CHG_CANON wrote:
There's no logical discussion with an online troll. The only effective response is no response. They need a response to continue their filth. You just need the self-discipline to not fall into their game of engagement. Note how they have to ramp-up the nonsense to try to force a response. Give them no oxygen. Give them no acknowledgement.
Tip: check their posting history by clicking their name URL. No images on a photography site. Mostly filthy comments in the Attic. Then you know with confidence to ignore them when they wander out of the attic and try to spread that filth.
There's no logical discussion with an online troll... (
show quote)
"Wander out of the attic" What is wrong with you??
PaulBrit wrote:
I have 91 photographs taken in RAW from the 227 in total, and processed, where necessary, to show you.
My request is how to do it?
Do you want 10 or so every other day, or thereabouts, or the lot in one go, or not at all!
Your thoughts welcomed!
Pick your best five or ten and stop.
CHG_CANON wrote:
There's no logical discussion with an online troll. The only effective response is no response. They need a response to continue their filth. You just need the self-discipline to not fall into their game of engagement. Note how they have to ramp-up the nonsense to try to force a response. Give them no oxygen. Give them no acknowledgement.
Tip: check their posting history by clicking their name URL. No images on a photography site. Mostly filthy comments in the Attic. Then you know with confidence to ignore them when they wander out of the attic and try to spread that filth.
There's no logical discussion with an online troll... (
show quote)
FILTH???? You are a pathic. Identify "filth".Where is the post that someone like you thinks is filth?? You need to back that statement up. "Give them no acknowledgemrnt" Yet you have already done so.
PaulBrit wrote:
I have 91 photographs taken in RAW from the 227 in total, and processed, where necessary, to show you.
My request is how to do it?
Do you want 10 or so every other day, or thereabouts, or the lot in one go, or not at all!
Your thoughts welcomed!
Looking forward to seeing some of your captures.
Yes, do not feed the trolls.
CHG_CANON wrote:
There's no logical discussion with an online troll. The only effective response is no response. They need a response to continue their filth. You just need the self-discipline to not fall into their game of engagement. Note how they have to ramp-up the nonsense to try to force a response. Give them no oxygen. Give them no acknowledgement.
Tip: check their posting history by clicking their name URL. No images on a photography site. Mostly filthy comments in the Attic. Then you know with confidence to ignore them when they wander out of the attic and try to spread that filth.
There's no logical discussion with an online troll... (
show quote)
DeanS
Loc: Capital City area of North Carolina
Consider posting photos on a sharing web site and then post the link here.
DeanS wrote:
Consider posting photos on a sharing web site and then post the link here.
That’s a good idea but I shall be posting the photos and the story on my blog, Learning from Dogs, and will reserve just a few for this place. But thanks!
"There's no logical discussion with an online troll. The only effective response is no response. They need a response to continue their filth. You just need the self-discipline to not fall into their game of engagement. Note how they have to ramp-up the nonsense to try to force a response. Give them no oxygen. Give them no acknowledgement.
Tip: check their posting history by clicking their name URL. No images on a photography site. Mostly filthy comments in the Attic. Then you know with confidence to ignore them when they wander out of the attic and try to spread that filth."
You seemed to agree with him. Do you know of any "filth" he is referring to? Wander out of the attic? There is somthing wrong with him. Troll; | Definition of Troll by Merriam-Webster
https://www.merriam-webster.com › dictionary › troll
2 : a person who intentionally antagonizes others online by posting inflammatory, irrelevant, or offensive comments or other disruptive content. That would qualify him as a troll.
My crime was I dared to tell the guy who wanted to post his pictures from Utah that he did not have to listen to the guy who is now trolling me for my statement. That guy got mad because he did not like me telling anyone that you do not have to listen to him. So he creates lies and distortion. Now he is a hypocrite.
mikeroetex wrote:
Easy there TraderJohn, step back and take a breath. I did say " Either way, you get to decide, it's a free country!" And I said "a lot of professionals," not all. Maybe reading and comprehension are not your strong suits?
"maybe reading and comprehension are not your strong suits"
Would that be considered trolling someone?
Glad you see you ladies have stopped all this nonsense. I will admit a little disappointment about not finding out what the "filth" thing was all about.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.