ronichas wrote:
Your opinion is not out of fashion. Sometimes with some images the skies work. In some images they don't . I use my own skies when I replace them. I take lots of skies, label them from the location, and then I use my own skies.
:)
Roni:
Thanks to you, I am building quite the sky library too.
Sometimes when you travel many hours by plane and spend a lot of dollar$ on a trip to Australia.
Then you get there and it rains a few days leaving you with gray dingy skies in a lot of your prized photos.
Hey, if it's a once in a lifetime trip because I'm not ever going to sit on an airplane that long ever again if I can help it.
Well then, your photos become creative memories. In such cases, I embrace the creative, I change the sky out with something I find suitable.
However, what about adjusting exposure, contrast, WB, opacity, vibrance, clarity, saturation, dodge, burn, lighten shadows, darken shadows, brighten, darken, tint, spot healing, eraser, inserting texts, using filters, denoising, cropping, need I go on? When do you stop? You stop when the scene looks good to you.
Some times I tone the sky down when the sky is distracting from the subject of my pic. I recognize that huge cottonball clouds with polarized deep blue skys are not always the norm. It looks like we are on the same page for this subject.
Smile,
JimmyT sends