Frank T wrote:
You're just jealous of him because hes a real hero.and doesnt need to impersonate one.
You may laugh at me, but I pity you.
You're such a sad case.
Leme guess. You almost served:
LWW wrote:
Agreed, but it is towards 'commissioned officers' and not civilian military leadership.
The President is the Commander in Chief of the military.
Wrangler wrote:
The President is the Commander in Chief of the military.
... and a braggart draft dodger. It's a funny old world eh?
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
Wrangler wrote:
The President is the Commander in Chief of the military.
True, but they split civilian from military in the two sections.
Eventually they say the same thing.
LWW wrote:
True, but they split civilian from military in the two sections.
Eventually they say the same thing.
"I'm like the supreme commander in chief Libtards! Want me to point out Ukraine on a map? Well do ya?!!"
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
I didn’t say he couldnt, or I couldn’t.
I said you couldn’t.
Texcaster wrote:
So? You'll say anything.
Stop smelling your fingers
Angmo wrote:
Stop smelling your fingers
That's what mama used to say?
Frank T wrote:
What a bunch of snowflakes you guys are.
You cant punish someone for telling the truth.
No punishment for telling the truth. Punishment for not telling it in the proper manner.
[quote=Texcaster]Buy a small globe for the locker room Lou. You know it makes sense.
"Trump couldn't find Ukraine if the map had a 'U' and a picture of a crane" - Smart ass TV people.
He sure found a small nerve to piss you left-brain off big time,
Calm down little honey, worse days are coming and then you can continue to grunt.
Wrangler wrote:
Is Lt. Col. Vindman guilty of a violation of Article 89 of the UCMJ?
"A top Pentagon official as recently as last month vowed the department would not tolerate "any act of retaliation" against Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman -- a pledge now being put to the test after Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn this week repeatedly attacked the key National Security Council aide who testified before Congress on the Ukraine scandal.
Responding to concerns about Vindman's safety following his November testimony in the House impeachment inquiry, Deputy Defense Secretary David Norquist -- on Defense Secretary Mark Esper's behalf -- assured Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer that the department would take any "steps necessary" to ensure the White House detailee's safety, according to a copy of a December 16 letter to Schumer that was obtained by CNN.
"Let me assure you, the Department will not tolerate any act of retaliation or reprisal," Norquist wrote to Schumer, noting that he was speaking on behalf of his boss, Esper.
"Further, we are committed to taking whatever steps are necessary, consistent with Section 714 of Title 10, US code, to ensure the security of LTC Vindman," he added. Norquist also promised to provide the same protections for Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Laura Cooper, another impeachment witness who provided key testimony in the House probe.
The portion of US code cited by Norquist primarily relates to the Defense Secretary's authority over matters involving individuals within the chain of command. Still, the spirit of that letter has taken on new relevance after Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican"
Wrangler wrote:
Is Lt. Col. Vindman guilty of a violation of Article 89 of the UCMJ?
For what?
Perhaps an article 15 which is common for doing stupid stuff.
Have him on KP duty for a week.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.