Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
A******n
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
Jul 3, 2022 15:43:45   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
kymarto wrote:
Thank you. Quite cogent and aware. The opposite of an empty mind.


Coming from you, that comment is much appreciated.

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 15:48:08   #
travelwp Loc: New Jersey
 
kymarto wrote:
Let's see how well that works before patting ourselves on the back.


I agree, when big government 'fixes' a problem the result is usually worse.

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 15:51:19   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
kymarto wrote:
Let's see how well that works before patting ourselves on the back. I just read about a ten year old pregnant rape victim who had to travel out of state to terminate her pregnancy. Most of the rest of the world cannot believe what is happening in the States


Most of the rest of the world think America has gone crazy—I agree. So many changes in young peoples lives, in the workforce, so many lawsuits and legal matters, never before imagined.
Will fertilization doctors be arrested for murder when they destroy unwanted duplicate embryos? So many ramifications of a decision based on a religious belief held by a minority.
It cannot be simplified except by simple minds, despite the OP’s thoughtlessness.

Reply
 
 
Jul 3, 2022 16:01:29   #
travelwp Loc: New Jersey
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
So many ramifications of a decision based on a religious belief held by a minority.


Not always a religious belief: In many states, if you murder a pregnant woman it is a DOUBLE HOMICIDE.

Based on a a 'MINORITY': L**TS is a true minority, but it garners headlines every day?

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 08:28:56   #
Watash
 
kymarto wrote:
A few companies have said so, but what about the women and girls who don't work for those companies, who often live paycheck to paycheck? They need t***sportation and lodging costs, and for those working it also entails loss of income.


Have these people never heard of Condoms and/or birth control pills?

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 08:38:08   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
Watosh wrote:
Have these people never heard of Condoms and/or birth control pills?


What do you have to say to those using birth control who get pregnant anyway? Tough s**t?

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 08:58:27   #
davidrb Loc: Half way there on the 45th Parallel
 
kymarto wrote:
A few companies have said so, but what about the women and girls who don't work for those companies, who often live paycheck to paycheck? They need t***sportation and lodging costs, and for those working it also entails loss of income.


I have known many women who fit your conditions. None of them ever placed themselves in position to need or want an a******n. You are categorizing ALL women in the same breathe as those with little or no self responsibility. By completely removing that responsibility you are complicit to the failures the Democratic Party and their t*****rous refusal to accept consequences for their actions. Democrats have forsaken all semblance of responsibility for their own actions. The Speaker of the House of Representatives vilifies her political opponents for advocating personal responsibility. She then publicly displays her lack of same. HER mother obviously had an entirely different philosophy. We now suffer for her mother's high morals.

Reply
 
 
Jul 4, 2022 09:02:22   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
travelwp wrote:
A******n.


The Supreme Court has ruled that the state, not the Federal Government should rule over a******ns.

Companies have said that they would pay for t***sportation should a woman have to travel to another state.

So why all the protests ?



There is a lot more to the decision.
It reasserts states rights over more than a******n which the libs h**e.
Also the libs were fighting to federally force those opposed to a******n to pay for it through taxes. This shoots down that agenda. A******n is actually a small portion of the implications of this decision.

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 09:05:55   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
davidrb wrote:
I have known many women who fit your conditions. None of them ever placed themselves in position to need or want an a******n. You are categorizing ALL women in the same breathe as those with little or no self responsibility. By completely removing that responsibility you are complicit to the failures the Democratic Party and their t*****rous refusal to accept consequences for their actions. Democrats have forsaken all semblance of responsibility for their own actions. The Speaker of the House of Representatives vilifies her political opponents for advocating personal responsibility. She then publicly displays her lack of same. HER mother obviously had an entirely different philosophy. We now suffer for her mother's high morals.
I have known many women who fit your conditions. ... (show quote)


It sounds like you think Democrats are the only women ever to want or need an a******n.

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 09:06:44   #
pendennis
 
travelwp wrote:
Big government to the rescue:

Health and Human Services Sec. Xavier Becerra revealed that the federal government is exploring a range of options to support the ability to get an a******n, including possible access across state lines for women traveling out of state to seek the procedure.


He will have trouble doing that. The Hyde Amendment prohibits expenditures of Federal funds for a******n, except in rare cases. I would imagine that his actions will end up in Federal courts before the ink is dry on his decision.

