Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Post-Processing Digital Images
Extending sun rays, your help please
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Apr 5, 2020 22:51:23   #
twosummers Loc: Melbourne Australia or Lincolnshire England
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Thanks, but no more software for me - a New Year's Resolution


I'm impressed - or did you mean no more NEW software?

Reply
Apr 6, 2020 07:20:33   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
twosummers wrote:
I'm impressed - or did you mean no more NEW software?
HA, sorry, yes. No more purchases. I will continue to use what I have until it or my computer breaks. Then we'll re-assess

Reply
Apr 6, 2020 09:07:39   #
Guyserman Loc: Benton, AR
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
I realized that the way I'm used to - and currently prefer - is to change opacity and selectively mask, if needed. Just personal preference and familiarity.

I did a bit of hard brush on the edges of the bright areas, filled in between those "lines" with soft brush. Subtlety seemed key, as you suggested.

---

I decided to try Larry's suggestion for extending the shadows while also doing the brightening to the sunlit areas. Note that most layers have some masking, and I also adjusted opacity. People will see differently depending on their monitors and will probably also have different preferences re the amount of color and brightness. These adjustments are easily changed with layer opacity and/or the blend mode.

As a last step, one I realized was needed after posting, is to add Nik glamour glow to the sunlit section of foregroud. Then I brightened a little, but now it looks a skosh too bright

Time for a break! Thank you all for your time and interest.
I realized that the way I'm used to - and currentl... (show quote)


Linda, I've got to think about this shadow business. I know they will naturally appear farther apart near to you but shouldn't their vanishing point be the sun?

Reply
 
 
Apr 6, 2020 09:29:28   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Guyserman wrote:
Linda, I've got to think about this shadow business. I know they will naturally appear farther apart near to you but shouldn't their vanishing point be the sun?
I don't think I understand, Mr. G. Take a look at the "original" in the OP. Is there something there that doesn't look right? I didn't do anything to the shadows until this thread. Tell me more!

Reply
Apr 6, 2020 09:38:15   #
Guyserman Loc: Benton, AR
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
I don't think I understand, Mr. G. Take a look at the "original" in the OP. Is there something there that doesn't look right? I didn't do anything to the shadows until this thread. Tell me more!


If you extend the lines of the shadows on beyond the trees they should all converge at the sun. (I think.) (When I first saw this topic it was already past this point so I commented here but it applies to the original also.)

Reply
Apr 6, 2020 10:15:44   #
bleirer
 
The rays would vanish at the sun, but the shadows come from the angle of the sun to the obstruction as they cast onto the changing surface of the earth, notice the trees shadow. The hills also form a shadow as they block the sun so the shadows emanate from them. I agree darkening the shadows a little would accentuate the rays. In photoshop I might try levels for this and mask away the parts I didn't like. Even the burn tool could work though, and I think elements has that, and its easier.

Reply
Apr 6, 2020 10:43:01   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Guyserman wrote:
If you extend the lines of the shadows on beyond the trees they should all converge at the sun. (I think.) (When I first saw this topic it was already past this point so I commented here but it applies to the original also.)
I am sooo confused. Below is a crop of the "original" I included in OP (I don't have the original original).

- the tree shadows have not been manipulated in any way. They appear to cross the river and end at the foreground bushes, or below that - out of sight.

- in my newest edit click here, I darkened the tree shadows in the river and extended them into the foreground bushes. I tried to continue a line that was "straight" based on the angle of each shadow.

- I also brightened areas of the foreground as if the sunshine was reaching that far. Is that what you're referring to? In reality I believe there are sun flares in the bushes that I cloned over. You can still see two in the water near where it turns the corner, as well as one (greenish) in the bushes where brightest, near left side. I don't know why the foreground isn't brighter, other than maybe something to do with my original exposure or the sun rays just don't reach that far because of the sun's low angle.

Please stay with me and help me understand!



Reply
 
 
Apr 6, 2020 10:51:10   #
maryo Loc: Santa fe
 
i like it just the way you fixed it here.

Reply
Apr 6, 2020 10:53:28   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
maryo wrote:
i like it just the way you fixed it here.
Thanks Mary. I don't know which "here" you mean as there are additional edits. If you use the quote reply button under a specific posting, that will clarify which and where. I know it looks like just the "reply" button should attach itself to a specific posting, but it doesn't

Reply
Apr 6, 2020 11:11:59   #
L-Fox
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
I don't think I understand, Mr. G. Take a look at the "original" in the OP. Is there something there that doesn't look right? I didn't do anything to the shadows until this thread. Tell me more!


The shadows have a vanishing point BEHIND the trees. The shadow is born at the base of the each tree. Note the vertical line; the sun is parked directly over that same vanishing point.

The shadow are lying on the flat earth, not angling up toward the sun.



Reply
Apr 6, 2020 11:14:29   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
l-fox wrote:
The shadows have a vanishing point BEHIND the trees. The shadow is born at the base of the each tree. Note the vertical line; the sun is parked directly over that same vanishing point.
OK. How does that relate to the edits I did, which are only to the foreground?

Reply
 
 
Apr 6, 2020 11:21:48   #
L-Fox
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
OK. How does that relate to the edits I did, which are only to the foreground?


Guyserman brought up the subject and you use the word "confused". I'm just trying to indicate why the shadows don't behave as he expected and hopefully get my friend "unconfused".

Reply
Apr 6, 2020 11:25:11   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
l-fox wrote:
Guyserman brought up the subject and you use the word "confused". I'm just trying to indicate why the shadows don't behave as he expected and hopefully get my friend "unconfused".
I might be way beyond help, but thank you for trying, Larry!

Reply
Apr 6, 2020 12:01:22   #
lloydl2 Loc: Gilbert, AZ
 
Here's a way in PS there are likely others search youtube and or google

https://www.photoshopessentials.com/photo-effects/add-rays-of-sunlight-to-a-photo-with-photoshop/

Reply
Apr 6, 2020 12:02:59   #
Guyserman Loc: Benton, AR
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
I might be way beyond help, but thank you for trying, Larry!


You don't need help. I'm the one that needed help. I see now that the shot was taken from a high elevation which caused the shadows to appear the way they did. Thanks, I-fox.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Post-Processing Digital Images
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.