wrote:
As is everything he posts.


Do you agree with her? Please, no smart remarks. Just trying to understand your viewpoint.

Reply
Jan 31, 2021 11:24:45   #
John_F Loc: Minneapolis, MN
 
I consider myself to be a liberal progressive, and am having trouble understanding Meza’s reasoning. Too complicated to go further.

Reply
Jan 31, 2021 11:47:13   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
BooIsMyCat wrote:
OH, PLEASE!

FIRST! - Look at what state this bill is in. THAT by itself should have told you "end of story".
SECOND! - When it rains, it's pretty damn plain the end of the world is upon us.

Note to myself: Where did all these crazy people come from?


They ALL came from the corrupt Democratic Party. There, that answers that question for you. Let's not forget that it was this corrupt Left Wing woman that submitted this Bill. No matter whether or not it might actually pass, SHE wants it to pass and she is a Democrat. You say you have the same beliefs as I do, that you will protect you and yours with a firearm if necessary and yet you don't have the guts to actually come out and tell us this woman and her idea is ridiculous.

Dennis

Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2021 11:55:28   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
berchman wrote:
The advice came from Massad Ayoob. I say that I was CALLING FOR the police.

And the advice is wrong.

YOU typed 5. Shout "Police; drop your weapon" if you have to shoot so that witnesses can testify that you called the police.

Where is it mentioned that you are not the police?
'Freeze: I called the police' is rather different from 'Police: drop your weapon'.
Also, witnesses do not give a rat ass of what you scream like a little girl. Your phone record on the other hand will be proof enough in both cases.

'Freeze: I called the police' would stop whomever on their track: They would be laughing their asses off.
Also, in case you are not aware of it, self-defence does not include making a threat before opening fire.

But then again for you and your ilk, "I have a weapon and will use it." is all you need as justification.

Reply
Jan 31, 2021 12:06:19   #
Rose42
 
Rongnongno wrote:
And the advice is wrong.

YOU typed 5. Shout "Police; drop your weapon" if you have to shoot so that witnesses can testify that you called the police.

Where is it mentioned that you are not the police?
'Freeze: I called the police' is rather different from 'Police: drop your weapon'.
Also, witnesses do not give a rat ass of what you scream like a little girl. Your phone record on the other hand will be proof enough in both cases.

'Freeze: I called the police' would stop whomever on their track: They would be laughing their asses off.
Also, in case you are not aware of it, self-defence does not include making a threat before opening fire.

But then again for you and your ilk, "I have a weapon and will use it." is all you need as justification.
And the advice is wrong. br br b YOU typed /b ... (show quote)


Do you have any experience with self defense?

Reply
Jan 31, 2021 12:20:19   #
Leo_B Loc: Houston suburb
 
Meza is one of the many poster children of dumber than dirt leftist morons.

Reply
Jan 31, 2021 12:23:07   #
berchman Loc: South Central PA
 
What I do know is that the very last thing you want to do is to shoot someone unless the alternative is your being killed. Because the cops will arrest you, no matter what your story, and they will let the DA and the courts decide on whether you were justified. The only exception might be if you are a little old lady and your assailant was a large male of color. In that instance the cops might not arrest you. Better to throw your decoy wallet on the ground and run like hell if you can. Better to be robbed than killed. Better to be robbed than have to spend time in jail, maybe raped or otherwise assaulted before you get out on bail, lots of money to hire a competent criminal lawyer, lots of money to defend the civil suit for damages brought by the criminal's family.

Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2021 12:32:47   #
Alafoto Loc: Montgomery, AL
 
dennis2146 wrote:
You, my BFF, are saying that you agree with the Texas politician in the article that homeowners, actually everyone should just allow criminals to take whatever they want with no repercussions, no arrests, no protection FOR homeowners and so on so that those among us who are bent on criminal and violent behavior will be sated and not harm us. Of course the upside it would seem to you and your Left Wing cowards is that those who are too lazy to work will have their demands met while the rest of us will have to keep working to replace whatever these criminals have stolen. Sounds like you and that POS pussified Obama are of the same mindset.

On the other hand it sounds pretty much that it is you and this idiotic politician who are of ridiculous mindset and not me.

Dennis
You, my BFF, are saying that you agree with the Te... (show quote)


If the politicians are going to steal from us with impunity, surely the non-elected criminals deserve no less.

Reply
Jan 31, 2021 12:39:49   #
Amielee Loc: Eastern Washington State
 
berchman wrote:
What I do know is that the very last thing you want to do is to shoot someone unless the alternative is your being killed. Because the cops will arrest you, no matter what your story, and they will let the DA and the courts decide on whether you were justified. The only exception might be if you are a little old lady and your assailant was a large male of color. In that instance the cops might not arrest you. Better to throw your decoy wallet on the ground and run like hell if you can. Better to be robbed than killed. Better to be robbed than have to spend time in jail, maybe raped or otherwise assaulted before you get out on bail, lots of money to hire a competent criminal lawyer, lots of money to defend the civil suit for damages brought by the criminal's family.
What I do know is that the very last thing you wan... (show quote)


What you say is true in some jurisdictions. There are places in the U.S. where that is not true. Not all police depts. will arrest you in cases of self defense and not all DAs will charge you. Before you use armed force to defend yourself know the policies in your area. Even self defense in some jurisdictions could cost you a great deal of money even if found not guilty, and in others could get you honors.

Reply
Jan 31, 2021 12:44:19   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
Rongnongno wrote:
Actually this will land you in jail. YOU ARE NOT THE POLICE.

Witnesses know nothing, sorry, just that you shot and impersonated a police officer.


From your poorly written comment you make it seem as if the other member shot a police officer and impersonated a police officer.

Now take a look at the real world, not your make believe world. Had the man actually been a victim in an armed street robbery and then yelled, POLICE, before shooting the criminal, nobody on the planet would ever charge him with impersonating a police officer. There would be no jail time on that point anywhere. Of course there would be an investigation as to whether or not it was a lawful shooting but I doubt he would even be held overnight in a jail. You may be right or wrong about what witnesses would say. There may have been no witnesses at all in this story. But in the end, who cares. What would be the most important fact about this story is that the good guy would have shot and stopped/killed an armed robber who meant him harm. The good guy, the honest citizen, would be alive to go home to his family. Are you unable to see that fact or is your Left Winger thought process not allowing you to see the common sense point in all of this. As I asked the little Boocat, are you FOR the bad guy stealing property from honest citizens? Are you against honest citizens protecting themselves? Seems as if you are or you would not be carrying on with these ridiculous comments.

Dennis

Reply
Jan 31, 2021 12:44:43   #
FrumCA
 
dennis2146 wrote:
Can it be possible for someone to be dumber than AOC?

In Texas, State Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state's "castle doctrine." This doctrine allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder who breaks into his home.

Now listen to what she has to say . . .

"I'm not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained. "All I'm saying is that it doesn't warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed."

Meza was quick to reassure that her bill "would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves.

Under the new law, the homeowner's obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner's responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner."

"In most instances, the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does," Meza reasoned. "The homeowner's insurance will reimburse their losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better.”

Dennis
Can it be possible for someone to be dumber than A... (show quote)

Definitely proves that liberalism is a mental disorder!! Let's see how many fools on the left side of the aisle in congress support this idiocy!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 17 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.