Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Why card readers?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 11 next> last>>
Feb 2, 2024 18:15:45   #
therwol Loc: USA
 
BebuLamar wrote:
One extra step. You have to unlock your phone and click on the allow to allow the PC to access it.


Not every time, just the first time you transfer files from a phone to a particular computer.

Reply
Feb 2, 2024 18:18:10   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
BebuLamar wrote:
One extra step. You have to unlock your phone and click on the allow to allow the PC to access it.

Deal breaker?????

(Not if the phone is not locked...)

Reply
Feb 2, 2024 19:22:10   #
CamB Loc: Juneau, Alaska
 
Ioannis wrote:
An old subject with many preferences from each one of the readers. I find the usb cable more reliable in my opinion , opening the camera door and taking the card out it could very easily be scratched, and then replace it back in the camera, those are few steps more than plugging the cable into the camera. Some saying something about running the battery low, this could happen as we taking photos. My usb cable is always plugged into to my computer, not a big deal!


I didn't know scratching a card was a thing or even possible. Never heard of it happening or even how you would do it.

Reply
 
 
Feb 2, 2024 19:32:51   #
CamB Loc: Juneau, Alaska
 
Longshadow wrote:
I don't mind, and I won't have an iPhone.....


I'm just curious. Do non Apple phones automaticly sync with computers if they are looking at the same online storage? I've just assumed every phone on the same account or network would auto sync something like Photos without having to do anything once the system is set up. Don't calendars and contacts talk back and forth between devices? Mine do. Wouldn't photos be the same?
Not trying to make a point here, just wondering.

Reply
Feb 2, 2024 19:40:29   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
CamB wrote:
I'm just curious. Do non Apple phones automaticly sync with computers if they are looking at the same online storage? I've just assumed every phone on the same account or network would auto sync something like Photos without having to do anything once the system is set up. Don't calendars and contacts talk back and forth between devices? Mine do. Wouldn't photos be the same?
Not trying to make a point here, just wondering.

I don't know, I don't have my phone syncing with anything.
Reason being, I deleted some images on my phone, and the SYNC put them back on the phone!!!
I turned syncing off.....

Reply
Feb 2, 2024 21:21:20   #
OldCADuser Loc: Irvine, CA
 
I use both, depending on where I'm at when downloading my images.

I use a MacBook M1 Pro laptop, but when I'm at home, working in my office, it's part of a complete 'docking' set-up, connected via a 'brick' to a large monitor, external drives, printers, scanners, CD/DVD player, etc. When I need to transfer images from a camera, I use a USB cable connected to an external terminal block connected to the 'brick'. However, when I'm on the road and using the MacBook Pro as an actual laptop, I take the SD card out of the camera and use the MacBook's builtin card reader. Yea, I could use a cable, but then that's just one more thing to keep track of (at home, it's no big deal as I have a desk drawer for stuff like that).

Reply
Feb 2, 2024 22:06:02   #
User ID
 
gvarner wrote:
Why would anyone use a card reader when there are more direct ways to load photos onto a computer, like using a USB cable?

Convenience.

Reply
 
 
Feb 2, 2024 22:08:17   #
User ID
 
Timmers wrote:
Why? Because there is a card reader built into the front of the computer. So the computer is a "card reader" itself, and the computer recognizes the card being inserted. Then the compute has opened the card to be read. You are suppose to remove all the images and place them into the file you create to download to that file. You can then deleat the content of the card to clear it for the next use, AFTER confirming the file has the downloaded images. This of course becomes the master file for those images. Any action to ANY iage is then done on a copy folder of all the images. It is called the protocol for image management. Tat first folders is ALWAYS marked MASTER, the copy folder is called WORK. In this manner you don't end up with any failed images or files.

In addition to all this EVERY FOLDER receives two (2) designations, first the date day, month, year 022324 ( second month, the day and then the year 24), the second identifier that can be used to search is perhaps the person's name, location, ect. so a search of thousands of files can be located easily.

Final, and without fail, the MASTER folder is up loaded to your external memory and then secured. All this before you begin to play with your images in the WORK folder.
Why? Because there is a card reader built into the... (show quote)

It doesnt read my latest cards.

Reply
Feb 2, 2024 22:14:32   #
User ID
 
Longshadow wrote:
Interesting. When I use dates I use YYYYMMDD, that way they are listed by year, then month, then day.
Otherwise all the Februaries (months) are grouped together, then days, then years.

The other (aka "normal") way all your pix are grouped by similar weather and yearly events and holidays. If you want them displayed in a continuous chronological order set your PC to sort by time of creation.

Reply
Feb 2, 2024 22:22:34   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
User ID wrote:
The other (aka "normal") way all your pix are grouped by similar weather and yearly events and holidays. If you want them displayed in a continuous chronological order set your PC to sort by time of creation.

I could, but I won't.
BUT, I'll bet that there is someone out there that would.

People love to group, sub-group, and sub-sub-group, and, ...
Humans are strange, they love ro group and categorize.

Reply
Feb 2, 2024 22:32:03   #
CamB Loc: Juneau, Alaska
 
Longshadow wrote:
I could, but I won't.
BUT, I'll bet that there is someone out there that would.

People love to group, sub-group, and sub-sub-group, and, ...
Humans are strange, they love ro group and categorize.


Thats me! I love all my groups and sub-groups. Vacations by Location and date but lots of Keywords. I don't really care about the date on most of the things I shoot. It's always there in the metadata anyway.

Reply
 
 
Feb 3, 2024 02:48:25   #
whatdat Loc: Del Valle, Tx.
 
Longshadow wrote:
I don't have to dig out the cable and make sure the camera has a sufficient charge in the battery for the duration of the process.
Less than 10 seconds to remove the card and insert it into the reader.

I use a card reader all the time.


👍👍👍

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 03:37:04   #
gwilliams6
 
gvarner wrote:
Why would anyone use a card reader when there are more direct ways to load photos onto a computer, like using a USB cable?


You cant use your camera to take photos while downloading with a USB cable, and there is less wear and tear on your camera's USB port if you use a separate card reader. USB ports do wear and go bad with constant prolonged use, it has happened.

And as a pro, often after shooting live events, i need to hand my cards to media representatives for their purposes while I continue shooting with different cards, not stopping to waste time with downloading by USB cable and missing important shots.

Also the fastest card readers can handle photo transfers faster than your camera in many instances.

Cheers

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 05:16:47   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
gwilliams6 wrote:
You cant use your camera to take photos while downloading with a USB cable, and there is less wear and tear on your camera's USB port if you use a separate card reader. USB ports do wear and go bad with constant prolonged use, it has happened.

I can attest to that.

The USB cable socket on my Z7 degraded after prolonged use so I switched to a card reader. It's so much faster that it easily makes up for the time it takes to move the card back and forth between the camera and the reader.

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 05:19:16   #
cmc4214 Loc: S.W. Pennsylvania
 
Longshadow wrote:
I don't have to dig out the cable and make sure the camera has a sufficient charge in the battery for the duration of the process.
Less than 10 seconds to remove the card and insert it into the reader.

I use a card reader all the time.


Me, too!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.