Proof of L*****t media (Page 4): Here is her direct quote.... "You all could do a better job of selling this, to be frank. Every time I come here, I go through family medical leave...

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Bazbo wrote:

Isn't Pelosi's quote, even is genuine (doubtful) is that not evidence that the media is NOT left biased?

Noting Pelosi is aggravated by the media is not compelling evidence of your assertion.

Here is her direct quote....

"You all could do a better job of selling this, to be frank. Every time I come here, I go through family medical leave, climate, the issues that are in there.".

She likes to tell the American people about the candy in the bill but she never allows us to see the insanity in the bill, the American people hopefully are smart enough to not take the blue pill.

BTW, you are wrong, the media has been doing its damnedest to sell the crappy bill, no matter what Pelosi thinks.

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

Blurryeyed wrote:

Here is her direct quote.... br br "You all ... (show quote)

I repeat: Pelosi complaining about the media is not evidence of the assertion. In fact, it is just the opposite. Try responding to what I actually say, Shape Shifter.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Bazbo wrote:

I repeat: Pelosi complaining about the media is not evidence of the assertion. In fact, it is just the opposite. Try responding to what I actually say, Shape Shifter.

Maybe you should put down the bong counselor, your assertion was......

"Noting Pelosi is aggravated by the media is not compelling evidence of your assertion" to which I replied.... "BTW, you are wrong, the media has been doing its damnedest to sell the crappy bill, no matter what Pelosi thinks." the premise of your statement was false, and I simply pointed that out.

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

Blurryeyed wrote:

Maybe you should put down the bong counselor, your assertion was......

"Noting Pelosi is aggravated by the media is not compelling evidence of your assertion" to which I replied.... "BTW, you are wrong, the media has been doing its damnedest to sell the crappy bill, no matter what Pelosi thinks." the premise of your statement was false, and I simply pointed that out.

The original assertion was (reread the title of the thread if you must) was Proof of Media Bias and and the OP only offered Pelosi complaining about the media as "proof". There was no error whatsoever in either logic or fact in my riposte. The errors in logic and fact are on your side. You would have to be three days dead not to see that.

You are constantly whining about bias in your favorite left wing media outlets yet you yourself have admitted you do not read WaPo (then how do you now its biased? I guess someone told you) AND you have always run away from my challenge to take the lead story of WaPo (on any day you choose) and point out the bias. The offer still stands.

But run away again. Because all you have is hot air and what Tucker Carlson tells you to think.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Bazbo wrote:

The original assertion was (reread the title of th... (show quote)

LOL... You are now going to assert that WaPo is not biased, good luck with that counselor.

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

Bazbo wrote:

The original assertion was (reread the title of th... (show quote)

Pick no source just what shows up anything that question your sources it false. Get over it

National Park

boberic wrote:

A direct quote from Nancy Pelosi. "The media is not doing enough to sell the Bill" Meaning the $ 5 1/2 trillion infrastructure bill. It is not the media's job to "sell" any bill. (The last 2 sentences are mine)- Don't ask for a ling, the news is everywhere

Remember when Trump said "FOX isn't working for us anymore"? Is a "News" station supposed to be "working" for a President?

National Park

Blurryeyed wrote:

There can be no denying that today's mainstream media is not much different from the state media in China or the old Pravada of the Soviet Union.

If the "mainstream" media ( I assume by this you refer to CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS) isn't much different from the state media in China or the old Pravda in the USSR they wouldn't be carrying stories critical of Biden's handling of Afghanistan or the border. A better analogy to news organizations in totalitarian countries would be Newsmax or FOX.

National Park

Fotoartist wrote:

Those of us without out our head in the sand saw t... (show quote)

Well, the 3.5 trillion dollar bill is for 10 years, averaging $350 billion/year. I think that is an important point that the public should know about. When is the last time you saw the media point that out?

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

National Park wrote:

If the "mainstream" media ( I assume by this you refer to CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS) isn't much different from the state media in China or the old Pravda in the USSR they wouldn't be carrying stories critical of Biden's handling of Afghanistan or the border. A better analogy to news organizations in totalitarian countries would be Newsmax or FOX.

Yeah, it took them a while to get there, about as long as until they could no longer avoid it.

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

National Park wrote:

If the "mainstream" media ( I assume by this you refer to CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS) isn't much different from the state media in China or the old Pravda in the USSR they wouldn't be carrying stories critical of Biden's handling of Afghanistan or the border. A better analogy to news organizations in totalitarian countries would be Newsmax or FOX.

Newsmax fox f**e news

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

Blurryeyed wrote:

LOL... You are now going to assert that WaPo is not biased, good luck with that counselor.

Don't neeed luck. I have facts. You are the one running away.

Take the challenge big boy. Put your money where your mouth is.