Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR (Refurbished)
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
May 25, 2019 08:59:41   #
colt4x5 Loc: Central Connecticut
 
David in Dallas wrote:
Has anyone bought a refurbished lens from Nikon?



I have bought several refurbished lenses from Nikon, and have not had any issues with any of them. And for me, each time I bought refurbished, the lower price was what allowed me to afford the lens in the first place.

Reply
May 25, 2019 09:38:46   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
joer wrote:
Since you are not into birds a better option for you might be a 100-400 lend. There are several brands available for Nikon. Lighter, smaller, therefore easier to handle and transport, more versatile, and just as sharp, perhaps more so.



Reply
May 25, 2019 10:05:33   #
tshift Loc: Overland Park, KS.
 
warrenvon wrote:
If as noted . . you can handle the weight . . .then buy it use it and then sell it when you are back. Far cheaper than renting one for two weeks.
The D7100 will handle it nicely and it is a very good lens for shooting wildlife in Africa.


Not true. You can rent this lens in Overland Park for $65.00/week. Thanks

Tom

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2019 10:06:06   #
fecraly
 
Been to Africa twice; Kenya/Tanzania most recently. I had D80 with Nikon 28-300. Now have D500. Many times needed more reach. I suggest at least 500. You travel in safari vehicle 4x4s; ample places to support a heavy camera/lens with a bean bag rest. Almost never have to carry that weight unsupported. No room for monopod or tripod. Just NEVER change lens in the bush--dust like you have never seen!!

Reply
May 25, 2019 10:41:41   #
redlegfrog
 
David in Dallas wrote:
I just received a message offering the subject lens for $999.95 and I'm wondering what the folks here think of it. I'm going to Kenya, Africa in September for about 2 weeks and my current lens is a DX 18-200VR2; my camera is a D7100. I have been considering renting a longer lens for this trip. I can afford to purchase this lens, but wonder how good it is and how much use I'd get out of it (I'm not a "Birder").

I'm open to suggestions.


Buying refurbished from Nikon needs a little caution. Their warranty is very short, I didn't pay attention to this and got stuck with one of their bad lens.
I got busy and didn't do proper lens test until after the 90 days had passed. When I contacted Nikon their response was Oh Well!
Get you testing done early and things should be OK.

Reply
May 25, 2019 10:43:52   #
carl hervol Loc: jacksonville florida
 
Coolpix is not as sharp it nothing more than a glorified point shoot had one and sent it back.

Reply
May 25, 2019 11:21:28   #
saxman71 Loc: Wenatchee
 
Assuming this is a once in a lifetime trip and photographing wild animals is on your list of things to do, I suggest your rent a Nikon D500 and a Tamron 150x600 G2. The D7100 has a pitifully small buffer that tends to fill up very quickly and may cause you to miss some shots. And you will want as much reach as you can get on this trip so the longer the lens the better.

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2019 12:29:56   #
David in Dallas Loc: Dallas, Texas, USA
 
Thanks, everyone, for your comments. I did go ahead and purchase the lens. It will come in a few days and I'm looking forward to wringing it out. I know it's heavy and long and will be awkward to handle, and I will need to learn how to control it.

I appreciate all the advice.

Reply
May 25, 2019 13:46:23   #
dubyacee
 
You won't regret it! I use mine on a D7200 and just love it. Like it's been said, you won't likely be trekking very far.

Reply
May 25, 2019 14:30:54   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
tomcat wrote:
I buy refurbished lenses from Nikon often. The focusing AF and zoom features are restored back to factory specs and cleaned. They look brand new when Nikon finishes with them---no scratches, scuffs, etc


Your quote, "The focusing AF and zoom features are restored back to factory specs and cleaned" is very misleading.
The vast majority, 98% of them at least get only a cursory check, to make sure they are working properly, most all refurbished lenses are actually lenses that customers have returned because they FELT they were not working properly. Most of these lenses have NO PROBLEM, they are run through a general check, they are not restored mainly because they do not have to be restored. And they are cleaned only on the outside, there is no INTERNAL cleaning. They look brand new because they are, they are brand new lenses returned by consumers, and since they are returned, they cannot be sold as new.
So, yes, refurbished lenses are a great value, the vast majority are not SUPER checked over, BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE TO BE, because their was nothing wrong with MOST of them in the first place.
I like to refer to these refurbished lenses as someone else's BAD COPY.
Finally, just let me say that the majority of the refurbished lenses are returned by very, very fussy photographers that would not be pleased if they could walk on water.

Reply
May 25, 2019 14:33:11   #
Ed Chu Loc: Las Vegas NV
 
David in Dallas wrote:
I just received a message offering the subject lens for $999.95 and I'm wondering what the folks here think of it. I'm going to Kenya, Africa in September for about 2 weeks and my current lens is a DX 18-200VR2; my camera is a D7100. I have been considering renting a longer lens for this trip. I can afford to purchase this lens, but wonder how good it is and how much use I'd get out of it (I'm not a "Birder").

I'm open to suggestions.


just bought one at 10% off ( now 25% off; have never seen that discount ); to take to Kenya in Aug w/D500

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2019 14:46:14   #
InfiniteISO Loc: The Carolinas, USA
 
I just recently purchased a vintage Nikkor AF 75-300

https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/75300.htm

It comes with an integral tripod mount point. The 7100 will focus it and on a DX body it works out to 115 to 450 mm (35mm Equivalent). I paid $85 dollars for one in excellent condition. It does not have VR but if you're shooting from a tripod it doesn't matter. It's not a bad piece of glass and you don't like it, you're not out anything. One benefit of having a 7000 series Nikon is the ability to use these older AF lenses.

Reply
May 25, 2019 16:10:28   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
I used my 200-500 for my trip to Africa a few years ago. It worked perfectly. I used it on a D800. No issues with reach but sometimes was too close. That will be more of an issue with DX camera. Be patient and ask the driver to back off when needed.

Those who recommend bean bags have never been in the vehicles four camps in Zimbabwe and Botwana used. They are open landcruisers with tiered seating. Nothing to put a beanbag on. I tried a monopod one day...worthless. Carry the camera on your lap or, if there is one, on the seat next to you and handhold.

I tried different settings and settled on M mode with auto ISO and spot metering. AF-S single point. Set fstop to 5.6 and min shutter to 1/500 (you might want to use 1/750). All images were sharp and I was shooting while others were composing.

Reply
May 25, 2019 16:18:17   #
Barndog Loc: Tacoma
 
From what I have read and heard it is a little soft at 500. I looked at comparisons of the Nikon against the Sigma 150-600 f5.6-6.3 Sport and, I have decided against the Nikon and will go with the Sigma. If that helps at all. The Nikon is suppose to be sharp up to 500mm.

Reply
May 25, 2019 16:22:34   #
DaveyDitzer Loc: Western PA
 
I have this lens And like it,
However for this trip and with a crop sensor i’d Go shorter and lighter

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.