Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Matte or Glossy Prints?
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Sep 13, 2012 09:19:27   #
Dinah Loc: Brisbane, Australia
 
I print on Ilford Premium Photo Satin paper, using an Epson printer - in between glossy and matte. Reason: I just like it better!

Reply
Sep 13, 2012 10:15:47   #
Photographer Jim Loc: Rio Vista, CA
 
I print using gloss, matte (a rag art paper), luster (semi-gloss), and for some images a pearl (sort of a pearlescent sheen, somewhat metallic). It all depends on the image. I have a series of macro shots of blown glass that I always print on gloss, for example, while most of my rustic still-life images are on the matte art paper (Entrada Rag). The semi-gloss "luster" finish is probably my favorite for most things. It is less reflective than gloss, but has a nicer color saturation and "glow" than a matte finish. Recently I have enjoyed printing a number of my images on a "pearl" paper, especially landscapes! It is wonderful for landscape images that feature sky and water. It makes dark blues, orange, pinks, and purples glow.

My lab, which I use for prints over 13x19 offers all of these four surface options, so I can pretty much match up my large and smaller prints.

Reply
Sep 13, 2012 11:05:56   #
CResQ Loc: Cobble Hill, BC
 
I like candid photography in B&W, when I print myself I do so on gloss.

Reply
 
 
Sep 13, 2012 11:15:32   #
Mudshark Loc: Illinois
 
I always prefer the luster papers. The Epson premium luster is excellent...by my standards. I have come to think there is a huge amount of photographic bovine scatology in the photo inkjet paper business.

Reply
Sep 13, 2012 11:19:37   #
SENSORLOUPE
 
CWhite wrote:
Just for fun. Whether you print your on photos or have a lab print them - which do you prefer, matte or glossy, and why? :lol:


Matte for sure for skin tones (portraits) and Animal shots

Glossy sometimes for flowers and landscape --makes the color "pop"

Some labs offer a --satin finish-- that is acceptable

Reply
Sep 13, 2012 11:53:20   #
jdventer Loc: Wallingford, CT, USA
 
Glossy. Matte looks dull and unsharp to me.

Reply
Sep 13, 2012 12:18:29   #
Mudshark Loc: Illinois
 
Mudshark wrote:
I always prefer the luster papers. The Epson premium luster is excellent...by my standards. I have come to think there is a huge amount of photographic bovine scatology in the photo inkjet paper business.


Oh...and I forgot to add...I love to roll around in bovine stuff...then run home and give my people a big ole hug....

Reply
 
 
Sep 13, 2012 12:32:43   #
watchwinder Loc: Churubusco, Indiana
 
Satin to matte hands down in my book !!!

Reply
Sep 13, 2012 13:16:29   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
CWhite wrote:
Just for fun. Whether you print your on photos or have a lab print them - which do you prefer, matte or glossy, and why? :lol:


Glossy for 11X14 and below because it helps create some extra "pop" for the viewer (try the comparison yourself with a matte versus gloss 4X6).

Matte for 13X19 and above because it creates an "artsy" almost-canvas effect that is fingerprint proof - and minor ripples show up too bad on glossy prints that large unless you glue them to a backing board.

Reply
Sep 13, 2012 13:35:59   #
jkm757 Loc: San Diego, Ca.
 
Mudshark wrote:
Mudshark wrote:
I always prefer the luster papers. The Epson premium luster is excellent...by my standards. I have come to think there is a huge amount of photographic bovine scatology in the photo inkjet paper business.


Oh...and I forgot to add...I love to roll around in bovine stuff...then run home and give my people a big ole hug....


:-D :thumbup: By the way, I like the new avitar.

Reply
Sep 13, 2012 13:37:56   #
Mudshark Loc: Illinois
 
jkm757 wrote:
Mudshark wrote:
Mudshark wrote:
I always prefer the luster papers. The Epson premium luster is excellent...by my standards. I have come to think there is a huge amount of photographic bovine scatology in the photo inkjet paper business.


Oh...and I forgot to add...I love to roll around in bovine stuff...then run home and give my people a big ole hug....


:-D :thumbup: By the way, I like the new avitar.


Same charming face...different day..

Reply
 
 
Sep 13, 2012 13:55:20   #
coco1964 Loc: Winsted Mn
 
Mudshark wrote:
I always prefer the luster papers. The Epson premium luster is excellent...by my standards. I have come to think there is a huge amount of photographic bovine scatology in the photo inkjet paper business.
Ditto on the Epson Premium Luster. I've found it to be a good paper for both color and B&W. It seems to be a great paper somewhere between matte and glossy which brings out nice colors with good contrast. Tried a number of the 5 star papers and settled on this which is nice because I find myself not having to change paper for different photos---happy medium.........

Reply
Sep 13, 2012 14:01:47   #
hlmichel Loc: New Hope, Minnesota
 
I usually get metallic, which is annoyingly reflective, but anything I print for myself is getting framed and hung, so once it's up it's not moving.

No one I have photographed has every asked for matte--it's always the glossy.

Reply
Sep 13, 2012 14:32:52   #
jdventer Loc: Wallingford, CT, USA
 
When I was a kid we a dog that did that every chance he got.

Reply
Sep 13, 2012 15:56:53   #
Raider Fan Loc: Lake County, IL.
 
CWhite wrote:
Just for fun. Whether you print your on photos or have a lab print them - which do you prefer, matte or glossy, and why? :lol:


Matte looks more elegant and has less reflection and no fingerprints!!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.