ltatko wrote:
Jerry-------thanks for stating------according to the Washington Post!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Len T.
There are plenty of older sources explaining what the Post is reporting...it's not exactly breaking news. It's all about a low sun angle plus the size and density of particles in the atmosphere scattering light that favor the red end of the spectrum -
https://www.economist.com/babbage/2014/04/08/sunsets-and-scientistsIt doesn't matter whether the source is volcanoes, coal-burning power plants, diesel trucks or forest fires. They all contribute to the effect but I would expect a dense outpouring of particles from a volcano or forest fire would increase the effect, locally. I read that Bejing's highest-in-the-world smog levels provide fantastic sunsets but you'd be wise to wear an activated charcoal gas mask if you want to photograph them.
Damn, lighten up. You liberals have no sense of humor at all.
Precisely what is fake? Do you have authenticated information that contradicts what is reported? Please share -- otherwise politically motivated broadsides do nothing but reduce your own credibility.
I have noticed intense colours just above the horizon right after sunset. But we get such beautiful sunsets here, I really didn't think of them as being out of the ordinary.
As one of those wild eyed liberals, I’ll take clean air over colorful sunsets any day!
Stan
There have been too many cloudless skies at sunset in my section of CT USA. I've wanted to photograph the Hartford skyline at sunset, but steel blue skies are not good sunset material. I need Russian volcanic activity!
Hey photoman022, lived in Glastonbury for 20+ yrs. Worked in Hartford!!
Len T.
here is one from Aug 27 2019 at Crater Lake.
dwmoar
Loc: Oregon, Willamette Valley
kpmac wrote:
If it was in the Washington Post it's fake news. Don't believe it.
Please give that "fake news" crap a rest for once
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.