Rolk wrote:
Great images, Pat! Unfortunately, my Canon EOS60D doesn't do "in camera" doubles, so I'll have to rely on Photoshop, but I did want to say, as a former wedding photographer (many, many, many years ago), it was so much easier to do doubles on film, and clients would pay extra for well executed ones. I wish I had some of those, but the only "in camera" double I have is one I've posted many times before, so I hope you don't mind.
Tim
Loved it when I first saw it and still do..