I agree the court should be neutral. They should all be strict originalist who look at what was intended by the writers of the Constitution and of subsequent laws and only look at that. Instead liberal judges and unfortunately some more conservative ones interpret the Constitution, which is not their duty. They job is to make sure that laws conform to the Constitution. Big difference.

If all judges looked at the original clear intent we would all be better off. You seem angry that the five "conservative" judges often vote in a block, but don't seem to have any problem when the four liberal judges do.

And if you look it is the "conservatives" who frequently break ranks, not the liberals. Remember it was Roberts who wrote 22 pages explaining how the Affordable Care Act was unconstitutional and then one page allowing it. The conservative judges were flabbergasted because the night before the ruling was announced Roberts had said that he agreed with them and his written opinion proves it's unconstitutional.

And look at this summer how often Trumps two appointees have broken ranks. It is a significant number of times.