Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
D600 Selling Price
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jan 10, 2013 11:49:50   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Db7423 wrote:
Interesting to note the D600 is now selling at B&H for $2000 - body only. Does this mean the spot problem has been fixed or that the supply is limited which could mean Nikon is not making them any longer?

Considering that it began selling at $2,099, that's not much of a difference. I think this camera will enjoy a long career.

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 11:52:04   #
eplain
 
They SAY!... "After 10,000 acutations - it stops"

hell. ill do 2500 on vacation! HAHA

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 13:16:17   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
eplain wrote:
They SAY!... "After 10,000 acutations - it stops"

hell. ill do 2500 on vacation! HAHA

Who is "they," and what are they talking about? If you mean that a DSLR stops taking pictures after 10,000 clicks, that would be very unusual. Getting 100,000 clicks should be the norm. You would have to shoot 50 pictures a day every day for almost 5 1/2 years to get to 100,000. By that time, you'd be ready for a new camera anyway.

Reply
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Jan 10, 2013 13:34:35   #
eplain
 
jerryc41 wrote:
eplain wrote:
They SAY!... "After 10,000 acutations - it stops"

hell. ill do 2500 on vacation! HAHA

Who is "they," and what are they talking about? If you mean that a DSLR stops taking pictures after 10,000 clicks, that would be very unusual. Getting 100,000 clicks should be the norm. You would have to shoot 50 pictures a day every day for almost 5 1/2 years to get to 100,000. By that time, you'd be ready for a new camera anyway.


No. I was referring to the oil issue.... of course

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 14:01:08   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
eplain wrote:
jerryc41 wrote:
eplain wrote:
They SAY!... "After 10,000 acutations - it stops"

hell. ill do 2500 on vacation! HAHA

Who is "they," and what are they talking about? If you mean that a DSLR stops taking pictures after 10,000 clicks, that would be very unusual. Getting 100,000 clicks should be the norm. You would have to shoot 50 pictures a day every day for almost 5 1/2 years to get to 100,000. By that time, you'd be ready for a new camera anyway.


No. I was referring to the oil issue.... of course
quote=jerryc41 quote=eplain They SAY!... "A... (show quote)

OK. Got it.

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 14:47:15   #
yayi60 Loc: Spain
 
I got a D600 in December and I love it!!! Not problems whatsoever... :)

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 14:50:06   #
DaveHam Loc: Reading UK
 
I returned this week from five workshops in Africa run by our non - Nikon organisation. We had a number of D600's, D800's and D4's. None of the D600 users had experienced any problems at all; the issue was discussed extensively and the conclusion reached was that the problem is exagerrated. The D800 users were to a man over the moon with their cameras though some were having to adapt technique. By a number of users I'm talking about 15 D600 and D800 from USA, Canada and UK. In fact the only kit problem was with my D4 which has developed soft focus issues probably because of handling problems in a light aircraft..
Not doubting that there has been a problem with the D600 my point is that a lot of people are being made nervous about this apparently without cause. Everyone who was a Nikon user on the workshoops was talking about the 'D600 problem' - but no one had experienced it, from long term users to people who had new units for Christmas.
I've no Nikon involvement; I guess that I am merely trying to point out that the tidal wave of 'D600 contamination' and 'D800 focus' stories may perhaps represent the same issues being re-hashed again and again. Certainly the impression that the last five weeks left was that the issue has been over played and may not in fact be a currrent problem.
People wanting to buy Nikon FX cameras should hear this as well as the problems before coming to a conclusion.

Reply
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Jan 10, 2013 15:16:14   #
sbesaw Loc: Boston
 
Db7423 wrote:
Interesting to note the D600 is now selling at B&H for $2000 - body only. Does this mean the spot problem has been fixed or that the supply is limited which could mean Nikon is not making them any longer?


It means that the sale Nikon had, on many of their cameras for the Holidays, is now over

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 15:17:40   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
DaveHam wrote:
I returned this week from five workshops in Africa run by our non - Nikon organisation. We had a number of D600's, D800's and D4's. None of the D600 users had experienced any problems at all; the issue was discussed extensively and the conclusion reached was that the problem is exagerrated. The D800 users were to a man over the moon with their cameras though some were having to adapt technique. By a number of users I'm talking about 15 D600 and D800 from USA, Canada and UK. In fact the only kit problem was with my D4 which has developed soft focus issues probably because of handling problems in a light aircraft..
Not doubting that there has been a problem with the D600 my point is that a lot of people are being made nervous about this apparently without cause. Everyone who was a Nikon user on the workshoops was talking about the 'D600 problem' - but no one had experienced it, from long term users to people who had new units for Christmas.
I've no Nikon involvement; I guess that I am merely trying to point out that the tidal wave of 'D600 contamination' and 'D800 focus' stories may perhaps represent the same issues being re-hashed again and again. Certainly the impression that the last five weeks left was that the issue has been over played and may not in fact be a currrent problem.
People wanting to buy Nikon FX cameras should hear this as well as the problems before coming to a conclusion.
I returned this week from five workshops in Africa... (show quote)

Thank you for that. I haven't experienced the spots, either. It just goes to show that that are downsides to the instant communication offered by the Web.

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 16:46:52   #
Joecosentino Loc: Whitesboro, New York
 
parks333 wrote:
I totally agree with Joe. When I read entries that reduce the D600 complaints as merely over exaggerated whining I can only conclude that these people are working for Nikon... Just kidding. The D600 issues are real. I have continued to monitor this issue because I would love to once again own the d600. My hope is that the new production line will be different.


It's a great camera otherwise, the photos are fantastic, just full of spots mostly upper left so it should be dust (shutter fragments) fallining into the right lower corner of the sensor.

