Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
F***i funds torture of dogs and monkeys, now he wants to inject your kids.
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Oct 26, 2021 17:33:30   #
Wuligal Loc: Slippery Rock, Pa.
 
It's not just random reactions. Some people take "exotic" medications and have to be extremely careful about any other medications they ingest including vitamin supplements and simple over the counter stuff such as a simple aspirin.

Some people with Cerebral Palsy can't get a simple flu shot let alone the v*****e. What should they do?

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 17:48:01   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
Wuligal wrote:
Point out just one lie....just one.....in my last post.

So far you have called me a liar (twice) wished me to be a victim of a F***i experiment and addressed me as a child.
Sure sounds a lot like a bully hard at work to me. Name calling, demeaning comments and trying to intimidate others with threats of pain and torture. Congratulations, you're very good at what you do and who you are.


Calling F***i names after a N**i is one. Trying to say you have been intimidated with “pain and torture” is another.

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 18:06:04   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
cwp3420 wrote:
Nope. I’m saying that many people have been either medically injured or have died from the v*****e.


Would you care to stack up the numbers? How many have been medically injured or died from the v*****e vs the number who have been medically injured or died from C***D?

Reply
 
 
Oct 26, 2021 18:59:17   #
Texcaster Loc: Queensland
 
mikee wrote:
Do you know how pharmaceutical RESEARCH is done? Yup, trials with sub-human mammals.


We just went through an experiment with an orange sub-human mammal in charge. We almost lost America to Steve Bannon's chimp.

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 19:05:06   #
Wuligal Loc: Slippery Rock, Pa.
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
Calling F***i names after a N**i is one. Trying to say you have been intimidated with “pain and torture” is another.


Pay attention....I said, and I quote, "THREATS of pain and torture". Big difference between a threat and pretending I said I was actually "intimidated with pain and torture". The former is a threat of an action, the latter implies the actual use of pain and torture.

A bully is a bully is a bully and one must be very careful around them because they will twist every word to accommodate themselves.

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 19:54:06   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
Wuligal wrote:
Pay attention....I said, and I quote, "THREATS of pain and torture". Big difference between a threat and pretending I said I was actually "intimidated with pain and torture". The former is a threat of an action, the latter implies the actual use of pain and torture.

A bully is a bully is a bully and one must be very careful around them because they will twist every word to accommodate themselves.


Why do you argue with impaired?

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 20:35:00   #
Wuligal Loc: Slippery Rock, Pa.
 
letmedance wrote:
Why do you argue with impaired?


I'm not arguing with anyone......simply stating my case. Besides, I refuse to have an intellectual battle with an unarmed man.

Reply
 
 
Oct 26, 2021 21:17:44   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
Answer: One cannot know.

We can know, however, that the odds of an individual having a serious reaction to the v***s remain so low that we should worry more about being struck by lightning than about having a reaction to the v*****e.
cwp3420 wrote:
So how is one to know if it’s your turn to have a reaction? That’s why so many people don’t want the v*****e. Why is that so difficult for you left wingers to understand?

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 22:20:29   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
JohnFrim wrote:
So what you are saying is that because the v*****e MIGHT be dangerous for some then NO ONE should take it???


NOT AT ALL!

My comment was a response to: cwp3420 and his comment: “The v*****e has not been proven safe and effective for everyone . . .”.

To which I stated that “NO v*****e has been ‘proven safe and effective for everyone’”, and that he darn well knew that! And was just spreading regurgitated disinformation.

I am saying that, although there HAVE been adverse reactions to the C***d v*****es, the incidence of bad or poor reactions is NO HIGHER THAN THAT OF OTHER V*****ES. From what I understand, that is hovering around 0.04%. And those are recorded Deaths. What does that mean? Well, that would be (per 100,000): 100000/x=100/0.04. Which comes out to 40. Thats right, forty out of 100,000. If extrapolated to a population of three hundred million, that would be 1200 people. STILL a very small number!

Even if there are non-fatal reactions that raise the percentage-affected to 1 in 300 000, I would “play that Lotto”.

So what is your assessment of personal risk? Are the odds of 1200 in 300 000 000 (or 12 in 3 000 000) personally acceptable? To me they are.

I recommend everyone to get some sort of protection-by-v******tion to contain or stop the horrible effects of the SARS CoV-2 v***s.

