Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
First Shot
Page <prev 2 of 11 next> last>>
Nov 29, 2022 09:24:31   #
EJMcD
 
lamiaceae wrote:
Yes, or the last shot. So say of 5 to 8 takes of a subject, numbers 1 & 5 or 8 are most often the keepers.


I've never kept such stats but your post is interesting.

Reply
Nov 29, 2022 09:24:52   #
47greyfox Loc: on the edge of the Colorado front range
 
I wish the world (including me) was perfect and “one was done” worked more often than it does. Often, actually, it’s the second shot that’s my keeper. A quick glance at the LCD will reveal some subtle thing, usually an angle or detail I didn’t notice with the first shot that requires a couple more hits. If in a group, I always grab more than I need especially if the dynamic is get the shot and move on.

Reply
Nov 29, 2022 09:25:39   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
A lost and then found item is always in the last place you look.

Reply
 
 
Nov 29, 2022 09:29:47   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
EJMcD wrote:
Many times after taking multiple images of a subject, I often find that my first shot was the best. Does anyone else experience this?

Nope.

Reply
Nov 29, 2022 09:36:48   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
EJMcD wrote:
All so true for portraiture. However, landscapes, still life and other subjects do not blink.


The only times I take burst shots of landscapes are: (1) when I forgot to take my camera off burst mode; (2) when I'm bracketing for HDR.

Reply
Nov 29, 2022 09:41:38   #
mikegreenwald Loc: Illinois
 
EJMcD wrote:
Many times after taking multiple images of a subject, I often find that my first shot was the best. Does anyone else experience this?


Me too, but sometimes the best shot is the HDR, usually with high contrast subjects & landscapes.

Reply
Nov 29, 2022 09:58:28   #
SENSORLOUPE
 
EJMcD wrote:
Many times after taking multiple images of a subject, I often find that my first shot was the best. Does anyone else experience this?


Yes!! Definitely!! I take 5 or 6 of the same, and usually pic the first one!!!!

Reply
 
 
Nov 29, 2022 09:59:33   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
I find my first view of a scene is usually the one I like the best. So "working the scene" actually is a bit of a waste for me. I admit that's not always true, but a high percentage of the time. Which is one reason why I tend to do really quick shooting instead of spending hours (or at least lots of minutes) on a particular scene. I think that individually we get so tuned in to what we like and don't like, that we sort of instinctively do not shoot until we see what we like.

Reply
Nov 29, 2022 11:38:52   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
Sometimes it's my first, sometimes it's my last, but more often than not I'm very glad I didn't stop after the first shot.

Reply
Nov 29, 2022 12:04:52   #
EJMcD
 
It seems I'm not alone. I'm getting more Yeas than Nays. Maybe jerryc41 has something there.

Reply
Nov 29, 2022 12:37:15   #
DougS Loc: Central Arkansas
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
I have had the first shot of a burst turn out well, but it is not something that happens frequently enough to make me avoid bursts.

I used to shoot events for PR for an organization I belonged to. There were frequently shots of someone at a podium, speaking. There were two guys, high up in the organization, so they were frequent subjects, who would contort their faces into the most amazing expressions while speaking. Their face could do that in the few milliseconds between deciding to take the shot and the shutter opening. The ONLY way to get a good shot of either of these guys was spray and pray. Many times I would take 3-5 shot bursts, winding up with 50-100 shots to choose from.

Another thing I encountered was when doing group shots with flash. Many times I would encounter a blinker. There are two kinds of blinkers: most frequently someone will blink in response to the preflash and their eyes are closed when the shot happens. Another kind has a delayed response, so they will blink after the shot. The first kind is addressed by raising the ISO to the point where it doesn't affect the IQ too much but allows the flash to loaf so it doesn't dump all the charge in one flash. Then you can use a high speed burst and get 3-4 shots of the group on a single charge. The first kind of blinker usually recovers by the third shot and you can get their eyes open. If you have both kinds of blinkers in a group, it's tough to get everyone with their eyes open in one burst. If that happens, the only remedies I have are (1) take longer bursts; (2) swap heads in Photoshop. Since you took a fast burst the background doesn't change much so it's really easy to swap heads without worrying much about the background changing.

Sometimes multiple shots are necessary.

This is digital. The shots are essentially free. The cost of a shot is (1) amortization of the capital costs of the equipment (so the more you use it, the less the shots cost); (2) your time in selecting the shots. The second cost is the most important one. However, multiple shots provide some insurance for those shots that are nonrepeatable.
I have had the first shot of a burst turn out well... (show quote)


Try the technique of having EVERYONE in the photo shoot to close their eyes, "on count of 3 everyone open your eyes"... snap!

Reply
 
 
Nov 29, 2022 13:02:11   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
DougS wrote:
Try the technique of having EVERYONE in the photo shoot to close their eyes, "on count of 3 everyone open your eyes"... snap!


I do that! It works.

Reply
Nov 29, 2022 14:07:04   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
I do not think you folks realize that the first shot should be used as a Polaroid.

If you are a true adept of photography, you would know that the first capture exposes (1) everything that is incorrect in the scene. The following shots are made consequently and reviewed with a critical eye in order to adjust details that might be minor but are issues that need to be fixed before going to the lab (PP).

Burst shooting is a joke unless you are shooting an object moving at a high velocity or is ephemeral in nature.

Reply
Nov 29, 2022 15:01:56   #
EJMcD
 
Rongnongno wrote:
I do not think you folks realize that the first shot should be used as a Polaroid.

If you are a true adept of photography, you would know that the first capture exposes (1) everything that is incorrect in the scene. The following shots are made consequently and reviewed with a critical eye in order to adjust details that might be minor but are issues that need to be fixed before going to the lab (PP).

Burst shooting is a joke unless you are shooting an object moving at a high velocity or is ephemeral in nature.
I do not think you folks realize that the first sh... (show quote)


Whatever works for YOU (or anyone else) is fine with me. I don't see the need to negatively criticize the methods of others. Your original reply to my question was sufficient but thanks anyway for posting. Keep honing your skills and you too may find that your first shot was the best.

Reply
Nov 29, 2022 17:06:24   #
User ID
 
EJMcD wrote:
Many times after taking multiple images of a subject, I often find that my first shot was the best. Does anyone else experience this?

Random. No strong leaning to first shots. Occasionally "yes" but no real trend.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.