jcboy3 wrote:
The key takeaway from your post was: Don't protect children, protect guns, protect fetuses.
No, still looks like 1,2,3 to me. And I didn't bring up women, whom you want to force to have babies.
New priority: 1. Guns, 2. Fetuses, 3. Women, 4. Children
US maternal mortality ratio (2015): 26.4 per 100,000, total 700
US childhood gun mortality ratio (2015): 5 per 100,000, total 2,462
US abortion ratio (2015): 188 per 1000 live births, total 638,169.
Since many abortions are for the health of the mother, the numbers might skew higher, but if there were no abortions, one could expect about 166 additional deaths from pregnancy.
Keeping guns and fetuses means killing women (166) and children (2462).
I've always felt it was more important to save the women and children.
The key takeaway from your post was: Don't protec... (
show quote)
The takeaway from your post is that you simply twist what someone posts to fit your agenda, the same way assign labels to anything in an attempt to make less objectionable. Same old, same old.