Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Cellphone Cameras
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
May 1, 2022 13:44:19   #
srt101fan
 
ecommons wrote:
It really comes down to what you want. It's like comparing a Brownie camera to a SLR. The brownie has a fixed optical lens. a fixed aperture, and a single shutter speed and takes pictures. But it has its limits.

An Apple Iphone camera is more flexible, but has it's limits as well. I can't mount a telephoto zoom lens or a wide angle lens to it. My polarizer filter is to big to fit it. It takes pictures, but has it's limits.

I on occasionally use a cell phone camera because it's there. It fits in my hip pocket. But for serious work, my SLR is far more flexible and adaptable to what I need. It and its accessories require a back pack.

The phone takes great snapshots. My camera takes great photographs...........
It really comes down to what you want. It's like c... (show quote)


Many a great photograph made with a cell phone camera; many a snapshot taken with a camera.....

Reply
May 1, 2022 14:19:23   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
srt101fan wrote:
Many a great photograph made with a cell phone camera; many a snapshot taken with a camera.....


Reply
May 1, 2022 14:20:56   #
Retina Loc: Near Charleston,SC
 
mikegreenwald wrote:
A comment by dpullum in an unrelated post on 4/30 led me to think about cellphone cameras.
It is clear that Apple, Samsung, and Alphabet all produce ‘phones with cameras that are amazing by any standard. I’m currently using a Samsung Galaxy S21, but I have no reason to think it’s either better nor worse than other brands of the same age.
However, I’m curious about the relative abilities of all current iterations of the different brands available.
What abilities should be reviewed (there are certainly others that I can’t think of at this moment)?
1. IQ of images at wide, standard, and long lens settings.
Subset: accuracy of focus and controllability of depth of field.
2. Ability at handling a wide variety of light levels.
3. Ability to handle scenes requiring a wide dynamic range.
4. Range of focal lengths of imbedded lenses.
5. Color bias, if any.
6. Image stabilization?
7. Ability to control artificial lighting.
8. Ability to back up images on the go.
9. Storage capacity.
10. Output formats available.
11. IQ of video as well as stills.
12. Ease of use handling the camera, and complexity of menu(s).
13. Careful review of post-processing abilities.
14. Anything else you might think of.

Note that comments like “I use XYZ cellphone camera and it is…….” Are not helpful for comparison purposes.
Does a review including most of the above criteria exist?
A comment by dpullum in an unrelated post on 4/30 ... (show quote)

This does not answer the question any more directly than half the answers so far, so please ignore my post if that matters. My use of phone cameras relates to how easily the camera works with high productivity applications. This is more a question of which OS the phone is tied to. The questions you ask are great, however, I use my phone camera for purposes I would not do with a dedicated camera. I love the portability of SOOC pans while hiking, photo "scans" of documents with auto skew and stretch, and fake portrait mode when I should have brought along a real camera. More and more of these special features have been acquired by the big company OS's from independent developers. It's hard to keep up. As good as these phone cameras get, I still see them as handy tools for which I would never give up my quest for a FF MILC so I might someday have a truly adventurous life.

Reply
 
 
May 1, 2022 14:46:23   #
rmorrison1116 Loc: Near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
A photographer brings their camera.


How brilliant, I'd never have thought that! A photographer bringing a camera, such a nouveau idea...

Reply
May 1, 2022 15:02:58   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 

Reply
May 1, 2022 15:03:28   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 
srt101fan wrote:
Many a great photograph made with a cell phone camera; many a snapshot taken with a camera.....



Reply
May 1, 2022 15:07:50   #
rmorrison1116 Loc: Near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
 
fetzler wrote:
I must say that cellphones not really good at anything - even making phone calls. They are, for instance, hard to hold.

I think of cellphone cameras much like Instamatic of the past. They are OK for utilitarian and a family photo ocassionaly but I much perfer a real camera -even a simple one.


Yet another person who doesn't understand the difference between real and dedicated.
Apparently you don't own a decent modern smart phone. I live in Southeast Pennsylvania and I have a cousin who lives in western Oregon, about roughly 3,000 miles west of me. I call and text my cousin often and we have absolutely no problem communicating with each other. My cousin also uses a smart phone. You are 100% wrong about cell phone not being good at anything, including phone calls. There are people who use smart phones as professional cameras, and I guarantee you could not tell the difference in photos without looking at the exif data. I do agree with you though, I too prefer using a dedicated digital camera to the smart phone camera most of the time as I own a few nice DSLR'S and MILC'S and a whole bunch of Canon, Nikkor, Sigma and Tamron lenses, and I prefer my Canon G1X III Bridge camera as my pocket camera. If I don't have a dedicated digital camera with me, I use my Google Pixel 6.

Reply
 
 
May 1, 2022 15:15:40   #
rmorrison1116 Loc: Near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
 
Longshadow wrote:
Why?
Not a general photography discussion?

So discussion about printers should be in the "Printer Section"; Nikon discussion should be in the "Nikon Section"; ...?


I'd feel so out of place in a Nikon section as I own far more Canon gear than Nikon gear (D7200, D500, D850, plenty of lenses).

Reply
May 1, 2022 15:19:46   #
Greg from Romeoville illinois Loc: Romeoville illinois
 
kb6kgx wrote:
If vertically, they should be fired.


I shoot vertically in both my SLR and phone depending on the subject.

Reply
May 1, 2022 15:25:49   #
DRam11 Loc: Polson, MT
 
Reading this is almost as much fun as the oil threads on a truck or motorcycle site.

Reply
May 1, 2022 15:45:16   #
KindaSpikey Loc: English living in San Diego
 
No one is forced to read anything!

Reply
 
 
May 1, 2022 16:00:08   #
delder Loc: Maryland
 
Interesting questions.
I am currently using a Samsung S21-5G and impressed with the quality of pictures it produces.

As far as working with the resulting photos:

1. I can email or text any picture on the phone to anyone.

2. I download ALL Phone Photos to my Desktop every week or two. I do most processing on the larger screen this provides me.

I still use an older Nikon D-3100 with a couple of ZOOM Lenses for more controlled shots,
BUT as has been quoted here before:

The best camera is the one you have with you!

LOTS of candid shots are far more available with the Samsung. The 64 MP ZOOM Lens isn't bad either....

Reply
May 1, 2022 16:13:06   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Imagine your life as a successful photographer. Are you using your phone?

Reply
May 1, 2022 16:52:57   #
jamesl Loc: Pennsylvania
 
Longshadow wrote:
Nope, nothing additional.

My S21 is what it is and does what it does.
I just use it and edit the JPEGS with an editor on my computer.
(I DID get it as a phone... Came with a camera.)


------------

Reply
May 1, 2022 17:22:31   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
rmorrison1116 wrote:
I'd feel so out of place in a Nikon section as I own far more Canon gear than Nikon gear (D7200, D500, D850, plenty of lenses).

What, don't wanna infiltrate a clique?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.