Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Murder is illegal
Page <<first <prev 11 of 15 next> last>>
Sep 17, 2019 13:19:29   #
Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa
 
Kraken wrote:
The difference here in Canada is that when some politician from the 17th century creates a law that works very well in the 17th. century but is just plain stupid today is easily changed without everyone having a bird.


YOU ARE NOT AN AMERICAN. NOT YOUR BUSINESS.

Reply
Sep 17, 2019 13:20:04   #
Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa
 
cwp3420 wrote:
Murder is already outlawed. You sound more ignorant with every post you write.


TRUE POST.

Reply
Sep 17, 2019 13:25:44   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
cwp3420 wrote:
Murder is already outlawed. You sound more ignorant with every post you write.


Since my post. Started with:

So with your logic, we should not outlaw
Murder

To any logical person, it looks like I already knew that murder is already outlawed. How long did it take you to figure it out? Was that your original thought for the day?

Reply
 
 
Sep 17, 2019 13:43:21   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
Kraken wrote:
Your forefathers went hunting with single shot rifles and always got what they went after, so what happened to the mighty hunter of today?


They did?

Reply
Sep 17, 2019 14:15:59   #
Wrangler Loc: North Texas
 
Kraken wrote:
Your forefathers went hunting with single shot rifles and always got what they went after, so what happened to the mighty hunter of today?


My forefathers only rode horses and got where they wanted to go.

Do you only travel only by horseback instead of by automobile.

Reply
Sep 17, 2019 14:34:51   #
pendennis
 
Kraken wrote:
The difference here in Canada is that when some politician from the 17th century creates a law that works very well in the 17th. century but is just plain stupid today is easily changed without everyone having a bird.


Ahhh, the thinking of Canadians. The right to keep and bear arms long predates the United States Constitution. In fact, it originates in England as part of their common law evolution, and the signing of the Magna Carta in the 13th Century. In fact individual freedoms in England predate even the Magna Carta.

The United States Constitution recognizes the unalienable rights of its citizens, and enumerates both explicitly and implicitly those rights.

Canada has no such guarantees for individuals. You are at the beck and call of the Canadian Government. While you have certain "rights" guaranteed within the Canadian Charter, they're routinely stepped on by the central government with virtually no recourse.

One instance: Smith & Wesson produced revolvers which were shipped all over the world. One of those models was the .357 Magnum, later the Model 27. Since it's development, and until the mid-late 1970's, it was shipped with a 3.5" (optional) barrel, then with a 4" barrel. On a whim, the Canadian government banned the 3.5" model along with any other revolver that had a barrel of less than 4". In the U.S., those revolvers would have been protected, but the Canadian government can pass ex post facto laws whenever they see fit. In the U.S., the Constitution prevents that both at the state and Federal levels.

Reply
Sep 17, 2019 14:44:15   #
cwp3420
 
Kraken wrote:
Your forefathers went hunting with single shot rifles and always got what they went after, so what happened to the mighty hunter of today?


Your forefathers rode everywhere on horses too? Have you upgraded to the latest horse and buggy, or are you a purist and still only ride a horse?

Reply
 
 
Sep 17, 2019 15:19:14   #
pendennis
 
Kraken wrote:
Your forefathers went hunting with single shot rifles and always got what they went after, so what happened to the mighty hunter of today?


You are as ignorant as you are naive.

Single shot rifles were wildly inaccurate, with the exception of the rifled models made by custom gunsmiths (e.g. the Jaeger, Pennsylvania, and Kentucky). Most were smooth bore, partially rusted, and incapable of hitting anything much beyond 50 yards. Most colonists carried a smooth bore "fowler" which was a combination of a .62 caliber smooth bore and shotgun (approximately 20 gauge). Most game was taken with the shotgun, with deer rarely taken except by more accurate rifled guns; a deer shot with the .62 caliber ball was a rarity.

Until the early 19th Century, military arms were similarly smooth bored, not rifled. Even the U.S. Colonial army didn't use rifled weapons. They were armed with captured English Brown Bess and French Charleville smooth bores. U.S. made rifles were generally reserved for snipers, and they were accurate out to +300 yards.

