pendennis wrote:
To the contrary. Every added dollar in business cost, whether materials, labor, taxes, shipping costs, etc., lowers the profit of a company. It costs the business real dollars to add functionality to collect and remit taxes to over 10K jurisdictions. It's not a zero-sum transaction. Prior to the Supreme Court decision there was no reason for B&H to collect sales/use tax, except for New York sales. At some point the business has to lower its profit margin, or pass along those increased costs to the customer. And in the 21st Century, no one is going to pay a clerk to look up all these disparate sales and use tax rates, and manually apply them to their sales programs.
That B&H, or any other retailer, resorts to using incentives to maintain their business share percentage, is just another sales promotion. They anticipate increasing volume to compensate for lost revenue. However, this only lasts until Adorama, Cameta, Best Buy, etc., all trot out their versions.
To the contrary. Every added dollar in business c... (
show quote)
I will not continue to argue your attempts to convince me or anyone else, that this is some big costly program for businesses to implement a sales tax program. It's old news and all that is happening is applying it to more states. You may wish to investigate software that has been around for years. That was the point of my post and your vast knowledge of the business world will not change my assertion.