Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Ranch Road Redux
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Oct 2, 2019 09:31:37   #
SpyderJan Loc: New Smyrna Beach. FL
 
Beautifully done Jim. Well worth the effort

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 09:37:47   #
Cany143 Loc: SE Utah
 
cameraf4 wrote:
Not trying to start an argument here, and I do appreciate and admire the work involved in doing this, but I just compared the 2 shots side-by-side and there is virtually no difference. My question: why go through all that extra work?


The two versions are similar, but there are indeed differences. The easy answer to your question is that I wanted more 'real estate' left and right, and the only to get it without substantially altering the perspective and the placement of the elements was to do the pano. The attached should show what I mean.

I don't see your question as being argumentative in the slightest. Quite the opposite, and thanks for asking it. Apart from the extra work/time it took to make 11 exposures @ 1/80th -vs- one exposure @ 1/80th, and the minute or two of extra work it took Lr to stitch the pano, I didn't spend any more time or effort on the pano than I did the single exposure shot. And between the two, the pano satisfies me more.


(Download)

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 09:38:32   #
Bayouguy Loc: From Chauvin living in North Carolina
 
Cany143 wrote:
This may appear to be the same image I posted two days ago, but appearances can be deceiving. Where that previous image had been the result of a single exposure, the one shown here is an amalgamation of eleven separate vertically shot raw image files, merged in Lr and finished in Ps (yes, the current and dreaded 'subscription' CC versions). Tech irrelevancies include: hand-held D7200; AF Nikkor 10-20mm DX; 10mm setting at f/7.1 @ 1/80, ISO 100.

It takes time to make the image you actually want.
This may appear to be the same image I posted two ... (show quote)


WOW...very nice

Reply
 
 
Oct 2, 2019 09:41:23   #
Saigon Loc: Atlanta, GA
 
Cany143 wrote:
This may appear to be the same image I posted two days ago, but appearances can be deceiving. Where that previous image had been the result of a single exposure, the one shown here is an amalgamation of eleven separate vertically shot raw image files, merged in Lr and finished in Ps (yes, the current and dreaded 'subscription' CC versions). Tech irrelevancies include: hand-held D7200; AF Nikkor 10-20mm DX; 10mm setting at f/7.1 @ 1/80, ISO 100.

It takes time to make the image you actually want.
This may appear to be the same image I posted two ... (show quote)


It is beautiful Cany...Thx for your effort!

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 10:00:30   #
Cany143 Loc: SE Utah
 
Lastcastmike wrote:
Great stuff here as usual. My question is did you know you were going to get when you started or were you hopeful? Did you plan this exact comp and the number of multiple images or did you realize you could get it after you took all the photos.


I knew what the result would be before making any of the exposures. Others might do this sort of thing differently, but my normal method is to 'see' the whole then shoot however many overlapping shots as it may take to capture what I ultimately want. Its really pretty simple.

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 10:16:27   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
cameraf4 wrote:
Not trying to start an argument here, and I do appreciate and admire the work involved in doing this, but I just compared the 2 shots side-by-side and there is virtually no difference. My question: why go through all that extra work?


I sometimes question this also. Glad you did the background work to ask the question. But since I've never been truly successful at doing this, I do question the action.

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 10:42:30   #
blacks2 Loc: SF. Bay area
 
Beautiful, I love it.

Reply
 
 
Oct 2, 2019 10:44:05   #
Cany143 Loc: SE Utah
 
AzPicLady wrote:
I sometimes question this also. Glad you did the background work to ask the question. But since I've never been truly successful at doing this, I do question the action.


I think its good to question things sometimes. Doing so often leads to answers, and sometimes those answers answer questions that weren't necessarily asked. Asking often enough, and arriving at enough answers can streamline the process and make it quicker, pretty immediate in fact (or fancy), maybe to the point that some questions need less asking because the answers are already at hand.

I think it works with photography, too. Maybe its like adopting a Zen approach without having to be Zenny or woo-woo about much, questions or answers alike.

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 10:55:35   #
Retired CPO Loc: Travel full time in an RV
 
Thanks for the insight. I still don't do much in the way of post processing but learning slowly. I do know enough to know that the possibilities are almost endless. I guess it depends on #1 vision and #2 how much time you are willing to spend on the computer.
In this case, the time spent was obviously worth it and I, for one appreciate it.

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 11:29:35   #
Blair Shaw Jr Loc: Dunnellon,Florida
 
Cany143 wrote:
This may appear to be the same image I posted two days ago, but appearances can be deceiving. Where that previous image had been the result of a single exposure, the one shown here is an amalgamation of eleven separate vertically shot raw image files, merged in Lr and finished in Ps (yes, the current and dreaded 'subscription' CC versions). Tech irrelevancies include: hand-held D7200; AF Nikkor 10-20mm DX; 10mm setting at f/7.1 @ 1/80, ISO 100.

It takes time to make the image you actually want.
This may appear to be the same image I posted two ... (show quote)


Lovely image Cany......I like it.

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 12:02:23   #
Susan yamakawa
 
Cany143 wrote:
This may appear to be the same image I posted two days ago, but appearances can be deceiving. Where that previous image had been the result of a single exposure, the one shown here is an amalgamation of eleven separate vertically shot raw image files, merged in Lr and finished in Ps (yes, the current and dreaded 'subscription' CC versions). Tech irrelevancies include: hand-held D7200; AF Nikkor 10-20mm DX; 10mm setting at f/7.1 @ 1/80, ISO 100.

It takes time to make the image you actually want.
This may appear to be the same image I posted two ... (show quote)


I like your patience

Reply
 
 
Oct 2, 2019 12:17:04   #
fbeaston Loc: Vermont
 
Another outstanding image Jim ... that is truly a piece of art IMHO ... one worthy of hanging on any wall. Thanks for sharing.

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 14:40:57   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
Cany143 wrote:
I think its good to question things sometimes. Doing so often leads to answers, and sometimes those answers answer questions that weren't necessarily asked. Asking often enough, and arriving at enough answers can streamline the process and make it quicker, pretty immediate in fact (or fancy), maybe to the point that some questions need less asking because the answers are already at hand.

I think it works with photography, too. Maybe its like adopting a Zen approach without having to be Zenny or woo-woo about much, questions or answers alike.
I think its good to question things sometimes. Do... (show quote)



Reply
Oct 2, 2019 15:11:55   #
cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast
 
Gorgeous result, well worth the effort. A true Wall-hanger!

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 15:56:27   #
cameraf4 Loc: Delaware
 
Cany143 wrote:
The two versions are similar, but there are indeed differences. The easy answer to your question is that I wanted more 'real estate' left and right, and the only to get it without substantially altering the perspective and the placement of the elements was to do the pano. The attached should show what I mean.

I don't see your question as being argumentative in the slightest. Quite the opposite, and thanks for asking it. Apart from the extra work/time it took to make 11 exposures @ 1/80th -vs- one exposure @ 1/80th, and the minute or two of extra work it took Lr to stitch the pano, I didn't spend any more time or effort on the pano than I did the single exposure shot. And between the two, the pano satisfies me more.
The two versions are similar, but there are indeed... (show quote)


Thanx for explaining, Jim. Figured you would have a good reason that I just didn't see. Again, I admire the effort and the results very much. I'm just too lazy to put forth the effort now.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.