Who's the k**ler here. Maybe it's time to re think how we think
Sep 8, 2019 10:21:07 #
Who's the k**ler here. Maybe it's time to re-think how we think
Who's doing the most k*****gs and yet we are screaming about more gun laws? Not very logical in my book.
Who's doing the most k*****gs and yet we are screaming about more gun laws? Not very logical in my book.
Sep 8, 2019 10:46:14 #
Sep 8, 2019 10:49:41 #
I see. So you're okay with k*****g children after they're born, but not before.
Your post makes no sense. It's like saying, we can't cure cancer so we won't treat anyone that has the flue.
Your post makes no sense. It's like saying, we can't cure cancer so we won't treat anyone that has the flue.
Sep 8, 2019 10:56:39 #
Frank T wrote:
I see. So you're okay with k*****g children after they're born, but not before.
Your post makes no sense. It's like saying, we can't cure cancer so we won't treat anyone that has the flue.
Your post makes no sense. It's like saying, we can't cure cancer so we won't treat anyone that has the flue.
That's about an ignorant reply. Did I say it was OK to k**l children. Don't think so. What I do say is that we better get our priorities in order and attack first what will do the most and it isn't guns.
Sep 8, 2019 11:03:20 #
Huey Driver wrote:
Who's the k**ler here. Maybe it's time to re-think how we think
Who's doing the most k*****gs and yet we are screaming about more gun laws? Not very logical in my book.
Who's doing the most k*****gs and yet we are screaming about more gun laws? Not very logical in my book.
It's a fetus.
Sep 8, 2019 11:12:04 #
jcboy3 wrote:
It's a fetus.
A fetus is a living thing that given the chance someday will become a person. I don't recall hearing of any guns doing that?
Sep 8, 2019 11:18:41 #
Huey Driver wrote:
A fetus is a living thing that given the chance someday will become a person. I don't recall hearing of any guns doing that?
So this is your priority: 1. Guns, 2. Fetuses, 3. Children
I get it.
Sep 8, 2019 11:51:59 #
jcboy3 wrote:
So this is your priority: 1. Guns, 2. Fetuses, 3. Children
I get it.
I get it.
You must be thick between the ears. My priority is exactly backward (3,2,1) from what you just posted.
Sep 8, 2019 12:27:06 #
Huey Driver wrote:
You must be thick between the ears. My priority is exactly backward (3,2,1) from what you just posted.
The key takeaway from your post was: Don't protect children, protect guns, protect fetuses.
No, still looks like 1,2,3 to me. And I didn't bring up women, whom you want to force to have babies.
New priority: 1. Guns, 2. Fetuses, 3. Women, 4. Children
US maternal mortality ratio (2015): 26.4 per 100,000, total 700
US childhood gun mortality ratio (2015): 5 per 100,000, total 2,462
US a******n ratio (2015): 188 per 1000 live births, total 638,169.
Since many a******ns are for the health of the mother, the numbers might skew higher, but if there were no a******ns, one could expect about 166 additional deaths from pregnancy.
Keeping guns and fetuses means k*****g women (166) and children (2462).
I've always felt it was more important to save the women and children.
Sep 8, 2019 12:28:22 #
Huey Driver wrote:
A fetus is a living thing that given the chance someday will become a person. I don't recall hearing of any guns doing that?
Sperm is a living thing. How many have you k**led?
Sep 8, 2019 13:07:06 #
Frank T wrote:
Sperm is a living thing. How many have you k**led?
If you could ban all the guns in the US and you could also make a******n illegal everywhere in the U.S., based on current statistics which would save the most lives? I think you know the answer. Just makes sense to me to spend your money first where you get the biggest bang for your buck and that puts guns way down the list. Why don't we see as much rhetoric about a******n, drugs, knife k*****gs, auto fatalities, etc. as we do about guns? Fact is all those things mentioned individually all take way more lives than guns. But you keep right on trying to avoid the facts and spewing garbage that guns are the problem and sweeping actual statistics under the carpet to try and prove your point as you have been brainwashed to do. If you disagree with anything I said please, prove I'm wrong with facts not with verbal flatulence.
Sep 8, 2019 13:18:33 #
Huey Driver wrote:
If you could ban all the guns in the US and you co... (show quote)
Fetuses aren't lives. So banning guns wins.
Sep 8, 2019 13:26:40 #
jcboy3 wrote:
Fetuses aren't lives. So banning guns wins.
If that's your best reply? What about the other things I mentioned that k**l way more people than guns? You seem to have a fixation with fetuses and if that's your ONLY argument your wasting everyone's time.
Sep 8, 2019 13:45:21 #
jcboy3 wrote:
The key takeaway from your post was: Don't protec... (show quote)
He’s right. You had it backwards. If you really thought it was important to save children you’d see that.
Sep 8, 2019 15:22:06 #
Rose42 wrote:
He’s right. You had it backwards. If you really thought it was important to save children you’d see that.
I don't think it is important to save fetuses.
Women and children, yes. Which is why I think the rising maternal mortality rate in the US should be of concern. But that is a social issue, and Republicans h**e social issues. They don't want to address the need for pre-natal care. They just want you to have a baby, and if you survive then good for you.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.