Taking game in the colonial days gave the hunter a success rate about that of a wolf, abround a 1 in 10 success rate. Many were more successful trapping game than shooting.

Today's "mighty" hunters fare a lot better, first shot hits are up around 50%, and first shot kills below that. Animals rarely, if ever, drop when shot, whether with an arrow or rifle bullet. They frequently run off, leaving a blood trail for the hunter to follow. However, even using the trusty Winchester Model 94, more game has been missed the first shot than cleanly killed. The hunter stands a greater chance with a good scoped bolt action rifle. And most states don't allow deer hunting with calibers like the .223; they require calibers of .25 centerfire, and larger. The .30-06 is still one of the most popular rounds.

I own a couple of custom-made flintlock rifles, and while they're capable of fine accuracy out past 200 yards, they were built using modern rifling and building methods.

Reply
Sep 17, 2019 15:32:18   #
Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa
 
pendennis wrote:
You are as ignorant as you are naive.

Single shot rifles were wildly inaccurate, with the exception of the rifled models made by custom gunsmiths (e.g. the Jaeger, Pennsylvania, and Kentucky). Most were smooth bore, partially rusted, and incapable of hitting anything much beyond 50 yards. Most colonists carried a smooth bore "fowler" which was a combination of a .62 caliber smooth bore and shotgun (approximately 20 gauge). Most game was taken with the shotgun, with deer rarely taken except by more accurate rifled guns; a deer shot with the .62 caliber ball was a rarity.

Until the early 19th Century, military arms were similarly smooth bored, not rifled. Even the U.S. Colonial army didn't use rifled weapons. They were armed with captured English Brown Bess and French Charleville smooth bores. U.S. made rifles were generally reserved for snipers, and they were accurate out to +300 yards.

Taking game in the colonial days gave the hunter a success rate about that of a wolf, abround a 1 in 10 success rate. Many were more successful trapping game than shooting.

Today's "mighty" hunters fare a lot better, first shot hits are up around 50%, and first shot kills below that. Animals rarely, if ever, drop when shot, whether with an arrow or rifle bullet. They frequently run off, leaving a blood trail for the hunter to follow. However, even using the trusty Winchester Model 94, more game has been missed the first shot than cleanly killed. The hunter stands a greater chance with a good scoped bolt action rifle. And most states don't allow deer hunting with calibers like the .223; they require calibers of .25 centerfire, and larger. The .30-06 is still one of the most popular rounds.

I own a couple of custom-made flintlock rifles, and while they're capable of fine accuracy out past 200 yards, they were built using modern rifling and building methods.
You are as ignorant as you are naive. br br Singl... (show quote)


Good explanation, but you are talking guns to someone who thinks all of us should have our guns taken away and be just like canada.

Reply
Sep 17, 2019 15:46:03   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
Kraken wrote:
Your forefathers went hunting with single shot rifles and always got what they went after, so what happened to the mighty hunter of today?


Our forefathers had semiautomatics. What are you talking about?

Reply
Sep 17, 2019 17:07:04   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
Wrangler wrote:
My forefathers only rode horses and got where they wanted to go.

Do you only travel only by horseback instead of by automobile.


By leftist logic freedom of the press only applies to hand powered movable type handbills.

Reply
 
 
Sep 17, 2019 17:07:51   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
yhtomit wrote:
Our forefathers had semiautomatics. What are you talking about?


If he knew, he’d stop embarrassing himself.

Reply
Sep 17, 2019 17:17:28   #
Angmo
 
Kraken wrote:
Your forefathers went hunting with single shot rifles and always got what they went after, so what happened to the mighty hunter of today?



Reply
Sep 17, 2019 17:20:34   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
Does not believe in guns laws, sounds like UHH conservatives.

Reply
Sep 17, 2019 17:24:58   #
Angmo
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
Does not believe in guns laws, sounds like UHH conservatives.


PROJECT much?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 11 of 15 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.