Odd, how the Liberals in government are always "exploring a range of options", when the Supreme Court decision removes any authority from the Federal government and remands it back to the states.

Of course, it's not his money that will be spent defending such crap in the court.

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 09:22:29   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
pendennis wrote:
He will have trouble doing that. The Hyde Amendment prohibits expenditures of Federal funds for a******n, except in rare cases. I would imagine that his actions will end up in Federal courts before the ink is dry on his decision.

Odd, how the Liberals in government are always "exploring a range of options", when the Supreme Court decision removes any authority from the Federal government and remands it back to the states.

Of course, it's not his money that will be spent defending such crap in the court.
He will have trouble doing that. The Hyde Amendme... (show quote)


The Hyde amendment is not worth the paper it is written on as far as democrats are concerned.
They would have declared a******n being federally funded a constitutional right thus nullifying Hyde.

Reply
 
 
Jul 4, 2022 09:44:53   #
FrumCA
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
Hatred. A strong word, not to be used recklessly.
This much is true: I H**E what Trump did—he tried in every way possible, illegal or not, to dismiss the Will of the e*****rate in an attempt to change America into a third world country, by overturning a f**r e******n in a what was no more than a illegal, un-American, self-serving power grab. He incited an armed i**********n, against our country to breech the Capitol, to disrupt Constitutional process of certifying the duly elected President. And what is worse, he frantically wanted to join the i**********nists playing Braveheart.on the Capitol steps. That is not acceptable to me as an American. He attempted to convince our Justice Department, and our VP, to dismiss their oaths of office, for his claim to undeserved power.
And what I also H**E is that otherwise good Americans think Trump’s c**p attempt was not an affront to democracy, and still think this man is well-intentioned. Trump is a con man, a self-serving, power hungry, autocrat wanna-be, who crapped on the American e*******l process, the bedrock of our democracy.
So yes, I do feel a bit of hatred.
Hatred. A strong word, not to be used recklessly.... (show quote)

Ah hah. Resort to deflection and the but, but, but Trump defense when there’s no answer to the subject at hand.

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 09:47:18   #
DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods
 
pendennis wrote:
He will have trouble doing that. The Hyde Amendment prohibits expenditures of Federal funds for a******n, except in rare cases. I would imagine that his actions will end up in Federal courts before the ink is dry on his decision.

Odd, how the Liberals in government are always "exploring a range of options", when the Supreme Court decision removes any authority from the Federal government and remands it back to the states.

Of course, it's not his money that will be spent defending such crap in the court.
He will have trouble doing that. The Hyde Amendme... (show quote)


Certainly the Hyde amendment prohibits federal funding for an a******n. Not sure he meant that.
But
If, sone states have proposed/duscusssd, passing laws prohibiting their citizens from traveling to other states for a******n- that directly lead to more federal involvement as it would put the issue In interstate commerce clause of the constitution.

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 09:55:46   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
DennyT wrote:
Certainly the Hyde amendment prohibits federal funding for an a******n. Not sure he meant that.
But
If, sone states have proposed/duscusssd, passing laws prohibiting their citizens from traveling to other states for a******n- that directly lead to more federal involvement as it would put the issue In interstate commerce clause of the constitution.


States will never prohibit someone traveling to another state for an a******n.
That is moronic fear mongering by the libs to democrat i***ts.
1 how do they know someone is pregnant?
2 how do they know your travel plans?
3 how do they know what your destination is?
4 how do they know what you are doing?
Libs fall for any stupid thing put out by the DNC.
Good examples are Russia h**x and 1*6 h**x.
Sorry I forgot. Those 4 items will be known as most pukes today Instagram, FB, Twitter etc. Everything including their hourly bowel movements.

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 10:11:14   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
Your oversimplification of the ramifications of overturning Roe says much about you. No more need be said about your thinking processes and the personal world where you live.


Your under thinking about the overturning of Roe v. Wade underscores your lack of depth. For 200 years before Roe came along a******n was outlawed everywhere. Now since Roe was overturned, is a******n back to being illegal everywhere?

Deeper thinking of the matter would conclude as the Supreme Court did that the Constitution applies only to individuals who are actually born.

Hence, SCOTUS' reasoning was that they could not make a Constitutional judgement and ruling on the issue of the unborn and sent the matter to the states and the people to decide who had that prerogative before Roe came along.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.