Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
“Classified” or Not!
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Aug 24, 2022 12:34:42   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
All the documents that Trump possessed at his unsecured residence, “classified” or not, belonged to the American people.
Trump’s selfish disregard for Title 18, 2071, goes beyond belief. He is a thief, and a stupid one at that.
The FBI did their jobs, in attempting to retrieve this stolen property for months, and then taking legal steps to retrieve what was stolen, to protect the interests of National Security.
If a stolen property is found in a personal residence, the owner is arrested and charged with a crime. He or she is not given the opportunity to simply return the stolen stuff without consequences.
No man is above the law—Trump must be indicted to preserve the rule of law in this fading Republic.
All the documents that Trump possessed at his unse... (show quote)


No one is below the law either. Why was the warrant so broad as to violate the 4th amendment?

Reply
Aug 24, 2022 12:37:38   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
Fotoartist wrote:
No one is below the law either. Why was the warrant so broad as to violate the 4th amendment?


Seems the judge who approved the warrant disagrees with you. I will take his expertise over yours.

Reply
Aug 24, 2022 12:51:34   #
Triple G
 
Fotoartist wrote:
No one is below the law either. Why was the warrant so broad as to violate the 4th amendment?


Assumes evidence of violation of 4th amendment. What do you claim that to be?

Reply
 
 
Aug 24, 2022 12:51:48   #
Triple G
 
JohnFrim wrote:
Seems the judge who approved the warrant disagrees with you. I will take his expertise over yours.


Me, too!

Reply
Aug 24, 2022 15:18:36   #
BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere
 
Fotoartist wrote:
No one is below the law either. Why was the warrant so broad as to violate the 4th amendment?


The Fourth Amendment mandates that searching a person's home is only legal when it is "reasonable." A court-approved search warrant, which was issued before the Mar-a-Lago raid, must be justified by "probable cause" that is "supported by oath or affirmation," including details of the area being searched and the items being searched for.

From what YOU know or what other armchair politicians in the Attic know, outside of reading what Chump says about it, what do you have to show a 4th amendment violation?

Reply
Aug 24, 2022 15:30:17   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
BooIsMyCat wrote:
The Fourth Amendment mandates that searching a person's home is only legal when it is "reasonable." A court-approved search warrant, which was issued before the Mar-a-Lago raid, must be justified by "probable cause" that is "supported by oath or affirmation," including details of the area being searched and the items being searched for.

From what YOU know or what other armchair politicians in the Attic know, outside of reading what Chump says about it, what do you have to show a 4th amendment violation?
The Fourth Amendment mandates that searching a per... (show quote)


Both of you brainiacs failed to read the Amendment to the end...."and PARTICULARLY describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Show me the Particulars!

Reply
Aug 24, 2022 15:43:03   #
mwalsh Loc: Houston
 
Fotoartist wrote:
Both of you brainiacs failed to read the Amendment to the end...."and PARTICULARLY describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Show me the Particulars!


Yer such a great caricature

Reply
 
 
Aug 24, 2022 15:52:05   #
BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere
 
Fotoartist wrote:
Both of you brainiacs failed to read the Amendment to the end...."and PARTICULARLY describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Show me the Particulars!


You're the one crying foul.

Only "particulars" I have is that you are a way far-right extremist chump monkey.

Reply
Aug 24, 2022 22:23:13   #
scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.
 
btbg wrote:
Well, on that basis Hillary is guilty as sin since she had classified documents on a server at her home, yet you continue to support her. What a hypocrite. It should also be pointed out that all recent presidents have their own papers in their own library. Obama has something like 30 million documents in Chicago. So, perhaps you are not fully understanding the law you are citing.


Well put. If 9volt were to be believed no other president has taken out anything from their time in office. But that seems to be the way of democrats now. Hypocrites!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.