Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
D500
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Oct 30, 2019 13:34:42   #
kibbles304 Loc: Indiana
 
uhaas2009 wrote:
I don’t know what it is with the battery but my 810 in the beginning was terrible but know I shoot a lot. I believe the 7100 have the same battery. Congratulations to your 500


👍🏻

Reply
Oct 30, 2019 13:39:03   #
kibbles304 Loc: Indiana
 
hammond wrote:
You can also change the White Balance with the button marked "WB" in the top left dial - then use the front-right command dial to adjust the white balance. No need to press "OK" once set.


Thanks Hammond. I actually went into the WB menu and selected fluorescence level 4 and forgot to hit the OK button which isn’t needed on my D7100

Reply
Oct 30, 2019 13:51:34   #
amfoto1 Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
 
kibbles304 wrote:
I have been using Nikon D7100 and love the camera. I have grandkids that play indoor sports. The D7100 struggles a bit with indoor gym lighting and using higher ISO settings. Well, I just got the Nikon D500 and used it for a Butler University volleyball game last Sunday! Whoa, what a difference. I am just learning this camera so I am hoping to improve photo quality even more. Example, I thought I adjusted the WB for the florescent lighting....forgot to hit the designated ok button and didn't change the WB! I was using the Auto WB setting and the darn camera was pretty much nailing it. I am so happy with this camera. If you are on the fence, I hope you can take the leap. I don't think you will be disappointed. Many pros about this camera...that being said...I have so far one con...I am not liking the battery life for sure. Anyway, just my humble opinion about the Nikon D500...
I have been using Nikon D7100 and love the camera.... (show quote)


The D500 also has "Flicker Reduction", which can be helpful for more accurate exposures under some types of indoor lighting, such as is often used in gyms.

It's been a problem for sports photographers forever. The shutter speeds we need to use to stop action don't work well with fluorescent, sodium vapor and some other types of lighting that cycle on and off very rapidly (60 hz in the U.S., 50 hz in Europe). If the shutter opening and closing in a fraction of a second happened to coincide with the lights' peak output.... all was good. But if it coincided with their "off" state, things got ugly!

Flicker Reduction, when it's enabled, detects the rapid cycling of the lights and times the shutter release to coincide with the peak output. Without this feature, shooting under those lights it wasn't uncommon to see half or more of your images underexposed.... some images were underexposed to the point they were totally unusable. The only "solutions" before this feature were to use a slower shutter speed, which didn't work for sports photography, or just take lots and lots of extra shots to be sure at least some of them are usable.

I've seen a huge difference using the similar feature on more recent Canon (all current models except for the most entry level T7, I think)..... It's only very rarely that I now see an underexposed image due to the lighting. I was worried that timing the shutter release would cause delays... but it's usually not noticeable Only very rarely do I notice that there seems to be a slight delay or that frame rates slow a little during continuous shooting.

Give it a try. I know the D500 has it. I think the D850 is the only other current Nikon DSLR which has the Flicker Reduction feature. I don't know if Canon or Nikon mirrorless have it, or if some do, which models.

Maybe the lights in the particular gym you're shooting weren't a problem. Just be aware of that feature, which you might find very helpful!

Reply
 
 
Oct 30, 2019 14:07:48   #
kibbles304 Loc: Indiana
 
amfoto1 wrote:
The D500 also has "Flicker Reduction", which can be helpful for more accurate exposures under some types of indoor lighting, such as is often used in gyms.

It's been a problem for sports photographers forever. The shutter speeds we need to use to stop action don't work well with fluorescent, sodium vapor and some other types of lighting that cycle on and off very rapidly (60 hz in the U.S., 50 hz in Europe). If the shutter opening and closing in a fraction of a second happened to coincide with the lights' peak output.... all was good. But if it coincided with their "off" state, things got ugly!

Flicker Reduction, when it's enabled, detects the rapid cycling of the lights and times the shutter release to coincide with the peak output. Without this feature, shooting under those lights it wasn't uncommon to see half or more of your images underexposed.... some images were underexposed to the point they were totally unusable. The only "solutions" before this feature were to use a slower shutter speed, which didn't work for sports photography, or just take lots and lots of extra shots to be sure at least some of them are usable.

