dsmeltz wrote:
That is the other part of the two bodies question. A second identical body or do you want one crop and one full frame? There are pros and cons to both.
A second identical body would be the easiest but I think most people don’t purchase two identical cameras at the same time or at a later date. The first shooter is usually an upgrade of the second shooter. IMO
kb6kgx wrote:
Here's what I'm using: Nikon D7100 with a Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED IF AF-S VRII and a Sigma 17-50mm f2.8. Yes, I know that the Nikon is a "FX" lens and the Sigma is a "DX" lens.
I am a photographer for my local county fire department. For helicopters and aerial tankers, nothing beats the 70-300. It gets the job done. For most everything else, the Sigma is great when I need to "go wide". Now, here's my question:
I'm tired of missing shots because of having to change lenses. I also don't want to have to change lenses when there is a lot of dust and burning things flying around in the air around me. Do I just add a second camera body and put a lens on each or do I keep both lenses in the bag and put on something like a Tamron 18-400? For this type of photography, I've never found that I need the extra 100mm that the Tamron would give, which makes my question a simple one of (1) second body or (2) super-zoom?
Here's what I'm using: Nikon D7100 with a Nikon 70... (
show quote)
When you say you'r tired of missing shots then that intrinsically answers your question. Using two bodies allows for a longer life span of each body as well as the life span of the batteries. Another plus to consider as you mentioned also is less exposure to the elements from having to swap out lenses.
If a second body is purchased, although it need not be the same model it would be useful for it to be one that can use the same lenses. That way it can serve a second function as a true backup should something happen to the original camera.
Hi kb6kgx - Nothing; you've got it all. With the FE2 as BU you've no need of a second body unless you have problems with the prime body, your D7100.
I suspect you have more than enough Focal length. The only other advantage would be a VR ii lens. If that be the case then picking up a S/H D810 & trade in your FE2, might be a sound choice unless you have a need for transparencies?
In your case, gear is not urgent, just go get those photos.
Best wishes.
Ron T.S
rehess
Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
I had a Sigma 18-270mm at one time, but ‘retired’ it and went back to my two lens solution. Once you get up to 10X lenses, the designer is forced into too many compromises, and the result is not good for you.
Depends on what your budget is. When out in field I carried 3 cameras. Normal lens, midrange, and telephoto. Also had wide angle in bag with 2 motor drives. If I had to switch a lens ; the wide angle would go on camera with normal lens. Much simpler and faster to change. You always risk dirt and damage to a lens when changing. I also carried a little point and shoot in my pocket for unexpected shots. My experience photojournalist / combat photographer.
rehess
Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
Comphoto wrote:
Depends on what your budget is. When out in field I carried 3 cameras. Normal lens, midrange, and telephoto. Also had wide angle in bag with 2 motor drives. If I had to switch a lens ; the wide angle would go on camera with normal lens. Much simpler and faster to change. You always risk dirt and damage to a lens when changing. I also carried a little point and shoot in my pocket for unexpected shots. My experience photojournalist / combat photographer.
I cannot imagine carrying that much weight - I am 72 now.
Then just use what you have. I'm 70 and can still carry a full bag
rehess
Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
Comphoto wrote:
Then just use what you have. I'm 70 and can still carry a full bag
My bag would not hold three bodies even if were more than ‘full’.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.