Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Distinctive looks of cameras and lenses
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Jul 20, 2021 20:28:01   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Anyone who has shot the Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S DX will tell you this lens has a distinct look too. It's not BS simply because you've never used one of these unique lenses. But certainly, 'character' does get an oversell in general conversation and application.

Many Leica lenses, including some of those designed for Panasonic LUMIX, also have unique optical ”personalities.”

Reply
Jul 20, 2021 22:21:25   #
ronpier Loc: Poland Ohio
 
MrBob wrote:
When going through the archives late at night looking at a variety of images taken with a variety of digital cameras I was struck by the difference in basic looks… Different color science of diff. Brands and different resolutions with diff. Lenses are recipes for totally diff. looks… I sometimes tire of looking at the high resolution, contrasty, color in your face, of some digital. Some of my humble captures at 8 MP or less with diff. Lenses such as Zeiss etc… seem to give a more Natural look for lack of a better word. I am also an audio buff and I guess like audio and components, when you get that certain synergy of camera, lens, and subject matter everything comes into focus ( pardon the pun ). I guess thats why I am always broke supporting multiple wives with names like Canon, Olympus, Sony and Sigma… They all have diff. Kitchen skills. What do you all think ? Reflecting on what I was trying to say in my above rambling, do you think certain combos are better suited to certain types of subject matter or am I out in the weeds again ? Thanks for taking the time to read and reflect... Bob
When going through the archives late at night look... (show quote)


Two of my Nikons have the old CCD sensors. Definitely a different look than my CMOS sensor Nikons. Color rendition is different. Can’t say any are better, just different in their own way.

Reply
Jul 20, 2021 22:49:28   #
mundy-F2 Loc: Chicago suburban area
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Anyone who has shot the Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S DX will tell you this lens has a distinct look too. It's not BS simply because you've never used one of these unique lenses. But certainly, 'character' does get an oversell in general conversation and application.


Same is true of the Nikkor AF-S 17-35MM F/2.8 D ED.
Mundy

Reply
 
 
Jul 20, 2021 22:54:10   #
kenArchi Loc: Seal Beach, CA
 
I always wondered about this with various sensors.
You can't change sensors like you can with film. And each brand of camera has it's own processing by their engineers. So all sensors are not the same?
Well anyway, I'm not quite sure what I am talking about.

So, if you use Kodak gold 100 film in all your different cameras, will the pictures be the same?

So using the same film in different cameras will give the same color, contrast, sharpness, etc.?

Reply
Jul 20, 2021 23:11:36   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
kenArchi wrote:
I always wondered about this with various sensors.
You can't change sensors like you can with film. And each brand of camera has it's own processing by their engineers. So all sensors are not the same?
Well anyway, I'm not quite sure what I am talking about.

So, if you use Kodak gold 100 film in all your different cameras, will the pictures be the same?

So using the same film in different cameras will give the same color, contrast, sharpness, etc.?


Color film is subject to the glass in the lens, and which frequencies of light are transmitted while others are partially filtered.

Lenses vary considerably. The same color film will record colors differently with different lens brands. This is most noticeable with a slide film. Negatives are similar to digital raw files, in that post-processing plays a huge role.

Reply
Jul 20, 2021 23:39:53   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
burkphoto wrote:
Color film is subject to the glass in the lens, and which frequencies of light are transmitted while others are partially filtered.

Lenses vary considerably. The same color film will record colors differently with different lens brands. This is most noticeable with a slide film. Negatives are similar to digital raw files, in that post-processing plays a huge role.


A couple of years ago, after I got my Nikkor 24-120mm f/4 G VR zoom, I noticed that it didn't seem to render color as well as my other lenses. So I crank up the saturation one notch when using it in order to get similar results.

And yes, my D200 with its CCD sensor was noticeably different from my D300 with its CMOS sensor and from my later cameras. I didn't know as much about Picture Controls or post processing when using those cameras and haven't taken the time to go back and see how much of the difference could be dialed out.

Reply
Jul 21, 2021 09:46:10   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
larryepage wrote:
A couple of years ago, after I got my Nikkor 24-120mm f/4 G VR zoom, I noticed that it didn't seem to render color as well as my other lenses. So I crank up the saturation one notch when using it in order to get similar results.

And yes, my D200 with its CCD sensor was noticeably different from my D300 with its CMOS sensor and from my later cameras. I didn't know as much about Picture Controls or post processing when using those cameras and haven't taken the time to go back and see how much of the difference could be dialed out.
A couple of years ago, after I got my Nikkor 24-12... (show quote)


I had an early 2000s version of the 24-120. It had a lot of different elements and wasn’t Nikon’s best effort. But then, I was using the D100, probably the least responsive digital camera I’ve ever used. I was happy to sell that and move on.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.