I've seen a huge difference using the similar feature on more recent Canon (all current models except for the most entry level T7, I think)..... It's only very rarely that I now see an underexposed image due to the lighting. I was worried that timing the shutter release would cause delays... but it's usually not noticeable Only very rarely do I notice that there seems to be a slight delay or that frame rates slow a little during continuous shooting.

Give it a try. I know the D500 has it. I think the D850 is the only other current Nikon DSLR which has the Flicker Reduction feature. I don't know if Canon or Nikon mirrorless have it, or if some do, which models.

Maybe the lights in the particular gym you're shooting weren't a problem. Just be aware of that feature, which you might find very helpful!
The D500 also has "Flicker Reduction", w... (show quote)


Thanks Allen. I will check that out for sure. My grandkids are into indoor soccer, basketball, volleyball and theater. Lots of different lighting.

Reply
Oct 30, 2019 17:43:17   #
Tommy II Loc: Northern Illinois
 
kibbles304 wrote:
I have been using Nikon D7100 and love the camera. I have grandkids that play indoor sports. The D7100 struggles a bit with indoor gym lighting and using higher ISO settings. Well, I just got the Nikon D500 and used it for a Butler University volleyball game last Sunday! Whoa, what a difference. I am just learning this camera so I am hoping to improve photo quality even more. Example, I thought I adjusted the WB for the florescent lighting....forgot to hit the designated ok button and didn't change the WB! I was using the Auto WB setting and the darn camera was pretty much nailing it. I am so happy with this camera. If you are on the fence, I hope you can take the leap. I don't think you will be disappointed. Many pros about this camera...that being said...I have so far one con...I am not liking the battery life for sure. Anyway, just my humble opinion about the Nikon D500...
I have been using Nikon D7100 and love the camera.... (show quote)


I know how you feel. I’ve had mine for about 18 months, and love it.

Reply
Oct 30, 2019 17:49:57   #
kibbles304 Loc: Indiana
 
Tommy II wrote:
I know how you feel. I’ve had mine for about 18 months, and love it.


How is the battery life on your D500 Tommy?

Reply
Oct 30, 2019 18:03:46   #
RickTaylor
 
wetreed wrote:
The D500 is very similar to the D5 only it’s a crop sensor camera and the D5 is full frame.


I agree the D 500 is fine camera. To say that is similar to the D5 is somewhat of an overstatement. Yes they will both take a picture. However if you shoot a lot of action photography the D5 blows it away. I know from experience as I have both of these bodies. If you ever have the opportunity to shoot the D5 you will understand what I am saying. Specifically in low light the fast focus and noise is significantly better than the D500

Reply
 
 
Oct 30, 2019 19:26:14   #
Kristian Loc: Monrovia, CA
 
I went through an ebook (Great Courses) by a Nat Geo photographer named Joel Sartore. He recommends leaving the WB set for daylight at all times. I've been doing this, and adjusting it in LR/PS when I need to. Good results. I don't know about other softwares.

That's pretty interesting about flourescent lights cycling on and off. I think I got bit by that once, now that I know what it is. Power lifting meet, pics were all over the place. Fortunately I don't shoot in that environment very often. My D-810 doesn't have that feature.

Reply
Oct 30, 2019 20:29:23   #
kibbles304 Loc: Indiana
 
Kristian wrote:
I went through an ebook (Great Courses) by a Nat Geo photographer named Joel Sartore. He recommends leaving the WB set for daylight at all times. I've been doing this, and adjusting it in LR/PS when I need to. Good results. I don't know about other softwares.

That's pretty interesting about flourescent lights cycling on and off. I think I got bit by that once, now that I know what it is. Power lifting meet, pics were all over the place. Fortunately I don't shoot in that environment very often. My D-810 doesn't have that feature.
I went through an ebook (Great Courses) by a Nat G... (show quote)


Oh, it’s a real issue shooting in old gyms. Most cameras do not have that feature. Look forward to not having that to worry about. Thanks for your post Kristian.

