I predict the Supreme Court will overturn the Colorado decision to remove Trump from the 2024 b****t.
Mar 4, 2024 12:31:42 #
LinksUp wrote:
There it is. Just like I predicated. The SC b una... (show quote)
Our liberal Hogger friends heads must be exploding right now. Especially since the liberal justices v**ed for Trump.
Mar 4, 2024 12:33:40 #
Kraken wrote:
The Sc had no choice, if it had gone the other way there
would have been r**ting and l**ting in the streets of every city.
would have been r**ting and l**ting in the streets of every city.
Good time for the B*M gang.
Mar 4, 2024 12:42:01 #
papakatz45 wrote:
Our liberal Hogger friends heads must be exploding right now. Especially since the liberal justices v**ed for Trump.
SCOTUS ruled as I predicted in a different thread - no heads exploding over here. They did not v**e for Trump---they v**ed against Colorado and followed how they interpreted the amendment. They contend that it's Congress's job to enforce that amendment.
Mar 4, 2024 12:51:34 #
Triple G wrote:
SCOTUS ruled as I predicted - no heads exploding over here. They did not v**e for Trump---they v**ed against Colorado and followed how they interpreted the amendment. They contend that it's Congress's job to enforce that amendment.
Trump is speaking on TV right now, the longer he speaks the more v**es he is losing.
Keep talking Donkey Don, what a bonehead. He is still making a fool of himself when
the newsroom finally cut him off.
Mar 4, 2024 12:52:26 #
Kraken wrote:
Trump is speaking on TV right now, the longer he speaks the more v**es he is losing.
Keep talking Donkey Don, what a bonehead. He is still making a fool of himself when
the newsroom finally cut him off.
Keep talking Donkey Don, what a bonehead. He is still making a fool of himself when
the newsroom finally cut him off.
He is such a doofus. He doesn't even know the meaning of the ruling.
Mar 4, 2024 13:18:56 #
LinksUp wrote:
Please re-read the posts above this. What you are ... (show quote)
Primaries are purely state issue , in fact some states don’t even have them.
Mar 4, 2024 13:25:37 #
DennyT wrote:
Primaries are purely state issue , in fact some states don’t even have them.
So because "some" states don't have primaries, the logistics don't exist.
Got it.
Mar 4, 2024 13:40:00 #
Triple G wrote:
SCOTUS ruled as I predicted in a different thread - no heads exploding over here. They did not v**e for Trump---they v**ed against Colorado and followed how they interpreted the amendment. They contend that it's Congress's job to enforce that amendment.
Exactly right. Their only other choice was to say it was purely a state issue but Colorado made it easy by using federal
Law as a basis the action.
Mar 4, 2024 13:53:38 #
Mar 4, 2024 13:53:57 #
So Democraps continually cry that Republicans are a "threat" to democracy. But, as soon as a ruling goes against what they want, they cry destroy the democracy!!
From our favorite unhinged libtard Keith Olbermann, we get:
From our favorite unhinged libtard Keith Olbermann, we get:
Quote:
Emphasis addedThe Supreme Court has betrayed democracy. Its members including Jackson, Kagan and Sotomayor have proved themselves inept at reading comprehension. And collectively the "court" has shown itself to be corrupt and illegitimate.
It must be dissolved.
It must be dissolved.
Mar 4, 2024 13:56:12 #
scooter1
Loc: Yacolt, Wa.
DennyT wrote:
They have three choices.
1. Say trump is eligible
2. Say trump is not eligible
Or
3. Say it is a state decision since primaries have nothing to with federal government or federal law .
In my opinion the correct answer is number 3. For the court to decide. Numbers 2 or 3 would be taking a position on trumps guilt in the i**********n and that decision. And that is still in court .
Either 1 or 2 would be purely political .
Just an opinion
1. Say trump is eligible
2. Say trump is not eligible
Or
3. Say it is a state decision since primaries have nothing to with federal government or federal law .
In my opinion the correct answer is number 3. For the court to decide. Numbers 2 or 3 would be taking a position on trumps guilt in the i**********n and that decision. And that is still in court .
Either 1 or 2 would be purely political .
Just an opinion
You say the primaries have nothing to do with federal government? When v****g for the POTUS, which is a federal position, why would you say it has nothing to do with federal?
Mar 4, 2024 14:00:25 #
National Park wrote:
The Colorado Supreme Court decision finding that T... (show quote)
You are so right, the most partisan, extreme right wing SCOTUS in our lifetime just v**ed 9-0, did 4 Justices just switch parties?
Mar 4, 2024 14:08:16 #
letmedance wrote:
You are so right, the most partisan, extreme right wing SCOTUS in our lifetime just v**ed 9-0, did 4 Justices just switch parties?
They all v**ed for Peace in our Streets.
Mar 4, 2024 14:09:37 #
scooter1
Loc: Yacolt, Wa.
letmedance wrote:
You are so right, the most partisan, extreme right wing SCOTUS in our lifetime just v**ed 9-0, did 4 Justices just switch parties?
Mar 4, 2024 14:11:17 #
scooter1
Loc: Yacolt, Wa.
Triple G wrote:
They all v**ed for Peace in our Streets.
They v**ed justice and you know it. Whom ever thought a state could disqualify a p**********l candidate needs to think again.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.