markngolf wrote:
Just finished reading it via my NYTimes subscription. Very worthwhile reading. I was going to post it, but you are "quicker on the draw".
Thanks for posting.
Mark
If it's in the New York Times it automatically has questionable facts. If I had bird, he would be reading it everytime he looked down.
Gasman57 wrote:
If it's in the New York Times it automatically has questionable facts. If I had bird, he would be reading it everytime he looked down.
OK, forget it was in the NYT. Just read it and consider the points made.
MrBumps2U wrote:
OK, forget it was in the NYT. Just read it and consider the points made.
Why do that? You might have to think.
rehess
Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
cmc4214 wrote:
Only the ones the press quotes, or tells you about
Do you have a quote from any expert in Public Health who does not believe the use of masks and 'public distancing" is a good response to this virus??
Gasman57 wrote:
If it's in the New York Times it automatically has questionable facts. If I had bird, he would be reading it everytime he looked down.
Difficult to respond to your comment. Is it a foreign language or just lacking grammar? It's a wonder you have actually read the NYTimes. I doubt it.
Mark
cmc4214 wrote:
Only the ones the press quotes, or tells you about
Here's a FACT they all AGREE on.... 10 weeks ago, one death. This morning, OVER 80,000 DEATHS.
Fotoartist wrote:
May be a good article but I'm not going to read the NY Toilet Paper Times.
Many years ago (65 or so) I seemed to be the only college student who subscribed to the NYTimes. It has become a Leftist Rag now and I deign to pollute my mind with their socialist/communist, indoctrinating drivel.
markngolf wrote:
Was that a response to me? Using "Quote Reply" is an easy way to respond to a specific poster. If it "might be a good article", why limit yourself to narrow minded choices?
Mark
Because he is...who he is.
Way to be open-minded. Why read something that isn’t what you want to hear.
RichardSM wrote:
Why are so fixated on this virus 🦠.
Because we don't want to die.
I read the entire article - seemed to have lots of good information in it. Thanks for sharing.
[quote=BigDen]When even the experts have differing opinions, I am not sure how you determine the difference between “real facts” and “alternate facts.” I guess it is like preferring “truth over facts.” Depends on what your “truth”
There are no such things as alternative facts, only the facts. Opinions are just that, opinions and may not have anything to do with facts.
Richard: i am on your side. My response was directed towards people who said they would never read that rag!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.