Reply
Oct 31, 2019 00:11:20   #
Bill Waxman Loc: Friday Harbor, San Juan Island, Washington
 
kibbles304 wrote:
I have been using Nikon D7100 and love the camera. I have grandkids that play indoor sports. The D7100 struggles a bit with indoor gym lighting and using higher ISO settings. Well, I just got the Nikon D500 and used it for a Butler University volleyball game last Sunday! Whoa, what a difference. I am just learning this camera so I am hoping to improve photo quality even more. Example, I thought I adjusted the WB for the florescent lighting....forgot to hit the designated ok button and didn't change the WB! I was using the Auto WB setting and the darn camera was pretty much nailing it. I am so happy with this camera. If you are on the fence, I hope you can take the leap. I don't think you will be disappointed. Many pros about this camera...that being said...I have so far one con...I am not liking the battery life for sure. Anyway, just my humble opinion about the Nikon D500...
I have been using Nikon D7100 and love the camera.... (show quote)


Just a thought. The batteries specifically for the D500 will work in the D7100 but the reverse is only true with quite a reduction in apparent shots per charge. So, yes both cameras can use the same battery but the one that came with the D500 will produce far more shots per charge than the D7100 battery will in the D500. In the D7100 it doesn't matter which you use.

I hope that doesn't confuse the issue too much. When the D500 first was released Nikon swapped older batteries for brand new ones to avoid the very problem you seem to be having. That program, I believe has ceased. Remember, the D7000/7100/7200 are all now discontinued models. The D7500/D500 and the Z50 are the current DX model cameras from Nikon. All three use the same batteries for what it is worth.

Bill Waxman

Reply
Oct 31, 2019 04:11:14   #
TonyBrown
 
I had a D7200 before my D500. The D500 is light years ahead in ease of use and what you are able to do. AF and the ability to track fast moving subjects is as good as it gets for a mid range price camera. Battery life has never been an issue for me, although I don’t use playback on every pic and dint always delete pics until I get home.

Reply
 
 
Oct 31, 2019 05:44:15   #
Drbobcameraguy Loc: Eaton Ohio
 
amfoto1 wrote:
The D500 also has "Flicker Reduction", which can be helpful for more accurate exposures under some types of indoor lighting, such as is often used in gyms.

It's been a problem for sports photographers forever. The shutter speeds we need to use to stop action don't work well with fluorescent, sodium vapor and some other types of lighting that cycle on and off very rapidly (60 hz in the U.S., 50 hz in Europe). If the shutter opening and closing in a fraction of a second happened to coincide with the lights' peak output.... all was good. But if it coincided with their "off" state, things got ugly!

Flicker Reduction, when it's enabled, detects the rapid cycling of the lights and times the shutter release to coincide with the peak output. Without this feature, shooting under those lights it wasn't uncommon to see half or more of your images underexposed.... some images were underexposed to the point they were totally unusable. The only "solutions" before this feature were to use a slower shutter speed, which didn't work for sports photography, or just take lots and lots of extra shots to be sure at least some of them are usable.

I've seen a huge difference using the similar feature on more recent Canon (all current models except for the most entry level T7, I think)..... It's only very rarely that I now see an underexposed image due to the lighting. I was worried that timing the shutter release would cause delays... but it's usually not noticeable Only very rarely do I notice that there seems to be a slight delay or that frame rates slow a little during continuous shooting.

Give it a try. I know the D500 has it. I think the D850 is the only other current Nikon DSLR which has the Flicker Reduction feature. I don't know if Canon or Nikon mirrorless have it, or if some do, which models.

Maybe the lights in the particular gym you're shooting weren't a problem. Just be aware of that feature, which you might find very helpful!
The D500 also has "Flicker Reduction", w... (show quote)

My D7200 has it and it works well.

Reply
Oct 31, 2019 05:48:32   #
Drbobcameraguy Loc: Eaton Ohio
 
RickTaylor wrote:
I agree the D 500 is fine camera. To say that is similar to the D5 is somewhat of an overstatement. Yes they will both take a picture. However if you shoot a lot of action photography the D5 blows it away. I know from experience as I have both of these bodies. If you ever have the opportunity to shoot the D5 you will understand what I am saying. Specifically in low light the fast focus and noise is significantly better than the D500

I dream about having a D5. For the price it should be light years ahead of the d500. Which for the price should be light years ahead of my D7200. Lol.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.