What lens? (Page 3): The quality of the lens and resolution of the sensor, IMHO, are key. A quality 300 or 400mm lens, on a crop sensor camera, taken on a clear night will result in a...

ggab Loc: ?

gvarner wrote:

You’ll want to be around 600 mm full frame equivalent to get a good moon image with lots of detail.

The quality of the lens and resolution of the sensor, IMHO, are key.
A quality 300 or 400mm lens, on a crop sensor camera, taken on a clear night will result in a cropped image with lot's of detail.

bleirer

ggab wrote:

KEH has the 100-400 IS L USM for $597.00.
The forum will vouch for KEH as a used gear vendor.

That is the version i though. The version ii is more like $1400. Reviewers think there is a big difference, with the ii being far superior, but the price is right.

ggab Loc: ?

bleirer wrote:

That is the version i though. The version ii is more like $1400. Reviewers think there is a big difference, with the ii being far superior, but the price is right.

I was looking for budget friendly options since we don't, or at least I don't, know the budget.
L Glass is L Glass. L is always good.

Frankly, I would get the 400mm f/5.6L prime. I have one and it's a very good lens.

bleirer

ggab wrote:

I was looking for budget friendly options since we don't, or at least I don't, know the budget.
L Glass is L Glass. L is always good.

Frankly, I would get the 400mm f/5.6L prime. I have one and it's a very good lens.

I agree on the 400, I rented one recently and liked it a lot, and the price is right.

I agree on the budget friendly for version i vs ii, just pointing out to the OP that the names can confuse, but they are different lenses, the i being the 'dust pump' type zoom, as they call it.

ggab Loc: ?

bleirer wrote:

I agree on the 400, I rented one recently and liked it a lot, and the price is right.

I agree on the budget friendly for version i vs ii, just pointing out to the OP that the names can confuse, but they are different lenses, the i being the 'dust pump' type zoom, as they call it.

Cookie223 Loc: New Jersey

Consider used. There are a few reputable dealers who have some decent items at reduced prices.
I purchased a Tamron 150-600 G2 used from Roberts Camera in Indianapolis, looked new, and they gave me a warranty. Even though it’s a big lens, I’m very happy with it.
I suggest to go to a camera store and touch, see, and feel before you make your decision.
Good luck.
PS. The G2 cost me $800

Cookie223 Loc: New Jersey

Repeated post (removed)

ggab Loc: ?

Cookie223 wrote:

Consider used. There are a few reputable dealers who have some decent items at reduced prices.
I purchased a Tamron 150-600 G2 used from Roberts Camera in Indianapolis, looked new, and they gave me a warranty. Even though it’s a big lens, I’m very happy with it.
I suggest to go to a camera store and touch, see, and feel before you make your decision.
Good luck.
PS. The G2 cost me $800

I don't currently see any used, except perhaps for Ebay.

Buck1949 Loc: Phoenix

Mystc3 wrote:

I have a new Canon T7i Rebel, and have my macro lens, now I need one that will get me up close and personal with the man in the moon, but, I don’t really want to sell the farm in order to buy one....lol I’m aware there are other name brands that I can use on my camera that would be less expensive. Maybe even used off eBay. Thoughts? (Yep I’m a beginner)

I have the Tamron 150/600 mm. G2 -newest model that I purchased refurbished from WB Hunt a year ago. It still has 2 years on the ‘almost’ all inclusive warranty from Mack in New Jersey which is fully transferable. I have decided that this lens is not the one I want to travel with on River Cruises etc. and for travel to Alaska, and the Panama Canal etc. as it is a bit bigger/heavier than this 70 year old wants to deal with. I just a few days ago posted it for sale on a local FB Marketplace and a local Phoenix, Arizona Nextdoor neighborhood web site. (I really Do Not want to ship it). There is absolutely nothing wrong with the lens, no scratches and great clear glass etc. I would consider selling it to a UHH member, even though I have hesitated due to shipping concerns. I paid nearly $900 for it and have it listed now for $650 plus any shipping if i sell it other than local. It comes with all the original things; box, manual, lens caps and hood, and protective bag. Also I have 3 Vivitar filters. Let me know if you or anyone has an interest. I am still not listing it for sale here just yet (other than this offer), hoping for a local buyer if possible.

Take care, and enjoy whatever you decide on. Wildlife and landscape photography is still what I enjoy the most.

imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida

Mystc3 wrote:

I have a new Canon T7i Rebel, and have my macro lens, now I need one that will get me up close and personal with the man in the moon, but, I don’t really want to sell the farm in order to buy one....lol I’m aware there are other name brands that I can use on my camera that would be less expensive. Maybe even used off eBay. Thoughts? (Yep I’m a beginner)

Canon 70-300 IS II nano or, Tamron 100-400.....if you are serious about good long range imaging, I would by-pass the 18-400 Tammy.
.

rlscholl Loc: California

If by Man-in-the-Moon, you mean photographing the moon, then your best bet may be a single purpose lens just for that purpose. In that case, a telescope (with an adapter for the camera), or the longest prime you can afford could best meet your needs. Remember that the moon is bright, so you won’t need a fast lens. One type of lens for that type of use would be a long reflector (i.e., mirror) lens. Lenses of this type were more popular in the past than they are today, so your best bet for something like that might be a used 500mm or longer mirror lens.

Mystc3 Loc: Santa Rosa,CA

If I have to spend more to get better I will. my husband is looking at the Sigma 50-600 mm. So I guess my question is plain, Which lens will give me nice sharp in camera shoots of the moon? As long as the will work with my T7i.

wilsondl2 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska

When I was young and we had 6 children and not a lot of money for photography. I bought a Spiratone 400 f/6.3 lens. It was fun but to hard to focus on anything moving. But it did do well with the moon. another is the 500mm mirror lenses. Both are t mount lenses so you can use them on almost any SLR/DSLR camera. See both on eBay all the time for less than $50. Use tripod - focus carefully - remember you are shooting in full Sun so expose like you are. - Picture taken with the cheap Spiratone 400 - Dave

Buck1949 Loc: Phoenix

Mystc3 wrote:

If I have to spend more to get better I will. my husband is looking at the Sigma 50-600 mm. So I guess my question is plain, Which lens will give me nice sharp in camera shoots of the moon? As long as the will work with my T7i.

I actually have a couple of hand held shots I did of the blood moon with the 150-600mm lens... I was satisfied with the results.

CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City

Mystc3 wrote:

If I have to spend more to get better I will. my husband is looking at the Sigma 50-600 mm. So I guess my question is plain, Which lens will give me nice sharp in camera shoots of the moon? As long as the will work with my T7i.

For the $1700 new cost of this lens (Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sports), your money would be better spent on an earlier suggestion above of the Canon EF 100-400L IS II and the EF 1.4x III. Your Canon T7i can autofocus this f/8 and 560mm combination and the Canon lens is smaller (still large) and lighter than the Sigma option, assuming you meant this specific Sigma lens.

Rather than a model, indicating the budget range for compatible with the EOS T7i might be a better way to identify new / used candidates for that budget. A quality tripod might be considered within the budget for the effective use of these longer / heavier ideas.