Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon D500 discontinued???
Page <<first <prev 12 of 12
Feb 3, 2024 16:30:03   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
User ID wrote:
Speculation, rumor, or just overly obvious ?
All SLRs were discontinued a while ago (no matter what Pentax says). Now IIRC, the D500 was an SLR ?!? So, the upcoming ten pages should be predictably predictable.

Time to grate cheese and melt butter. Such threads are bad for cholesteral numbers :-(


I can’t believe that YOU missed that this is a zombie thread. 😜🤪🧟‍♂️

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 16:43:31   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
starShoot wrote:
Well now, what we are both missing is the research and development budgets of the camera manufacturers. However, I do concede on the need to be competitive. But my contention that a more capable still camera would have been less costly, or your projection that such cameras would have become expensive niche cameras are both beliefs, contentions and theories, unlikely to be post facto tested. Finally, the comment to which I responded today, appeared on my phone today. Actually, I ignore well in excess of 99.9% of issues on this, and other websites. I also never critize others for their views on photography equipment choices, including subject matter or style. So, while I am not going to lambast you as wrong, mistaken or out-of-touch, I will remind you that the same option to simply not respond is open to you. Again, I am pleased that mirrorless cameras are causing DSLR cameras to be less expensive. That, sir, is a bottom and satisfying line FOR ME. I do hope you are enjoying the photography equipment of YOUR choice.
Well now, what we are both missing is the research... (show quote)


I’m not criticizing your choice of equipment, just stating why you won’t see a modern mirrorless camera without video capability. I’m not saying that there might not be a cost saving in manufacturing a camera without video, but any savings would be a pittance since the differences would be largely firmware related. And even if slightly cheaper to build still not cost effective for a product that wouldn’t be in demand. Also your contention that money spent on video development could have gone too better still camera development also doesn’t make sense. No video development as causing less development for still photo capability.

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 22:21:38   #
Mduffy910 Loc: Michigan
 
AGO wrote:
I am not making the claim that it is better, just different. For me, it is what is best for many reasons. What is better or best is subjective. The technology behind mirrorless may be more advanced, but that does not mean that SLRs are old and worn out, any more than at 70 I am old and worn out. And certainly, it does not mean that mirrorless is best for all of us.

Perhaps to help you understand why I take umbrage with the mirrorless devotees who try to convert the rest of us, let me make an analogy. Long ago I left the religion I was raised in because the attitude of the congregants was that they, and only they, were the true religion and everyone else was going to hell. I couldn't buy that and wouldn't adhere to their philosophy that they had to convert everyone else. By the same token, I don't go around telling film photographers that they need to move on to digital and I resent the condescending attitude that many (but certainly not all) mirrorless aficionados display.

I don't mind mirrorless devotees pointing out the advantages of their cameras, any more than I mind Canon owners pointing out the attributes of their equipment. But please, when you do that, drop the superior attitude.
I am not making the claim that it is better, just ... (show quote)


Well said, been shaking my head as I read this thread. Who cares if a person likes a DSLR, like me, so what? Conversely if a person feels that a mirrorless camera is better for them that's great! Why all the negativity and derogatory comments? We ALL have something in common, we love doing our photography!

Reply
 
 
Feb 3, 2024 22:37:29   #
Sltolivar
 
.

That is a great market camera. No warranty from Nikon.

Steve

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 22:44:06   #
Sltolivar
 
BebuLamar wrote:
B&H said it's in stock.


Those are gray market cameras there is no warranty from Nikon.

Steve

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 23:25:16   #
User ID
 
SuperflyTNT wrote:
I can’t believe that YOU missed that this is a zombie thread. 😜🤪🧟‍♂️

Yup. Sneck right by me. Maybe we cant have ten pages upcoming since theres already ten pages gone by .....

Scrolled back after your reminder. Seems it was never a really "serious" thread before an "intermission" of a coupla years.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 12 of 12
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.