Kmgw9v wrote:
No, that is not what I said—at all. People that strive to be nice and tell the photographer that an image is “good” “nice work”, “ interesting” or otherwise suggest that an image is in some way remarkable, when in fact it is no more than a common, ordinary snapshot, are dishonest; and do a disservice to the image maker with false, unwarranted praise. I said nothing about dishonesty relating to looking at composition—Read careful for content, not what you think is the writer’s intent.
Further, I insulted no one. I applauded honesty and labeled it refreshing for a forum that is abundant with false praise for amateurish, unremarkable snapshots—like the one in this thread.
You need to read either slower to understand, or at least more carefully as to not misunderstand the written word.
No, that is not what I said—at all. People that st... (
show quote)
Since I read comments like yours which I intend to criticize very slowly, to make sure I understand, for the sake of truth and the person, perhaps you can point out where in your comment of 's post, I went wrong:
------------------------------------------------
"Kmgw9v (a regular here) (online) Joined: Dec 23, 2013 Posts: 7378 Loc: Miami, Florida
_____________________________
CPR wrote:
Sorry, I don't see anything but an out of focus guy walking up some stairs.
_____________________________
"An honest response--for a change. Refreshing."
--------------------------------------------------------
Actually, it seems it is you who have the agenda, by clearly implying support for CPR's "refreshing, honest response," then in the follow up by criticizing UHH as a "forum that is abundant with false praise for amateurish, unremarkable snapshots—like the one in this thread."
And you cannot understand why I, or others here, see you as insulting.
From what I've read here, it seems you are self-contradictory, cowardly, and silly. From now on, I, and others who see this I hope, will pay no attention to your verbiage.