Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Aspect Ratio?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 7 next> last>>
Sep 12, 2021 12:36:26   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Todd G wrote:
I changed mine too 16.9 because I burn my photos to watch on the widescreen TV. I don't want the bars on each side to show.


Your personal preference.

Reply
Sep 12, 2021 12:48:12   #
rcarol
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
You get less pixels. The pixel resolution of your EOS sensor is based on the 5x3 aspect. Using anything else causes the camera to give you less than the maximum pixel resolution. Usually, the photographer would want to decide which pixels to discard, not the camera via this setting.


5 X 3 aspect? What EOS camera has a this aspect ratio?

Reply
Sep 12, 2021 12:52:55   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
rcarol wrote:
5 X 3 aspect? What EOS camera has a this aspect ratio?

Did you read that he acknowledged that it was a typo??????
Guess not.......

Reply
 
 
Sep 12, 2021 12:56:15   #
BebuLamar
 
burkphoto wrote:
I can choose between 16:9 and "Cinema 4K" on my GH4. My son's GH5 can handle those plus anamorphic wide screen (with a squeeze to 4:3 and expansion in post).

Some models of Lumix can record "4K" or "6K" video (really 5.6K), that can be cropped in post production editing to 4:3, 16:9, or C4K.


So what is the aspect ratio of C4K or 6K? I know they are of different resolution but what's the aspect ratio?

Reply
Sep 12, 2021 13:35:58   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
I always shoot full frame. I don't consider the card space a problem. If the image needs to be at a different aspect ratio (a frequent occurence) I crop it in post. Most of my crops are unconstrained by "standard" values. If I want a print to fit a frame I will add a border (usually white or black depending on the image and the frame) to provide the proper aspect ratio for the frame. I have not to date produced any shots that were really worthy of a mat.

Reply
Sep 12, 2021 13:50:24   #
Craigdca Loc: California
 
Bill_de wrote:
My neighbors like when I print 8x6. One women told me her group.likes cheap 8x10 frames which leaves a one inch border.

---


What a great idea - thanks for sharing!

Reply
Sep 12, 2021 13:54:46   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
BebuLamar wrote:
So what is the aspect ratio of C4K or 6K? I know they are of different resolution but what's the aspect ratio?


DCI Cinema 4K is 4096x2160 pixels. 1.9:1 aspect ratio.

6K is basically 4:3, can be cropped however you want it.

Reply
 
 
Sep 12, 2021 13:58:17   #
repleo Loc: Boston
 
ImageCreator wrote:
Being the expert you are, have you for any reason changed the ratio?


Not an expert, but one situation might be if you have a specific frame or mat you want to use. Some frame and pre-cut mats are harder to find than others. Frame your shot with the corresponding aspect ratio to make sure you get everything you want in the picture.

Reply
Sep 12, 2021 13:58:38   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
I'm not sure where I came up with 5:3 earlier, but now too late to correct. The EOS is 3:2. ...

I am surprised no one caught this before you posted the correction.

Reply
Sep 12, 2021 13:59:04   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Bill_de wrote:
My neighbors like when I print 8x6. One women told me her group.likes cheap 8x10 frames which leaves a one inch border.

---


And they sell precut 8x10 mats with a 6x8 opening.

Reply
Sep 12, 2021 14:11:49   #
Craigdca Loc: California
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
I always shoot full frame. I don't consider the card space a problem. If the image needs to be at a different aspect ratio (a frequent occurence) I crop it in post. Most of my crops are unconstrained by "standard" values. If I want a print to fit a frame I will add a border (usually white or black depending on the image and the frame) to provide the proper aspect ratio for the frame. I have not to date produced any shots that were really worthy of a mat.


Good tip. I may begin applying this border technique to my IG posts that occasionally get cropped willy nilly.

Reply
 
 
Sep 12, 2021 14:19:52   #
User ID
 
rcarol wrote:
5 X 3 aspect? What EOS camera has a this aspect ratio?

An EOS film camera, when you use a cheap processing service ;-)

Reply
Sep 12, 2021 14:26:27   #
User ID
 
I had a Globuscope 35 with variable ratio on film from about 3:1 through 7:1, and there was no cropping involved.

The format didn’t shrink ... it expanded. So if you didn’t have a 5x7 enlarger you were constrained to 5:1.

Reply
Sep 12, 2021 16:32:13   #
Cheese
 
If you are displaying your photos primarily on a TV screen, you may want to select the 16:9 aspect ratio. Shooting 3:2 may give you more pixels; but, depending on your composition, you may be unable to crop to 16:9 later.

Similarly if making 8x10 portraits, if you shoot 3:2 you may not have left enough margins to get the final crop.

Reply
Sep 12, 2021 16:46:52   #
Rick Mills Loc: California
 
I shoot 16x9 or requested Cine format for Broadcast since we went Digital.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.