Bridge Cameras Image Quality??
Nov 12, 2019 07:14:57 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
frjeff wrote:
Just a hypothetical: if you were to buy a bridge camera solely based on stills image quality (not concerned with video), which would you choose?
Bridge camera's are too large for me personally. I like pocket camera's for travel. My choice is the Sony HX99, pop up viewfinder, Zeiss 24-750 mm lens, and I can print easily to a 20X30 print. And best of all, I do not have to FINE TUNE the lens.
Nov 12, 2019 07:18:53 #
ggab
Loc: ?
frjeff wrote:
Just a hypothetical: if you were to buy a bridge camera solely based on stills image quality (not concerned with video), which would you choose?
I did. I just bought a used Panasonic FZ1000 mk i.
Based on my research, it is the best value for stills.
Multiple batteries, hip case, nd filter set etc. $390.00
Your mileage may vary.
Nov 12, 2019 07:36:18 #
Tomcat5133
Loc: Gladwyne PA
As others have said here the Sony Sony RX10 III (the first 600mm) in this series is a serious
camera. Very good at zoomed to 600mm. Pictures seems to have a crispness to them.
I have used this camera for all sorts of situation. Will like the latest version but the III is good.
The video (i do a lot of video) is outstanding. The other day I was looking for some images
and I kept pulling out images I thought were good and they were made with the III.
It is a do it all camera. Sony never fails to astound me. I started with the RX100 series
and now am up to the mark 4.
I have their mirrorless cameras. a6000 series 2 and the a7s II which is still a great
full frame camera. But this bridge could be all you need.
camera. Very good at zoomed to 600mm. Pictures seems to have a crispness to them.
I have used this camera for all sorts of situation. Will like the latest version but the III is good.
The video (i do a lot of video) is outstanding. The other day I was looking for some images
and I kept pulling out images I thought were good and they were made with the III.
It is a do it all camera. Sony never fails to astound me. I started with the RX100 series
and now am up to the mark 4.
I have their mirrorless cameras. a6000 series 2 and the a7s II which is still a great
full frame camera. But this bridge could be all you need.
Nov 12, 2019 07:48:46 #
ggab
Loc: ?
frjeff wrote:
Just a hypothetical: if you were to buy a bridge camera solely based on stills image quality (not concerned with video), which would you choose?
As you see, asking an open ended question without qualifiers brings you a ton of non related responses.
So for that reason, I'm out.
Nov 12, 2019 08:21:59 #
so you're telling him to buy an almost 14 year old camera????
Longshadow wrote:
Back in 2006 I purchased a Sony H-1, still have it.
Love the fact that it focuses down to 2cm. 36-432mm equivalent (12x optical)
The pixel count is only 5.1Mp (Good for the time of release though.).
Nice little camera before my Canon T1i.
Love the fact that it focuses down to 2cm. 36-432mm equivalent (12x optical)
The pixel count is only 5.1Mp (Good for the time of release though.).
Nice little camera before my Canon T1i.
Nov 12, 2019 08:25:26 #
I would spend a lot of time reading these articles.
https://www.techradar.com/news/best-bridge-camera
https://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/best-bridge-cameras/
https://www.pcmag.com/roundup/348745/the-best-bridge-cameras
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/best-bridge-cameras,review-2212.html (You will have to copy and paste this URL. The comma near the end confuses it.)
https://www.techradar.com/news/best-bridge-camera
https://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/best-bridge-cameras/
https://www.pcmag.com/roundup/348745/the-best-bridge-cameras
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/best-bridge-cameras,review-2212.html (You will have to copy and paste this URL. The comma near the end confuses it.)
Nov 12, 2019 08:27:13 #
frjeff wrote:
Just a hypothetical: if you were to buy a bridge camera solely based on stills image quality (not concerned with video), which would you choose?
The Sony RX10 IV......best all-around performer I believe . And I HATE Sony menus Totally but love the results and the flexibility of that Zeis lens (25X)
It will cover nearly all of your needs without question but I would try one out first before I committed the $$$ ........yep.
Nov 12, 2019 08:33:30 #
I just spent hours watching Sony RX10iv on YT, every review I could find. Also talked to B & H. Made the decision to sell my almost-new Nikon P1000—losing money :(—and buy a used Sony bridge. I loved the zoom on the Nikon, especially for moon shots, but, of course, it looks the same each month, so I decided there are other features I would rather have. I pray this is the last camera that calls to me. This hobby can bankrupt one!
Nov 12, 2019 08:54:53 #
frjeff wrote:
Just a hypothetical: if you were to buy a bridge camera solely based on stills image quality (not concerned with video), which would you choose?
It's about 10 years old but I would buy the Fuji S200EXR. Lens range about 30-435mm, almost a 1" sensor, built like a tank, and color and clarity were amazingly outstanding!
Nov 12, 2019 10:38:50 #
Go with the Sony RX10 IV. Yes, bit heavy (it’s mainly lens) but don’t have to worry about changing lens, missing a shot and luging stuff all over. Yes Sony menu is a bit much, but images are excellent and for any amateur or semi-pro use equal to “full frame”. Took this picture yesterday with solar filter of transit of Mercury. Hand held, yes was lazy, f 4.5 @1/250 iso auto @700. Zoom in and small fuzzy dot (hey hand held) is Mercury. Quite a camera
Nov 12, 2019 10:55:52 #
James56 wrote:
Sony RX10 M3 & M4, I've owned them both. I lov... (show quote)
That’s a great image, and also talks to how good those cameras are that you mentioned!
Nov 12, 2019 11:06:21 #
tomad
Loc: North Carolina
frjeff wrote:
Just a hypothetical: if you were to buy a bridge camera solely based on stills image quality (not concerned with video), which would you choose?
No doubt about it... if you want the best and have the money to spend the Sony RX10 IV comes in at the top of the list. There are other good ones (Panasonic Lumix) but if you want the best this is it.
Nov 12, 2019 14:25:53 #
Several years ago I bought a Nikon P530. It's been a great bridge camera that has never failed me.
Today I might choose a Nikon P1000.
Today I might choose a Nikon P1000.
Nov 12, 2019 14:28:57 #
rhadams824
Loc: Arkansas
tomad wrote:
No doubt about it... if you want the best and have the money to spend the Sony RX10 IV comes in at the top of the list. There are other good ones (Panasonic Lumix) but if you want the best this is it.
I have the Sony RX10 III and have used the clear image zoom that goes to 1200mm and can capture photos that you probable would not get otherwise. I love this camera because of the one lens and it does good close-up photos. Waiting on the RX10 V to see what advances are made.
Nov 12, 2019 14:29:25 #
I would also add my two cents to the Sony RX-10 Mod3 or Mod 4. Both models are an excellent bridge camera, and shoot in both Sony RAW and hi res JPEG, but they are relatively HEAVY, compared the smaller RX-100. The zoom lens is incredible- no need to carry around additional lenses. Also don' t forget to get a decent padded/hammock style carrying bag-like the ones from CaseLogic. They are well worth it. I accidentally dropped my RX-10 III, and it took $400 to repair it. But never again.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.