I also urge everyone to learn HOW v*****es work, how the body reacts and creates T-cells and how they recognize (by “training”—i.e. inoculation) and the antibody-response to potential infections.

Reply
Oct 27, 2021 08:37:35   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
Wyantry wrote:
NOT AT ALL!

My comment was a response to: cwp3420 and his comment: “The v*****e has not been proven safe and effective for everyone . . .”.

To which I stated that “NO v*****e has been ‘proven safe and effective for everyone’”, and that he darn well knew that! And was just spreading regurgitated disinformation.

I am saying that, although there HAVE been adverse reactions to the C***d v*****es, the incidence of bad or poor reactions is NO HIGHER THAN THAT OF OTHER V*****ES. From what I understand, that is hovering around 0.04%. And those are recorded Deaths. What does that mean? Well, that would be (per 100,000): 100000/x=100/0.04. Which comes out to 40. Thats right, forty out of 100,000. If extrapolated to a population of three hundred million, that would be 1200 people. STILL a very small number!

Even if there are non-fatal reactions that raise the percentage-affected to 1 in 300 000, I would “play that Lotto”.

So what is your assessment of personal risk? Are the odds of 1200 in 300 000 000 (or 12 in 3 000 000) personally acceptable? To me they are.

I recommend everyone to get some sort of protection-by-v******tion to contain or stop the horrible effects of the SARS CoV-2 v***s.

I also urge everyone to learn HOW v*****es work, how the body reacts and creates T-cells and how they recognize (by “training”—i.e. inoculation) and the antibody-response to potential infections.
b NOT AT ALL! /b br br My comment was a respons... (show quote)


Sorry about a misunderstanding. You rephrased cwp3420's comment, and it was actually his comment -- that you expressed more emphatically -- that I was arguing against. I should have gone back to his original statement. I did argue with another of his statements on page 2 and page 3.

But just in case some folks might have interpreted your post as being against the v*****e, thanks for clarifying your stance. I am 100% with you on this issue, and you have provided some excellent information on how v*****es work in another thread.

Reply
Oct 27, 2021 16:12:55   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
SteveS wrote:
So F***i not only gets caught lying to Congress, but also for funding the torture of dogs and monkeys. Sure makes you want to trust him to inject your kids in November doesn't it?


https://nypost.com/2021/10/24/lawmakers-slam-anthony-f***i-for-alleged-puppy-experiments/
https://headlinehealth.com/f***is-monkey-experiment-did-not-work-out-as-planned/
https://nypost.com/2021/10/24/f***i-predicts-c***d-v*****es-for-kids-will-be-ready-in-nov/


Talk about an evil person.
Makes Vick look like he was a gentile dog lover.

Reply
 
 
Oct 27, 2021 16:44:29   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
Architect1776 wrote:
Talk about an evil person.
Makes Vick look like he was a gentile dog lover.


So you admit that you know nothing about how medical research is done. Not surprised, you just use but never think to know how it was developed.

Reply
Oct 28, 2021 09:41:26   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
Thanks for rational breakdown of this matter.
Wyantry wrote:
NOT AT ALL!

My comment was a response to: cwp3420 and his comment: “The v*****e has not been proven safe and effective for everyone . . .”.

To which I stated that “NO v*****e has been ‘proven safe and effective for everyone’”, and that he darn well knew that! And was just spreading regurgitated disinformation.

I am saying that, although there HAVE been adverse reactions to the C***d v*****es, the incidence of bad or poor reactions is NO HIGHER THAN THAT OF OTHER V*****ES. From what I understand, that is hovering around 0.04%. And those are recorded Deaths. What does that mean? Well, that would be (per 100,000): 100000/x=100/0.04. Which comes out to 40. Thats right, forty out of 100,000. If extrapolated to a population of three hundred million, that would be 1200 people. STILL a very small number!

Even if there are non-fatal reactions that raise the percentage-affected to 1 in 300 000, I would “play that Lotto”.

So what is your assessment of personal risk? Are the odds of 1200 in 300 000 000 (or 12 in 3 000 000) personally acceptable? To me they are.

I recommend everyone to get some sort of protection-by-v******tion to contain or stop the horrible effects of the SARS CoV-2 v***s.

I also urge everyone to learn HOW v*****es work, how the body reacts and creates T-cells and how they recognize (by “training”—i.e. inoculation) and the antibody-response to potential infections.
b NOT AT ALL! /b br br My comment was a respons... (show quote)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.