Is the Nikon 200-500 f5.6 good enough?
Jan 4, 2021 11:15:07 #
Jan 4, 2021 11:39:39 #
water falls wrote:
Great shot,My primary lens on my d500.
So glad this was on here. I am thinking about buying this lens and have been researching. But nothing like getting my answer from someone who owns it. I have a D5oo also and mainly use my 70-200 for everything. Do you shoot yours handheld? And would it be fast enough for some sports? I was considering the 80-400 but from what I've read this one would be better. Thanks
Jan 4, 2021 12:35:54 #
I shoot all pictures handheld once in awhile on a windy day I will use my wife’s shoulder
on long shots.
on long shots.
Jan 4, 2021 12:53:05 #
Jan 4, 2021 14:12:07 #
Jan 4, 2021 14:18:29 #
Jan 4, 2021 14:33:37 #
Looks shap to me. I have the 200-500 and have not been disappointed.
Jan 4, 2021 14:48:41 #
Jan 4, 2021 15:00:35 #
Jan 4, 2021 17:00:32 #
Wow, I think this is a great photo, very clear and way more than "good enough"! Thanks for sharing.
Jan 4, 2021 18:06:59 #
Jan 4, 2021 19:29:11 #
Jan 4, 2021 19:50:27 #
Jan 4, 2021 20:05:35 #
wapiti wrote:
Well, it is for me. First and foremost, I cannot afford the high dollar prime Nikons. Secondly, my needs are modest. I post some wildlife images on social media and place a few 16x20 canvas photos on my wall at home. Occasionally, not often, I will enter an image in a contest. This is an image @ 500mm, 1/200, f5.6, ISO900
beautiful shot of that handsome buck.
Jan 4, 2021 20:31:52 #
wapiti wrote:
Well, it is for me. First and foremost, I cannot afford the high dollar prime Nikons. Secondly, my needs are modest. I post some wildlife images on social media and place a few 16x20 canvas photos on my wall at home. Occasionally, not often, I will enter an image in a contest. This is an image @ 500mm, 1/200, f5.6, ISO900
Passes with flying colors! . . . .
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.