Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
targa75 wrote:
Having heard arguments for both 50mm
and 35mm for use as standard lens, was
wondering which of the two you
folks would recommend?
50mm or 35mm
Go to for birds and wildlife - Sigma Sport 150-600
Landscape - 45mm or 85mm PC-E, or 70-200 F2.8
Architectural - 24mm or 45mm PC-E
Not sure? Take everything from 14mm to 600mm.
DirtFarmer
Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
targa75 wrote:
Having heard arguments for both 50mm
and 35mm for use as standard lens, was
wondering which of the two you
folks would recommend?
50mm or 35mm
I have a 35 and a 50. They sit on the shelf.
I have a 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, and 200-500. Which one gets used depends on what I'm shooting, but they all get some use.
If I'm out and about, I will generally use my 28-300.
This is a question that would best be answered by saying, what ever you like. But I'll tell you what is my "go-too" lens, which will upset the conventional applecart. Both on film and FF digital, and with the equivalent on "crop frame" sensors, it's the 28. So say it, I'm nuts.
targa75 wrote:
Having heard arguments for both 50mm
and 35mm for use as standard lens, was
wondering which of the two you
folks would recommend?
50mm or 35mm
Short answer:
On a full-frame body, the lens' "effective" focal length is the lens' actual focal length..
On a crop-sensor body, the "effective" focal length is the lens' focal length x the crop factor of your body. Examples: Canon's crop factor is 1.6. Nikon is 1.5. Micro 4/3 is 2.0.
Is your camera crop-sensor or full-frame?
What "effective" focal length do you WANT TO USE?
Traditionally, 45-55mm is considered "normal".
35mm is mild wide-angle.
80mm is short telephoto, also considered a good portrait focal length.
Picture Taker wrote:
IN THEORY (WITH A 35MM FILM CAMERA) THE 50MM LENS WAS WHAT THE EYE SAW (SOME SAID 35MM). TOSDAY A "FULL FRAME CAMERA" IS THE SAME AS A 35MM CAMERA. BUT, WE ARE NOT CONSTANT WITH THAT (35mm X 24mm). SO BASICALLY A FULL FRAME IS THE FULL FRAME CAMERA WHEN USING A LENSE, THE LENES IS AS MARKED. WHEN YOU DON'T USE A FULL FRAME CAMERA THEY NEED TO BE RECALCULATED ie. WITH CANON A 100mm IS A 160mm (200 IS 320 etc.) Nikon simpler 100 is 150 and 200 is 300. each brand must be corrected for true lens focal length unless they are full fram.
I hope this helps. I use both full and non full frame and have stickers on my lens caps with both sizes (ie. 100/160-- 10/16 etc)
IN THEORY (WITH A 35MM FILM CAMERA) THE 50MM LENS ... (
show quote)
With respect, there is no reason to shout by using all caps. In most forums it is classed as rude.
Dennis
Bill P wrote:
This is a question that would best be answered by saying, what ever you like. But I'll tell you what is my "go-too" lens, which will upset the conventional applecart. Both on film and FF digital, and with the equivalent on "crop frame" sensors, it's the 28. So say it, I'm nuts.
Actually I just reread the question from the OP. He simply asks which the members would use, 35 or 50. He doesn't ask anything about film/digital/crop frame or full frame. Just 35 or 50.
I think the answers would be pretty interesting IF members stuck to the question asked.
Dennis
dennis2146 wrote:
Actually I just reread the question from the OP. He simply asks which the members would use, 35 or 50. He doesn't ask anything about film/digital/crop frame or full frame. Just 35 or 50.
I think the answers would be pretty interesting IF members stuck to the question asked.
Dennis
Can't answer the original question without knowing whether full-frame (digital or film) or crop-sensor, and what he/she wants to be ready to shoot.
nadelewitz wrote:
Can't answer the original question without knowing whether full-frame (digital or film) or crop-sensor, and what he/she wants to be ready to shoot.
Yes you can. You simply say you choose either a 35 or 50 as I did. You are assuming he is not capable of figuring it out.
Dennis
yorkiebyte
Loc: Scottsdale, AZ/Bandon by the Sea, OR
dennis2146 wrote:
Yes you can. You simply say you choose either a 35 or 50 as I did. You are assuming he is not capable of figuring it out.
Dennis
...Yep! That right there.
That would depend on which camera I'm going to be using and what I'm going to be photographing. I don't really have a "go to" anything without those two questions being answered first.
--Bob
targa75 wrote:
Having heard arguments for both 50mm
and 35mm for use as standard lens, was
wondering which of the two you
folks would recommend?
50mm or 35mm
billnikon wrote:
24-120 mm is my STANDARD LENS. That said, IMHO, I like the 50. I believe it is more useful than the 35. If I was doing it all over again, I would go 50 first, then either a 28 or 24.
Love this lens. I had the 28-70 zoom but when it died I bought the 24-120 and love it for the greater reach that it has. The are is some compromise in shallowness in depth of field but I rarely need the 2.8 for light gathering.
dennis2146 wrote:
Yes you can. You simply say you choose either a 35 or 50 as I did. You are assuming he is not capable of figuring it out.
Dennis
Just asking the original question would lead one to question his ability to figure it out. Figure WHAT out?
F/1.2, 1.4, 1.8....is also a factor even if we assume FF and 50... itsnever simple...😳
dennis2146 wrote:
Actually I just reread the question from the OP. He simply asks which the members would use, 35 or 50. He doesn't ask anything about film/digital/crop frame or full frame. Just 35 or 50.
I think the answers would be pretty interesting IF members stuck to the question asked.
Dennis
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.