Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Is taking a picture of a single tree a requirement of being a photographer
Page <<first <prev 13 of 17 next> last>>
Jun 8, 2020 06:59:53   #
TonyL Loc: Coventry, UK
 
Perhaps you need to be more mindful. Is it the whole tree in the landscape or are you looking for the small things such as texture, foliage etc? At one time I would look at a location and think there was nothing to take, then I learned to look for the smaller things, perhaps the eye-catching or just plain quirky - whatever. It takes application and thought but it's worth trying!

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 08:29:28   #
coachejp
 
Great job!!!

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 08:31:26   #
coachejp
 
Me also,GREAT PICTURE

Reply
 
 
Jun 8, 2020 08:55:18   #
nj53 Loc: Canon City, Colorado
 
here's a dominant tree, with a few of his pals, getting ready for Christmas!


(Download)

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 09:08:50   #
Blair Shaw Jr Loc: Dunnellon,Florida
 
nj53 wrote:
here's a dominant tree, with a few of his pals, getting ready for Christmas!



Reply
Jun 8, 2020 09:23:07   #
xt2 Loc: British Columbia, Canada
 
grandpaw wrote:
I follow and watch a lot of photography videos and I am wondering a what point does taking a photo of an individual tree become a requirement. A lot of photographers seem to do this. It really hasn't appealed to me, is there something I am missing? They seem to go on and on about the composition and how beautiful the scene of the single tree is. I don't get it! What am I missing???


Nothing... but a tree...

Cheers!

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 14:27:00   #
Smithyb
 
yes!

Reply
 
 
Jun 8, 2020 14:30:22   #
Smithyb
 
Yes, I followed the gnome, but had not heard that it was destroyed and the perpetrators jailed.

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 14:31:31   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
grandpaw wrote:
I follow and watch a lot of photography videos and I am wondering a what point does taking a photo of an individual tree become a requirement. A lot of photographers seem to do this. It really hasn't appealed to me, is there something I am missing? They seem to go on and on about the composition and how beautiful the scene of the single tree is. I don't get it! What am I missing???

At least a single tree has changed since the last photograph of it was taken - unlike the moon, which looks basically the same in ever photograph and has been photographed better by NASA than any individual will do here on earth.

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 14:42:09   #
Smithyb
 
In 2014-15 I drove from San Francisco to New York City and back taking photos of trees along the way. After, I had a show of about 30 of the trees along with their stories. One had assisted in a hanging, two were famous oaks (Austin, TX and Auburn, AL) that had been poisoned—both perpetrators went to jail. There are other stories these trees tell.

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 14:55:40   #
FotoHog Loc: on Cloud 9
 
grandpaw wrote:
I follow and watch a lot of photography videos and I am wondering a what point does taking a photo of an individual tree become a requirement. A lot of photographers seem to do this. It really hasn't appealed to me, is there something I am missing? They seem to go on and on about the composition and how beautiful the scene of the single tree is. I don't get it! What am I missing???


Trees have been fascinating photographic subjects for a long time. They can appear to exhibit personality and character like people and therefore have often been used as symbols of longevity, endurance, and stalwartness. Some look stately and elegant, while others can have an outright spooky appearance. People sometimes change the natural appearance of trees by stunting or otherwise training their branches as in bonsai trees or decorative garden trees. I believe that trees can be beautiful subjects for the camera.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
 
 
Jun 8, 2020 14:56:32   #
Photographer Jim Loc: Rio Vista, CA
 
peter pat wrote:
Photographer Jim, that is a great photo. What type of tree was it? Where is that?


Remnant of bristlecone pine. Taken at 11,000 ft In the Ancient Bristlecone Pine Forest in the White Mountains east of Bishop, CA.

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 15:08:22   #
Jmcurrysr Loc: Georgia
 
grandpaw wrote:
I follow and watch a lot of photography videos and I am wondering a what point does taking a photo of an individual tree become a requirement. A lot of photographers seem to do this. It really hasn't appealed to me, is there something I am missing? They seem to go on and on about the composition and how beautiful the scene of the single tree is. I don't get it! What am I missing???


It depends. One of the most beautiful images is a tree that is perfectly shaped by nature ( or as I believe, by the Creator). There is a particular tree in a local cow pasture near my home that even my wife "wows" about it. I've been wanting to shoot this tree for years... but have not been able. It's about 300 yards off the road. My only problem is that the bull can run faster than I can. So I continue to admire this tree from the highway.

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 15:32:23   #
Smithyb
 
One of my favorite tree photo places!!

Reply
Jun 8, 2020 16:54:47   #
Jim Brown Loc: Skagit County, WA
 
I have heard it said that a good photo should tell a story. This photo of germinating Ponderosa Pine tells a story of potential. These trees can live for hundreds of years, provide wildlife habitat, shade, sequester tons of atmospheric carbon and produce countless progeny using locally sourced water and nutrients, all with solar power. That story is worthy of unending photo ops.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 13 of 17 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.