CHG_CANON wrote:
LOL CO!!!
You don't seem to be keeping up with Rockwell. From his website news dated Dec 23, 2020:
Sayonara, Nikon
If you believe what you read from random sources on the Internet, Nikon has fallen on such hard times that it can't afford skilled labor in Japan, and instead is going to offshore everything it does to places where less-skilled people will work cheaper.
I upgraded to Canon in 2013. I've only shot Nikon for nostalgia with my manual-focus lenses ever since, for the most part.
If you don't like this news, vote with your feet and upgrade to Canon as I did. Especially in full-frame mirrorless, Canon is a better company with better products, better support and better domestic Japanese manufacturing.
Supposedly Nikon's not going to make anything domestically in Japan anymore, and will be offshoring everything elsewhere, like Thailand or China, by the end of next year. Nikon's been offshoring more and more over the years, which is among the many reasons I upgraded to Canon.
I'm not the only one who feels this way; this is part of the reason the EOS R5 is still sold out and to get one you have to place your order and be patient.
Like many of you I've owned and shot Nikon every day since 1983. I own or have owned and often reviewed everything they've ever made from 1946 through today. I upgraded to pro Nikon in 1983 from Minolta because all of Nikon's AI and AI-s lenses were all made to pro standards, while Canon's FD lenses varied in mechanical quality depending on how expensive they were.
Well, it hasn't been 1983 for a very long time. Nikon fell to second place behind Canon in the 1990s, and to third behind Sony in the 2010s.
Of course I'm still going to review everything they introduce because you people keep asking. Let's face it; digital cameras are disposable so it doesn't really matter how well they're made. Lenses, however, should last a lifetime, which I doubt from the plastic offshores Nikon sells today. Plastic lenses take great pictures, but I have a problem with new-age thinking that accepts that after ten years you throw a lens away.
Here's the thing about making things in China: they should be close to free. If Nikon wants to offshore and pass the savings on to me, that's one thing, but if they prefer to pocket the profit for themselves and try to gyp me with a made-in-Japan price, fugettaboutit. When a Chinese company makes something domestically in China, like the TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH I'm reviewing, it sells for less than 10% of the same product made in the first world does, and performs about the same. As at least third generation native New Yorker, I don't like being taken for a ride, being sold offshores for the same price as the real thing. You may not care, but I care where my goodies are made. I wear American-made sneakers and even my Bluetooth headphones are Made in GERMANY.
color=red LOL CO!!! /color br br You don't seem... (
show quote)
Nikon manufacturing in Thailand is nothing new. They've had a plant there since 1991. Even digital cameras as far back as the D50 (released in 2005) have been manufactured in Thailand.
Why do I want Canon? The ergonomics are terrible. There are buttons of all different shapes plastered helter- skelter all over. It's no better than some industrial tool. Nikon ergonomics are much superior.
Canon sensors have always been about one generation behind other manufacturers. They simply cannot manufacture sensors as well as Sony. Canon should give up and start purchasing sensors from Sony for the best performance.
My second choice behind Nikon is Sony.
I don't want Canon garbage. If you want it, buy as many as you want.