My last one I talk with the dealer and I did the 3000'shots to see if it clears up and it did not.

I am now just watching and waiting there is rumor of a D4 sensor going into a d800 body, that might make an interesting camera. I have rented the D4 too just to try it out its big

So we can just wait to see what happens I hope to get a 600 this spring sometime

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 16:49:14   #
Joecosentino Loc: Whitesboro, New York
 
eplain wrote:
DaveHam wrote:
Wonderful how every time a D600 or a D800 is mentioned in the forum the immediate feedback is about perceived problems. Lots of people claiming problems which when looked at were rather the user and not the camera. The D600 oil issue, now expanded to cover every speck of dust bad handling allows into the body has not been an issue for a long time. The D800 had a very small number of units with a focus issue; again this is past history. No one should be put off these cameras. The D800 is in many areas probably the best FX DSLR available today. Seeing the usual exaggeration of the situation I am surprised anyone on the forum would ever buy these cameras.
Wonderful how every time a D600 or a D800 is menti... (show quote)


Uncalled for my friend.
I didn't want to upset anyone, but the people who have good 600's are talking like we don't know what we are doing. Trust me this issue isn't just a couple of dust spots.

The comments I (and he) made we mild (very mild). And I stated the reason I didnt get the 800 was financial.

No one here blamed the very few "issues" for their photographic failures.

Where did THIS come from?
quote=DaveHam Wonderful how every time a D600 or ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jan 10, 2013 16:55:23   #
trc Loc: Logan, OH
 
GoofieNewfie, eplain, lightchime, and all others,

I debated even making a comment during this thread, but finally decided to do so and will eventually get to my main point towards the end.

I guess I am not really into the back & forth conversation/opinions contesting the good and bad about various products. I say this without any disgust meant, whatsoever, to all the UHH members. If there is a real issue with an item, I'm more than glad to hear about it and respect other UHH members valid input, warnings, and concerns. I also greatly value and appreciate professional's, amateur's, and hobbyist's input about the mechanics involved in achieving a 'better shot,' since I am constantly trying to improve my photographic skills. I'm not as young as probably a lot of some UHH members; but not quite as old as others, either. I do like learning (and have learned a lot) from others, and value everyone's comments.

I don't want to jinx myself, but own a D800 which I finally received about August 6, 2011, after waiting for 5 full months, and have only had one minor issue. After talking to a Pro on UHH, I followed his advice and just let it 'slide,' and after about two weeks or so, it disappeared. Perhaps I got lucky - who really knows . . .

I can honestly understand one's discontent paying thousand's of dollars for a product and then having problems. That becomes an issue for the manufacturer to resolve and work out with the consumer. Like most UHH members, I'm not made of money, so expense is an issue all the time.

Now, I'm finally going to state what I set out to 'add' to the focusing issue for the D800. Just by chance, I have become acquainted with an UHH member who told me during a phone conversation how to set up back focusing on the D800. I obviously think it is such a slick way to focus on a subject/object and then recompose the shot, and shoot, never having to refocus again until moving on to a different subject of interest. The focusing is easy, accurate, and sharp. Maybe I'm still excited about it since I never knew this was possible (trying to learn as much as I can as quickly as I can). The more experienced and professional photographers might merely laugh at my excitement, but that's OK, too.

I might end by saying that, honestly, it truly is unfortunate that some people have experienced focusing problems with the D800 or other Nikon or other manufacturer's camera models. As a consumer, I also feel like the manufacturer should test and retest their new products beyond any reasonable doubt for optimum performance, but we all regrettably know new products slowly start to wear out as soon as they are taken out of their new packaging - that's just a fact of life.

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 17:22:32   #
eplain
 
To set the record straight? I was kidding! about my initial comment on the flaws on the 800. making fun of the 600 oil complaint.

i bought a 600 AFTER all the jazz and crying came out.

id LOVE an 800...as i said.

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 23:27:24   #
trc Loc: Logan, OH
 
eplain wrote:
To set the record straight? I was kidding! about my initial comment on the flaws on the 800. making fun of the 600 oil complaint.

i bought a 600 AFTER all the jazz and crying came out.

id LOVE an 800...as i said.


I hope you come up with the necessary money so you are able to get yourself a D800. I bought the one I have basically taking out a loan to get it. I'm very glad I did with no regrets. :-) I'm even happier since it is completely paid for, now!

Honestly, I think all this discussion is basically nonsense and quite amusing. I never got serious about any of what was said and was basically reading and 'listening' to what people had to say. :) I never take people's personal comments very seriously at all. I figure a lot of time they are either just 'venting' or instigating to see if they can get a rise out of other UHH members. Very, very rarely do I ever get into discussions like this since it's just a waist of time, and, time is not something I have a lot of, especially for amusing ventures like this became for a while. :)

Hope all is well with everyone - I'm going to bed and get a good night's rest. Have a great day tomorrow and happy shooting to all. :thumbup:

Reply
Jan 11, 2013 04:52:34   #
eplain
 
trc wrote:
I hope you come up with the necessary money so you are able to get yourself a D800. I bought the one I have basically taking out a loan to get it. I'm very glad I did with no regrets.


Well.... its not about having the money, its about justifying the purchase...for me...personally.

I am not a Pro photographer, if i were, the 800 (and better) would be in my hands tomorrow.

It's just that i know that a better camera does not make you take better pictures. I know people with d800's whose work can't compare to photos i took with my d90....or even my Pentax K-1000 for that matter.

So when I got a shot at a D600 for $800 vs. a D800 for $3000, right now, it was a "No Brainer"...for ME!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.