Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Anyone want to speculate on Nikon's D850's future?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 9 next> last>>
May 6, 2022 12:12:30   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
mwsilvers wrote:


Unless you consider a camera as just a box with a sensor on one end and a hole for a lens on the other end, the Z7 is quite a ways short of being a mirrorless D850.

Reply
May 6, 2022 12:19:28   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
larryepage wrote:
No. Actually it's not. The Z7 is a completely different camera to use. In fact, it was called "80% of a D850" when it was introduced. It does not have the professional operating system of the D850 (which traces at least back to the D200), and also has a few other significant shortcomings.

That's why many of us have said (and continue to say) that we will wait for the Z8, or whatever it ends up being called. And the answer is not the Z9. We're not looking for something at twice the price. Absent that answer, my D850 will serve perfectly for a long, long time.
No. Actually it's not. The Z7 is a completely dif... (show quote)


While the Z7II doesn't do some things as well as the D850, in other ways it is superior. Additionally, it is smaller and lighter, and the Z lenses are smaller and lighter, and often sharper, then their F mount counterparts.

For those not already invested in the D850 or the Z7II the decision to purchase one over the other will depend on a number of factors which should be investigated in advance before making a purchase decision.

A mirrorless camera provides a different shooting experience than a DSLR. Most people seem to prefer that experience, but many long term DSLR users do not. However, eventually it will be moot. All DSLRs will go the way of the dodo at some point in the not too distant future and the number of lenses produced for that older technology will continue to diminish. In addition, as mirrorless technology continues to improve, any current advantages of the D850 will likely disappear.

Reply
May 6, 2022 12:32:27   #
therwol Loc: USA
 
mwsilvers wrote:
While the Z7II doesn't do some things as well as the D850, in other ways it is superior.


D850 wins for tracking moving objects and also for full compatibility with Nikon's older AF screw drive lenses. Z7II wins for having IBIS and a viewfinder when taking video. Someone might prefer the EVF of the Z7II over the optical viewfinder on the D850 or vice versa. What's important to you?

I think that someone starting out should consider mirrorless first, but it isn't a slam dunk until the best features of the Z9 trickle down into lower priced (and smaller/lighter) cameras. Again, one of the purposes of posting this question was to make people aware of the sale going on right now where you can get a USA model D850 for $500 off the usual price. I think the sale ends on May 8.

Reply
 
 
May 6, 2022 12:51:13   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
mwsilvers wrote:
While the Z7II doesn't do some things as well as the D850, in other ways it is superior. Additionally, it is smaller and lighter, and the Z lenses are smaller and lighter, and often sharper, then their F mount counterparts.

For those not already invested in the D850 or the Z7II the decision to purchase one over the other will depend on a number of factors which should be investigated in advance before making a purchase decision.

A mirrorless camera provides a different shooting experience than a DSLR. Most people seem to prefer that experience, but many long term DSLR users do not. However, eventually it will be moot. All DSLRs will go the way of the dodo at some point in the not too distant future and the number of lenses produced for that older technology will continue to diminish. In addition, as mirrorless technology continues to improve, any current advantages of the D850 will likely disappear.
While the Z7II doesn't do some things as well as t... (show quote)


I recognize the two different experiences. And I understand them. As an experienced photographer who knows how to make a camera work, I found that I could be making equivalent photographs with a Z7 after about 10-15 minutes of familiarization. But I found no pixie dust or anything else on or inside the camera that said I was going to be making superior images anytime soon. (There was still none after a couple of days.)

I also vigorously believe that people should make their own choices. I further believe that those who build their lives around raw files really have no reason to have much of a preference. Most of them are just looking for a way to stick a lens in front of a sensor and have some way to control exposure...they are generally (although not always) disinterested in knowing or learning the craft and technique of using a camera.

I do not believe that all DSLRs will go the way of the dodo in the near future. If they do, I expect that the mirrorless cameras will go right alongside them. It is clear that the intent of the mirrorless cameras was to attract a new, younger market. That's not happening. The young folks that show up to learn photography here at school either use the school's cameras, which are all DSLRs (can't get an order for the new mirrorless and lenses through purchasing, because of the higher prices), or else are their parents' retired entry-level DSLRs, generally from two or three generations ago.

Right now, the forecast is that when we are all dead, the game will be over. The generation behind us (and ahead of the kids) is not buying the new offerings. That may change, but it will probably be too little, too late. They are not using cameras of any kind now, other than their phones.

Reply
May 6, 2022 13:03:24   #
therwol Loc: USA
 
larryepage wrote:
They are not using cameras of any kind now, other than their phones.


That may be 99% true, but I was surprised in a recent drive down the California coast to see at least a a couple of dozen people using real cameras to take pictures of the scenery.

Reply
May 6, 2022 13:33:23   #
Photoladybon Loc: Long Island
 
nealbralley wrote:
D850s may be stuck in 2017, but that is a great place to be stuck as a DSLR. I trust my D850 over any of the mirrorless cameras I own! It is big, it is heavy, it is responsive, and it delivers for me. There is nothing magic about mirrorless cameras; they are energy (battery) hogs. Newer doesn't mean better.

A D850 is plenty good enough in the right hands!


I couldn't agree more!! I moved to Olympus but still maintain my 850 and will probably hold on to it until it dies. IMHO it's the best Nikon ever made.

