Always in ACR. Provides a starting point.
I do much of the time, especially if the exposure is too dark. I very seldom just leave the adjustments as the "Auto" function sets them, though. (And sometimes I think the photo is fine just as it is, with maybe a little tweaking.)
And, if you really don't like what Auto did, there is always the "Reset" button--it puts the photo back in the "as shot" condition. (Unfortunately, it also undoes any cropping or perspective/tilt adjustments, so it's better to do the exposure changes first.)
Yes. But I usually make some changes or hit Reset and start over after I see what auto did.
brian43053 wrote:
Just a quick poll to see if any LR users hit the "auto" button in the develop mode as a starting point when editing. I started doing that and kinda like it.
Yup ... most often as a starter 'preset'. I keep my fingers on 'Command - Z' just in case it ain't better.
It never hurts to see what the settings would be when using any "automatic" adjustment. Presets make changes. I use all of these to see what changes are made. If I like them, I keep them. If I don't then undo, or reset, brings it back to the beginning. I also use the settings on all photos taken under the same type of exposure. It saves a bit of time. I learn a lot every time I use an automated action. Helps when understanding what the settings can do.
Usually auto is what I try when I've already tried tweaking with contrast, dehaze, and texture.
rdw845
Loc: San Francisco Area
I use it particularly to see brightness and contrast just before I print.
I use a preset that I made for importing so already have a starting point saves a lot of time
I searched a little yesterday on how to make a custom preset for importing and did not find what I was wanting. Anyone know a website with a good tutorial on building your own custom import preset? Thanks.
I use the in-camera's jpeg settings as a starting point (and often end point)--after all, these DSLR's were designed to produce a quality image. I also like the auto develop as a starting point-but usually further adjust afterwards and have found I usually end up close to the in-camera result. There are a million ways to go about developing RAW images and in a effort to avoid spending all day behind the computer... I'd rather be shooting than developing is where my thoughts are.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.