bkwaters wrote:
So here are the conclusions, expressed above, to the question, "Do you really need a full-frame camera?"
1) It's not the sensor, it's the photographer.
2) It's not the photographer, it's the lighting.
3) In poor lighting one needs a big sensor.
4) And most importantly, upgrading equipment is indicative of a character defect, though, using Boolean logic, not if the lighting is poor.
Did I miss anything?
Practice is cheaper than another new camera.