Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Ranch Road Redux
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Oct 1, 2019 12:50:28   #
Cany143 Loc: SE Utah
 
This may appear to be the same image I posted two days ago, but appearances can be deceiving. Where that previous image had been the result of a single exposure, the one shown here is an amalgamation of eleven separate vertically shot raw image files, merged in Lr and finished in Ps (yes, the current and dreaded 'subscription' CC versions). Tech irrelevancies include: hand-held D7200; AF Nikkor 10-20mm DX; 10mm setting at f/7.1 @ 1/80, ISO 100.

It takes time to make the image you actually want.


(Download)

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 13:07:36   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 13:14:20   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
An outstanding result, Jim!

Reply
 
 
Oct 1, 2019 13:23:36   #
jimcrna Loc: indiana/florida
 
cany. I have the same equipment you mention..I don't seem to get the same results. lol really great photo.

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 14:26:29   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
Cany143 wrote:
This may appear to be the same image I posted two days ago, but appearances can be deceiving. Where that previous image had been the result of a single exposure, the one shown here is an amalgamation of eleven separate vertically shot raw image files, merged in Lr and finished in Ps (yes, the current and dreaded 'subscription' CC versions). Tech irrelevancies include: hand-held D7200; AF Nikkor 10-20mm DX; 10mm setting at f/7.1 @ 1/80, ISO 100.

It takes time to make the image you actually want.
This may appear to be the same image I posted two ... (show quote)


Damm Dude, that is simply gorgeous. What was your exposure overlap?

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 14:43:59   #
Cany143 Loc: SE Utah
 
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
Damm Dude, that is simply gorgeous. What was your exposure overlap?


Thanks, rg. Overlap wasn't 'calculated' per se; none of the exposures were made on a tripod that would've shown degrees or percentages. Eyeballing the separate shots, though, they range from roughly 35 to 50% overlap.

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 15:22:38   #
Cany143 Loc: SE Utah
 
jimcrna wrote:
cany. I have the same equipment you mention..I don't seem to get the same results. lol really great photo.


I suspect that whatever differences there may between your 'same equipment' shots and mine is due to the fact that there are fewer manatees and/or alligators in Utah than there are in Florida. Either that, or the possibility (?) that there's less cheat grass in Indiana than there is out here. Now, had you used your gear here below the Books, Jim, you'd have gotten pretty much the same result. The only difference would be that your shot would've been from a few feet over that-a-way.

Reply
 
 
Oct 1, 2019 15:58:13   #
Cmbtvet Loc: Elmira, NY
 
Very nice

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 17:05:53   #
photophile Loc: Lakewood, Ohio, USA
 
Cany143 wrote:
This may appear to be the same image I posted two days ago, but appearances can be deceiving. Where that previous image had been the result of a single exposure, the one shown here is an amalgamation of eleven separate vertically shot raw image files, merged in Lr and finished in Ps (yes, the current and dreaded 'subscription' CC versions). Tech irrelevancies include: hand-held D7200; AF Nikkor 10-20mm DX; 10mm setting at f/7.1 @ 1/80, ISO 100.

It takes time to make the image you actually want.
This may appear to be the same image I posted two ... (show quote)


Love the lighting!

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 22:12:49   #
jkfrankum
 
This is a pretty amazing shot! Good work!

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 05:30:14   #
J-SPEIGHT Loc: Akron, Ohio
 
Cany143 wrote:
This may appear to be the same image I posted two days ago, but appearances can be deceiving. Where that previous image had been the result of a single exposure, the one shown here is an amalgamation of eleven separate vertically shot raw image files, merged in Lr and finished in Ps (yes, the current and dreaded 'subscription' CC versions). Tech irrelevancies include: hand-held D7200; AF Nikkor 10-20mm DX; 10mm setting at f/7.1 @ 1/80, ISO 100.

It takes time to make the image you actually want.
This may appear to be the same image I posted two ... (show quote)

Nice image Jim.

Reply
 
 
Oct 2, 2019 07:03:28   #
cameraf4 Loc: Delaware
 
Cany143 wrote:
This may appear to be the same image I posted two days ago, but appearances can be deceiving. Where that previous image had been the result of a single exposure, the one shown here is an amalgamation of eleven separate vertically shot raw image files, merged in Lr and finished in Ps (yes, the current and dreaded 'subscription' CC versions). Tech irrelevancies include: hand-held D7200; AF Nikkor 10-20mm DX; 10mm setting at f/7.1 @ 1/80, ISO 100.

It takes time to make the image you actually want.
This may appear to be the same image I posted two ... (show quote)


Not trying to start an argument here, and I do appreciate and admire the work involved in doing this, but I just compared the 2 shots side-by-side and there is virtually no difference. My question: why go through all that extra work?

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 07:48:22   #
allan catt Loc: gillingham,kent,uk
 
One of the nicest images I’ve seen on UHH,well done,

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 08:36:06   #
Bultaco Loc: Aiken, SC
 
Well done, love the back roads.

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 09:23:29   #
Lastcastmike
 
Great stuff here as usual. My question is did you know you were going to get when you started or were you hopeful? Did you plan this exact comp and the number of multiple images or did you realize you could get it after you took all the photos.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.