I've had a theory for a while that Canon will create new mirrorless product tiers based on including this feature. With this morning's R7 / R10 announcements, we see maybe this theory in practice. In the upper tier EOS R7 (mirrorless evolution of the EOS 7D-series bodies), we see 32MP, 15 fps mechanical and 30 fps electronic, 2 card slots, and all the technology and weather resistance features of a premier sports / wildlife body with a cropped sensor.
In the EOS R10, we see a lot of advanced technology, including: 24MP, 15 fps mechanical and 23 fps electronic, 1 card slots, Eye-tracking AF. But, in this lighter weight and lower-priced modern technology marvel, we see the IBIS missing along with the mirror.
We saw something similar in Nikon's mirrorless cropped Z50, and the Z fc too. Use IS / VR lenses and you won't miss the camera's missing IBIS. But, if you're looking to consolidate all your lenses, including the legacy lenses back to the film-era, onto a single digital platform, this missing IBIS may remove some of the camera models from consideration.
These cameras from Canon and Nikon differ from Sony's approach where IBIS is a standard feature in all the mirrorless bodies, cropped and full-frame.
I'd like to see more standardization. If IBIS is good, put it in all cameras. All cameras have autofocus now. I hate it when companies leave features out or add features just to play with prices. Sure, you can add special features to high end cameras, but if there is a standard feature that will benefit everyone, it should be in all cameras. Of course, then they would have to decide how to make the high end cameras better, but more MP and fps should cover that. And while we're at it, let's stop making crop sensor bodies. In SLR days, we didn't have 35mm cameras and 23mm cameras.
jerryc41 wrote:
I'd like to see more standardization. If IBIS is good, put it in all cameras. All cameras have autofocus now. I hate it when companies leave features out or add features just to play with prices. Sure, you can add special features to high end cameras, but if there is a standard feature that will benefit everyone, it should be in all cameras. Of course, then they would have to decide how to make the high end cameras better, but more MP and fps should cover that. And while we're at it, let's stop making crop sensor bodies. In SLR days, we didn't have 35mm cameras and 23mm cameras.
I'd like to see more standardization. If IBIS is ... (
show quote)
I thought cropped sensors were done along with mirrors. Oddly no.
So these are BOTH cropped sensors ?? What is the best guess for actually SEEING these to BUY ???
.
imagemeister wrote:
So these are BOTH cropped sensors ?? What is the best guess for actually SEEING these to BUY ???
.
In 5 months they'll represent 64.1% of the US market for cropped sensor cameras in the 2nd half of the calendar year ...
CHG_CANON wrote:
I thought cropped sensors were done along with mirrors. Oddly no.
I thought so too but then Nikon introduced the Z50 and now Canon with the R7 and R10.
Maybe the bigger question is what lens mount will they have ??
imagemeister wrote:
Maybe the bigger question is what lens mount will they have ??
Question?? Isn't it obvious that they have RF mount?
BebuLamar wrote:
Question?? Isn't it obvious that they have RF mount?
Not to ME ....that may be too logical too simple for Canon - think about earlier Canon APSC mirror less swarais !
.
I’m at lost,what’s IBIS stand for ,sorry i have to ask
Fotoserj wrote:
I’m at lost,what’s IBIS stand for ,sorry i have to ask
In Body Image Stabilization
I recall seeing a transcript of a video from a Canon exec a few years ago who opined that the IBIS (In Body Image Stabilization) was unnecessary in that it was avail on their lenses. I thought it was short sighted then. Of course, they found religion and started putting it in their cameras. The IBIS feature is so beneficial, I have no idea how a camera, these days, could be sold without it. I am a huge fan of Canon and Nikon, but gotta say, as an Oly shooter knowledgeable about all its unique features, 'twer I a developer of cameras I would really look at the features in Olympus cameras and try to mimic that in my line...Canon or Nikon. Highly water resistant, amazing IBIS, live composite, in body focus stacking, high res shooting, onboard ND filter (a bit gimmicky but still...), updates on software and a host of others. As someone once famously said, the system changes how one looks at life!
When some newbie asks about getting into a system, I almost always point them to Canon, but I wonder about their odd decision to not include IBIS in all cameras. In fact, I just bought a small Canon kit for a relative. I would think that most casual shooters just want to buy a camera, assume it has the major features, such as IBIS, built in and not have to do a spread sheet on the features of cameras to protect themselves from omissions.
Certainly, people will continue to buy the Canon line. And they probably will own the majority of the market with these new models, but I am flummoxed as to why.
imagemeister wrote:
Not to ME ....that may be too logical too simple for Canon - think about earlier Canon APSC mirror less swarais !
.
Well they are EOS-R (not M)
BebuLamar wrote:
Well they are EOS-R (not M)
Yes, one has to wonder and ASK ....
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.