Reply
May 6, 2022 14:21:21   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
No!

Reply
 
 
May 6, 2022 14:25:46   #
The Capt.
 
therwol wrote:
I own a D850. I don't believe that there is any camera in their lineup that is better for landscapes and family related photos. The IQ is stunning. On the other hand, if your goal is BIF or other action photos, the faster frame rates of their mirrorless cameras (especially the Z9) offer some advantages. Also, the D850 is woefully inadequate for video. Unless you use fixed focus, it continuously hunts when following moving subjects. The contrast detection focus with the mirror up just sucks. The fact that you can't use a viewfinder when taking video means holding the camera away from your body to see the scene you're filming, and I have found this to be less stable than using a camera or camcorder with a viewfinder that is held to your face with your arms braced against your body. This is what being stuck in 2017 means.
I own a D850. I don't believe that there is any ... (show quote)


I have shot videos of high school basketball games and focusing is manual easy. Use a tripod to stabilize the camera so you can see the LCD. In the LCD it will show the area in focus. If you are focused to close turn the focus ring clockwise to move focus back or farther away.

Reply
May 6, 2022 14:29:18   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
Gene51 wrote:
No!


Yes!



---

Reply
May 6, 2022 14:30:36   #
The Capt.
 
kpmac wrote:
I have learned that my D850 does all I need it to do. It may not be 30 fps but I do fine with BIF. Why not just use a video camera instead of a DSLR if you want max frames per second? Eventually, we will get to the point where we just set the camera on a tripod and come back later. That ain't fun.


The D850 can shoot at 30 frames/sec.

Reply
May 6, 2022 14:59:53   #
therwol Loc: USA
 
The Capt. wrote:
I have shot videos of high school basketball games and focusing is manual easy. Use a tripod to stabilize the camera so you can see the LCD. In the LCD it will show the area in focus. If you are focused to close turn the focus ring clockwise to move focus back or farther away.


In a controlled setting, you can compensate for some of the D850's video shortcomings. You can pre-focus or manually focus. You can use a tripod or harness/stabilizer to steady the camera. Let me tell you what happened to me recently when I was taking pictures of elephant seals on a beach with my D850. My wife insisted I take some video. I hadn't brought my camcorder. It was a disaster. In the bright sunlight, I couldn't see a damn thing except shadows on the screen on the back of the camera. I couldn't hold it steady enough out in front of me to make decent video. My wife wanted me to zoom in on some particular animals, and the zooming was very jerky from having to support 5 pounds of camera out in front of me and work the zoom ring on the lens at the same time. The camera had been set on continuous focus. The focus hunting every 10 seconds or so was really bothersome in the final video, which is next to worthless anyway. I won't go on vacation without taking my camcorder in the future.

Reply
 
 
May 6, 2022 15:00:53   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
The Capt. wrote:
I have shot videos of high school basketball games and focusing is manual easy. Use a tripod to stabilize the camera so you can see the LCD. In the LCD it will show the area in focus. If you are focused to close turn the focus ring clockwise to move focus back or farther away.


50 years ago (well, 47 years ago), I shot video for our HS basketball coaches using Sony reel to reel monochrome equipment. Shot from the top of the stands. Manual focus. Don't remember it ever being a problem. The coaches loved it. My brother-in-law was the producer and (usually) the director for his church's video team. They used three broadcast cameras. Focus was manual, using controls mounted on the handle of the tripod (industry standard method).

I agree that the lack of reasonably priced parfocal lenses and the poor provision for manual focus on modern autofocus lenses is not ideal for shooting video. That's why I say that if video is important, the best solution is to buy a video camera. Stop blaming it on the camera after cheaping out and buying incorrect equipment. Or at least stop whining.

Reply
May 6, 2022 15:42:45   #
Blues Dude
 
larryepage wrote:
Stop blaming it on the camera after cheaping out and buying incorrect equipment. Or at least stop whining.

If people stopped blaming the camera for their poor pictures, they would have to admit their own inadequacies. And if they stopped whining, bitching, moaning, complaining, etc., social media would cease to exist... and then the Earth would stop spinning... because everything revolves around them. 😎

Reply
May 6, 2022 15:59:37   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Success is the photographer. Failure is the equipment.

Reply
May 6, 2022 16:00:36   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
larryepage wrote:
50 years ago (well, 47 years ago), I shot video for our HS basketball coaches using Sony reel to reel monochrome equipment. Shot from the top of the stands. Manual focus. Don't remember it ever being a problem. The coaches loved it. My brother-in-law was the producer and (usually) the director for his church's video team. They used three broadcast cameras. Focus was manual, using controls mounted on the handle of the tripod (industry standard method).

I agree that the lack of reasonably priced parfocal lenses and the poor provision for manual focus on modern autofocus lenses is not ideal for shooting video. That's why I say that if video is important, the best solution is to buy a video camera. Stop blaming it on the camera after cheaping out and buying incorrect equipment. Or at least stop whining.
50 years ago (well, 47 years ago), I shot video fo... (show quote)


Could you elaborate?

.. poor provision for manual focus on modern autofocus lenses

I only have three lenses that require switching between auto and manual focusing. They are my oldest (20+ years) Nikkor "AF" lenses. Not really modern.



---

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.